mathieu.oneil at anu.edu.au
Tue Jan 8 09:53:48 CET 2013
Best wishes for 2013.
Pretty swamped right now with different commitments so I'll keep this short.
The registration for the journal URL had to be renewed. Franco fronted the money and Nate and Maurizio then donated some cash to the P2P Foundation.
@Franco: does this cover your costs?
@all: do we need to have a discussion about some kind of long-term solution so we don't need to do this every year? (if that is possible)
-This month Johan published an article debating / criticising the background of hardware hacking / makers in Le monde diplomatique (in French); not sure if it will be translated?
-It looks as if Christian Fuchs' (and others) work to bring Marx into the mainstream of Internet / communication studies is starting to pay off - I've never heard of the editors for the following CFP but they are all US-based and it is not that common (I think) for US researchers in this field to make these kinds of connections...
---------- Forwarded message ----------
THE INFORMATION SOCIETY (TIS)
CFP: Monetization of User-Generated Content — Marx revisited
Jennifer Proffitt, School of Communication, Florida State University
Hamid Ekbia, School of Library and Information Science, Indiana
Stephen McDowell, School of Communication, Florida State University
Two TIS articles, Fuchs (2010) and Arvidsson & Colleoni (2012), which
develops a critique of the former, have generated considerable debate,
including a response from Fuchs (2012), regarding fundamental
questions about the core processes of value creation and social and
economic organization in contemporary societies. To further this
conversation, we invite 4000- 5000 word Perspective essays, which are
published at the discretion of the guest editors / editor, and should
address one or more of the following questions the Fuchs and Arvidsson
& Colleoni debate problematizes:
* Is the production of user-generated content a form of labor? Or,
should it be re-thought as an affective investment? Or something else?
* Do the theory and concepts that are part of a labor theory of value
limit our understanding of user-generated content? Should we choose a
different point of departure for our theoretical endeavors?
* Is the Marxist notion of commodity an appropriate analytic for
understanding appropriation of value in the case of user-generated
content? Or, should it be de-centered from such an analysis?
* Is the notion of “labor time” relevant to the production of
* How can Marxist and historical-critical perspectives engage with the
new organization of information economies and information societies?
* Is it appropriate to extend Dallas Smythe’s notion of “audience
work,” which he developed in 1970s when broadcasting was the dominant
mode, to the Internet world? What are the problematics of extending
“old” theories to “new” technologies?
The Perspective essays should have layers of thought that take the
thinking beyond Fuchs and Arvidsson & Colleoni. Approximately half of
the essay should be devoted to a reflection on / critique of these
writings and the ensuing debate, and the remaining half should extend
/ add to the theoretical foundations of the debate.
Interested authors are invited to email an abstract (no longer than
500 words) to Jennifer Proffitt (email: jproffitt at fsu.edu) by March 1,
2013. Authors of selected abstracts will be invited to submit their
Perspective essays by July 1, 2013.
For pdf copies of Fuchs (2010) and Arvidsson & Colleoni (2012), please
send an email to hsawhney at indiana.edu
Arvidsson, A., and E. Colleoni. 2012. Value in informational
capitalism and on the Internet. The Information Society 28(3):
Fuchs, C. 2010. Labor in informational capitalism and on the Internet.
The Information Society 26(3): 179 -196.
Fuchs, C. 2012. With or without Marx? With or without capitalism? A
rejoinder to Adam Arvidsson and Eleanor Colleoni. tripleC 10(2):
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the JoPP-Public