[JoPP-Public] Re : Re: Journal Website

Tue Mar 13 09:41:32 CET 2012

hi all

the suggestions sound fine by me, to be honest (and maybe i woke up wrong
side of the bed)
i am very interested in the academic side of things, and find the nitty
gritty stylistic web issues
a bit tiresome. i d rather spend time organising new issues and reviewing
and publishing as much as possible
good stuff for the journal.

i know this had to be done twice now because of the move, but yeah i am
happy with whatever stylistically on web page and functionality as long as
people can access well. its more important for me the substance, what we
publish. i d be happier to discuss that, if there is anything i can do to
help for the next issue (dont know where we are with it) and I can
definitely help more there.

cheers

athina

On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 11:40 PM, Mathieu ONeil <mathieu.oneil at anu.edu.au>wrote:

> Hi Franco, Athina, all
>
> OK, I've had a think and I reckon there are a number of points to discuss.
> (=> proposed actions.)
>
> § Homepage:
> This page has a menu-bar at the bottom with the different categories
> (research, debate, section).
> We dont really need this any more as we are not grouping articles in this
> way.
>
> => I can't modify this as this page appears to be blocked. Can you help? -
> thanks.
>
>
> § About:
> -"Mission statement" should probably be renamed "Submission" as the
> mission statement part is already on the first page and there is a lot more
> content to be added which details the kind of submissions (research,
> debate, etc) which we are interested.
> -There is a page called "Participate" which should probably be renamed
> "Mailing lists" like this one: <http://cspp.oekonux.org/about/mailing-list
> >
> This could also include a link to the still active jox cspp list.
>
> => Does everyone agree? I can't modify this either as all these page
> appear to be blocked. Can you help? - thanks.
>
>
> § Research section:
> As you can see from say <
> http://cspp.oekonux.org/research/mass-peer-activism/rs1.1-swedish-file-sharing>, research
> articles have a lot of different files - there is a summary, the pdf of the
> paper, the pdf of final signals, and pdfs of backrgound material (the
> original submissions and reviews). The way it was set up in Plone was by
> having different pages for all these pdfs but it might be easier (if
> possible) to have them all on one page.
>
> => What do you think?
>
>
> § Structure:
> I do need to return to the importance of having a page which gives a
> reasonably detailed summary of the content of each issue as FM does. Athina
> on this list and Francesca privately also agreed that this is necessary. So
> instead of the current content of the "Issue 0" page (which should in fact
> be the "Editorial") we should have something like:
>
> Issue 0: Mass Peer Activism
>
> Editorial
>
> Research: Mass peer activism
> Jonas Andersson, "The origins and impacts of Swedish filesharing: A Case
> study".
> Mathieu O'Neil, "The Sociology of Critique in Wikipedia".
>
> Debate: ANT and power
> Johan Söderberg, "ANT & Hegelian Marxism".
> Nathaniel Tkacz, "In defence of ANT".
> Mathieu O'Neil, "Domination & networks".
>
> Reports
> Johanna Niesyto & Nathaniel Tkacz, "Critical Point of View".
> Leonhard Dobusch & Michelle Thorne, "Third Free Culture Research
> Conference".
>
> => I am happy to do this, if you are OK with it. I realise that there are
> some smaller menus in sidebars on "Home" and the current version of
> "Research" but once again these only have section titles or article titles
> and I think it is the norm for research journals to have author/title.
>
> cheers,
>
> Mathieu
>
> On 03/10/12, *Athina * <athina.k at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hallo from Amsterdam wish you were here I am at the unlike us Facebook
> conference and it's cool
> About layout a clear page with each issue in the usual manner is indeed
> better
>
> Pass me the slippers
>
>
> Athina
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 9 Mar 2012, at 11:19, Mathieu ONeil <mathieu.oneil at anu.edu.au> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Franco, all
>
> First, thanks again to Franco for stepping up and helping us. He has done
> a great job. My concern with the current layout is that people will not get
> a sense of who has done what until they are on an article page.
>
> We experimented with the division in three parts - research, debate,
> reports - on the cspp site and agreed that it was not satisfactory because
> it gets confusing once you start piling issue upon issue - so a page
> clearly listing table of contents for each issue (showing for example
> sections, authors, editors, facilitators etc) following, or closely related
> to the First Monday model, is pretty important in my view. Alessandro
> raised this point a few weeks ago as well.
>
> What do others think?
>
> @Franco: is there a way to get to this?
>
> We can discuss this offlist more in detail if people think this is too
> technical but I thought it important that these design issues are given a
> public hearing as they tend to be hard to change later.
>
> cheers
>
> Mathieu
>
> Le 03/09/12, *Franco Iacomella * <franco at p2pfoundation.net> a écrit :
>
> El 05/03/12 11:42, Mathieu ONeil escribió:
> >Hi Franco
>
> Hi!
>
> >I see you have begun to import content into the JoPP site - great, thanks!
>
> :)
>
> >Just a quick word to remind you that the "issues" page should be a table
> >of contents a bit like:
> >
> > <http://firstmonday.org/issue/archive>
> http://firstmonday.org/issue/archive
>
> I modified the Issues page so it now list all the issues in a similar
> format. Just the title of each Issue is missing.
>
> >... where different issues would then lead to something like:
> >
> ><http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/issue/view/356>
> http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/issue/view/356
>
> That is already there, we are not using OJS to display the issue content,
> so it wont look exactly like that. But I think our version is better,
> includes the TOC and download links for PDF and ePub.
>
> >If you can set this up I will start putting content in as well.
>
> Well, it's done. However, you don't need to wait to improve the page
> layouts to start adding content. Issue #0 is almost done, but "Research"
> section is missing content, so you can start there.
>
>
> Best,
>
>
>
> --
> Franco Iacomella
>
> --
> ****
> Dr Mathieu O'Neil
> Adjunct Research Fellow
> Australian Demographic and Social Research Institute
> College of Arts and Social Science
> The Australian National University
> email: mathieu.oneil[at]anu.edu.au
> web: http://adsri.anu.edu.au/people/visitors/mathieu.php
>
> _______________________________________________
> JoPP-Public mailing list
> JoPP-Public at lists.ourproject.org
> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public
>
> --
> ****
> Dr Mathieu O'Neil
> Adjunct Research Fellow
> Australian Demographic and Social Research Institute
> College of Arts and Social Science
> The Australian National University
> email: mathieu.oneil[at]anu.edu.au
> web: http://adsri.anu.edu.au/people/visitors/mathieu.php
>
> _______________________________________________
> JoPP-Public mailing list
> JoPP-Public at lists.ourproject.org
> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public
>
>

-- 
<http://www.routledge.com/books/search/keywords/karatzogianni/>
Dr Athina Karatzogianni<http://www2.hull.ac.uk/FASS/humanities/media,_culture_and_society/staff/karatzogianni,_dr_athina.aspx>
Senior Lecturer in New Media and Political Communication
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences
The University of Hull
United Kingdom
HU6 7RX
T: ++44 (0) 1482 46 5790
F: ++44 (0) 1482 466107
E: a.karatzogianni at hull.ac.uk

Download my work for free here:
http://works.bepress.com/athina_karatzogianni/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ourproject.org/pipermail/jopp-public/attachments/20120313/1c02dd6b/attachment.htm 