[JoPP-Public] [Denisa Kera] Re: Journal of Peer Prudction on ERIH?

[maxigas]

hi,

Please find below our exchange with Denisa Kera on working towards
including JoPP in the ERIH database.

maxigas

> From: Denisa Kera <denisa.kera at gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 06 May 2016 12:11:48 +0000
> Subject: Re: Journal of Peer Prudction on ERIH?
> To: maxigas <maxigas at anargeek.net>

> Going to the airport, but the base line is that when you apply for jobs,
> tenure, evaluation etc you will run into a problem... ERIH would make
> sense, yes send it to the rest to see what they think.
> I like the people/networks the content, we neede to improve this, get the
> missing data, give DOI to articles etc

On Fri, May 6, 2016, 05:07 maxigas <maxigas at anargeek.net> wrote:

> > Denisa Kera <denisa.kera at gmail.com> writes:
> >
> > > Maxigas,
> >
> > Hi Denisa, nice to hear from you!
> >
> > > Can we prepare these three criteria about JPP so its accepted in ERIH
> > > https://dbh.nsd.uib.no/publiseringskanaler/erihplus/
> >
> > Can I repost your message to the JoPP-public list?
> >
> > > I think it is becoming a good journal, especially in our community...
> >
> > I agree!  I am proud to say that we developed it into something like a
> > veritable intellectual laboratory, at least from my perspective. :)
> >
> > > The main issues seems "
> > >
> > >   * ERIH PLUS requires that no more than two thirds of the authors
> > > published in the journal are from the same institution."
> > >
> > > - do you have the data?
> >
> > No -- in fact I guess that the majority of issues don't include
> > information on author's affiliation. :( Even worse, we are not doing
> > well on the other criteria either:
> >
> > * All original articles should be accompanied by abstracts in English
> > and/or another international language relevant for the field
> >
> > I am not even sure if there are abstracts published for papers, which is
> > a pity because the editorial process of course already includes abstracts.
> >
> > * Information on author affiliations and addresses
> >
> > See above.
> >
> > * No more than two thirds of the authors published in the journal are
> > from the same institution
> >
> > So as far as I see it, it would be quite a job to convert JoPP to
> > conform these criteria.
> >
> > What are the benefits of inclusion?
> >
> > Is there somebody to work on this?
> >
> > Maybe we can include it on a roadmap?

-- 
maxigas, kiberpunk
FA00 8129 13E9 2617 C614 0901 7879 63BC 287E D166
http://relay70.metatron.ai/

In Solidarity with Library Genesis and Sci-hub
http://custodians.online

Share this letter - read it in public - leave it in the printer. Share
your writing - digitize a book - upload your files. Don't let our
knowledge be crushed. Care for the libraries - care for the metadata -
care for the backup. Water the ❀❀❀❀❀ - clean the volcanoes.