implementations-list Digest, Vol 48, Issue 8

[damien.thiriet77]

I agree with previous posts. I think compatibility with other modes is more useful than a full vim behavior implementation. Btw, I didn’t face situations where having G at (max-point) would be a problem.


Damien
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 4
> Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 15:10:24 -0400
> From: Barry OReilly 
> Subject: Re: Empty line at EOB
> To: "vi/Vim emulation in Emacs"
> 
> Message-ID:
> 
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> 
> My preference is to avoid conflict with other Emacs modes like eshell and
> auto-revert-tail-mode . That it simplifies the Evil implementation is
> bonus.
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: https://lists.ourproject.org/pipermail/implementations-list/attachments/20121027/9bde9f36/attachment-0001.htm 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> implementations-list mailing list
> implementations-list at lists.ourproject.org
> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/implementations-list
> 
> 
> End of implementations-list Digest, Vol 48, Issue 8
> ***************************************************
> 

Une messagerie gratuite, garantie à vie et des services en plus, ça vous tente ?
Je crée ma boîte mail www.laposte.net