ediff-mode should be in emacs state

Sat Aug 20 14:00:26 CEST 2011

On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 1:13 AM, Michael Markert
<markert.michael at googlemail.com> wrote:
> On 20 Aug 2011, York Zhao wrote:
>
>> I believe ediff-mode should be in emacs state.
>
> I think so, too.
>
> And here are some more:
(...)

Shouldn't this be done the other way around? I mean - wouldn't a list
of modes in normal state (with emacs state being the default) make
more sense than a list of modes *not* in normal state?

Cheers,
-- 
José A. Romero L.
escherdragon at gmail
"We who cut mere stones must always be envisioning cathedrals."
(Quarry worker's creed)