[JoPP-Public] Broken page

[george dafermos]

A ha, I see. In that case, "deadbeats" shall be a fine name for that page :)

Lots of wishes for the New Year!

-G.

On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 10:35 PM, Mathieu ONeil <mathieu.oneil at anu.edu.au>
wrote:

>  Hi George
>
>
>  The page is in the peer review tree so not really pointing to issues. It
> was meant to list people who submitted to us then did not resubmit after
> reviews - so if they then submitted and published elsewhere our reviewers
> contribution would be documented at least.
>
>
>  So "current" is a bit misleading as these subs are old now - maybe
> rename it "deadbeats"? ;-)
>
>
>  Open to suggestions...
>
>
>  And happy new year to you and everyone else!
>
> ​cheers
>
>
>  Mathieu
>
>
>    ------------------------------
> *From:* jopp-public-bounces at lists.ourproject.org <
> jopp-public-bounces at lists.ourproject.org> on behalf of george dafermos <
> georgedafermos at gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 6, 2015 2:49
> *To:* Journal of Peer Production's general and public list
> *Subject:* [JoPP-Public] Broken page
>
>    I am feeling there's something wrong with this page:
> http://peerproduction.net/peer-review/current/
>
>  Shouldn't that page be dedicated to the most recent issue of JoPP?
>
>  x,
>  g.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> JoPP-Public mailing list
> JoPP-Public at lists.ourproject.org
> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ourproject.org/pipermail/jopp-public/attachments/20150105/0bd6607f/attachment.htm