[JoPP-Public] Revised article page, proposal

Fri Apr 1 18:15:04 CEST 2016

> On 1 Apr 2016, at 18:06, Nguyen, Lilly <lillyng at email.unc.edu> wrote:
> 
> So, if I understand correctly. This is a sample of what user would see if they clicked on the specific link for the journal article from the Peer Production home site, but NOT from the special issue link. 

yes
> 
> If so, where do the data for the absract and keywords live? Right now, we have those buried within the body of the journal article text, so if you implement this, we would have to go back and edit out all of the abstracts and keywords?

no editing needed if the metadata has been entered correctly (which has been done for most issues, for #3 and #6 some signals/signal numbers are missing)

> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On Apr 1, 2016, at 8:27 AM, Dr. Peter Troxler <trox at fabfolk.com <mailto:trox at fabfolk.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi all
>> 
>> see attached screenshot (if it goes through on the mailing list, otherwise see here https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9V728tkrIGQaGlTc2g5bThINnM/view?usp=sharing <https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9V728tkrIGQaGlTc2g5bThINnM/view?usp=sharing>)
>> 
>> for a suggestion how to change the article pages to include meta-data, incl. reviewing process, abstract and keywords.
>> 
>> If I don't hear strong negative voices over the coming 24 hours I'm going to implement this change and push it to production on Sunday
>> 
>> This change would consequently *not* require the issue 8 team to implement the changes suggested by Mathieu (below).
>> 
>> / Peter
>> 
>> (PS. I am now working on getting the pdf feature back, but better)
>> 
>> <Screen Shot 2016-04-01 at 14.21.17.png>
>> 
>>> On 1 Apr 2016, at 08:11, Mathieu ONeil <mathieu.oneil at anu.edu.au <mailto:mathieu.oneil at anu.edu.au>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>  
>>> PS. Correction
>>> It's probably impossible to change links from frontpage as they are automatically generated
>>> However links to peer reviewed articles from the jopp 8 issue page
>>> http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-8-feminism-and-unhacking-2/ <http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-8-feminism-and-unhacking-2/>
>>> ... should lead to issue 8 peer reviewed articles page
>>> http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-8-feminism-and-unhacking-2/peer-reviewed-papers/ <http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-8-feminism-and-unhacking-2/peer-reviewed-papers/>
>>> ... which has the metadata NOT straight to the article page (same goes for links in release notice)
>>> Hope this makes sense
>>> cheers
>>> mathieu
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> From: jopp-editorial-bounces at lists.ourproject.org <mailto:jopp-editorial-bounces at lists.ourproject.org> <jopp-editorial-bounces at lists.ourproject.org <mailto:jopp-editorial-bounces at lists.ourproject.org>> on behalf of Mathieu ONeil <mathieu.oneil at anu.edu.au <mailto:mathieu.oneil at anu.edu.au>>
>>> Sent: Friday, April 1, 2016 13:14
>>> To: Journal of Peer Production's Editorial team list
>>> Cc: Sophie Toupin, Ms.; lillyng at email.unc.edu <mailto:lillyng at email.unc.edu>
>>> Subject: [JoPP-Editorial] Feminism and (un)hacking links & release (was: Re: JoPP 8 link structure)
>>>  
>>> Hi Peter, all
>>> 
>>> I agree that it would be ideal to be able to access metadata from each article page. However as you say this would involve completely re-doing all of the peer reviewed articles link structure: a big job. Maybe if we raise money (as discussed occasionally) we could pay a web designer some hours to re-code on a test site? What do others think?
>>> 
>>> IN THE MEANTIME:
>>> 
>>> @Sophie, Shaowen and Lilly: congratulations on a really great issue. As said before, I am so sorry the release was delayed. But, now that it is up, we ned to tell the world. So, with that in mind, can you please advise:
>>>  
>>> 1.do you have a short text to announce the JoPP feminism and (un)hacking issue release? 
>>> 
>>> 2.what are your plans re JoPP feminism and (un)hacking issue promotion: Vasilis has set up a pad (thanks) where email lists etc can be listed to avoid multiple posts and I have started to populate it:
>>> http://etherpad2-p2plab.rhcloud.com/p/JoPP_Lists <http://etherpad2-p2plab.rhcloud.com/p/JoPP_Lists>
>>> 
>>> 3.finally, do you intend to modify the link structure as outlined below so that metadata (original subs, reviews, signals) are not bypassed from front page (or release announce)?
>>> 
>>> cheers,
>>> 
>>> Mathieu
>>> 
>>> 
>>> From: jopp-editorial-bounces at lists.ourproject.org <mailto:jopp-editorial-bounces at lists.ourproject.org> <jopp-editorial-bounces at lists.ourproject.org <mailto:jopp-editorial-bounces at lists.ourproject.org>> on behalf of Dr. Peter Troxler <trox at fabfolk.com <mailto:trox at fabfolk.com>>
>>> Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2016 17:05
>>> To: Journal of Peer Production's Editorial team list
>>> Cc: lillyng at email.unc.edu <mailto:lillyng at email.unc.edu>; Sophie Toupin, Ms.
>>> Subject: Re: [JoPP-Editorial] JoPP 8 link structure
>>>  
>>> Disagree slightly:
>>> 
>>> The structure of the issue is pretty similar to all the other issues (compare http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-8-feminism-and-unhacking-2/ <http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-8-feminism-and-unhacking-2/> and http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-0/ <http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-0/>) ... except that the titles ("Peer Reviewed Papers") are malformated and not linked (should be easy to fix).
>>> 
>>> I think, now that we're on top of getting the site back live, that we should change the article pages so they include a link to the meta-data per article
>>> 
>>> That would be much more straight forward and improve the journal as a whole, needs a bit of coding, though :(
>>> 
>>> / Peter
>>> 
>>>> On 31 Mar 2016, at 03:48, Mathieu ONeil <mathieu.oneil at anu.edu.au <mailto:mathieu.oneil at anu.edu.au>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Second try
>>>> cheers
>>>> m
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> From: Mathieu ONeil
>>>> Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2016 10:13
>>>> To: Journal of Peer Production's general and public list
>>>> Subject: JoPP 8 link structure
>>>>  
>>>> Hi SSL
>>>> 
>>>> All the peer reviewed article titles from the frontpage link straight to the html version of the article
>>>> 
>>>> This bypasses the peer reviewed articles page where all the meta data (reviews etc) which makes us distinct are available
>>>> 
>>>> So all peer reviewed article titles should point to the correct page :
>>>> 
>>>> http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-8-feminism-and-unhacking-2/peer-reviewed-papers/ <http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-8-feminism-and-unhacking-2/peer-reviewed-papers/>
>>>> 
>>>> Same thing for announcement
>>>> 
>>>> cheers
>>>> 
>>>> Mathieu
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> JoPP-Editorial mailing list
>>>> JoPP-Editorial at lists.ourproject.org <mailto:JoPP-Editorial at lists.ourproject.org>
>>>> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-editorial <https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-editorial>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> JoPP-Public mailing list
>>> JoPP-Public at lists.ourproject.org <mailto:JoPP-Public at lists.ourproject.org>
>>> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public <https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public>
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> JoPP-Public mailing list
>> JoPP-Public at lists.ourproject.org <mailto:JoPP-Public at lists.ourproject.org>
>> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> JoPP-Public mailing list
> JoPP-Public at lists.ourproject.org
> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ourproject.org/pipermail/jopp-public/attachments/20160401/ffc6fbca/attachment-0001.htm