[JoPP-Public] Broken page

[Mathieu ONeil]

Hi George


The page is in the peer review tree so not really pointing to issues. It was meant to list people who submitted to us then did not resubmit after reviews - so if they then submitted and published elsewhere our reviewers contribution would be documented at least.


So "current" is a bit misleading as these subs are old now - maybe rename it "deadbeats"? ;-)


Open to suggestions...


And happy new year to you and everyone else!

?cheers


Mathieu



________________________________
From: jopp-public-bounces at lists.ourproject.org <jopp-public-bounces at lists.ourproject.org> on behalf of george dafermos <georgedafermos at gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 6, 2015 2:49
To: Journal of Peer Production's general and public list
Subject: [JoPP-Public] Broken page

I am feeling there's something wrong with this page: http://peerproduction.net/peer-review/current/

Shouldn't that page be dedicated to the most recent issue of JoPP?

x,
g.



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ourproject.org/pipermail/jopp-public/attachments/20150105/925906a7/attachment.htm