ediff-mode should be in emacs state

Sat Aug 20 15:13:54 CEST 2011

On 20 Aug 2011, José A. Romero L. wrote:

> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 1:13 AM, Michael Markert
> <markert.michael at googlemail.com> wrote:
>> On 20 Aug 2011, York Zhao wrote:
>>
>>> I believe ediff-mode should be in emacs state.
>>
>> I think so, too.
>>
>> And here are some more:
> (...)
>
> Shouldn't this be done the other way around? I mean - wouldn't a list
> of modes in normal state (with emacs state being the default) make
> more sense than a list of modes *not* in normal state?
>
This was discussed here as well:

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.vim-emulation/945

and resulted in the addition of `evil-default-state'.

But I don't think it's useful to change for users unless a list of
normal state modes is included as well.

I'm not sure it would be less work to change the default state to emacs
and gather normal state modes instead of emacs state modes.

<tongue-in-cheek>

And a vim-emulation that defaults to a non-vim state? Come on!

</tongue-in-cheek>

Michael
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://lists.ourproject.org/pipermail/implementations-list/attachments/20110820/a262e650/attachment.pgp 