[implementations-list] Whether Vimpulse may intentionally work differently than Vim (was: [PATCH] Vimpulse: vi* and va* ...)

José A. Romero L. escherdragon at gmail.com
Tue Dec 1 09:19:41 CET 2009

2009/12/1 Jason Spiro <jasonspiro3 at gmail.com>:
> 2009/11/29 José A. Romero L. <escherdragon at gmail.com> wrote:
>> [...]
>> [...] I've divided the original patch into
>> 3 smaller ones: one for removing the extra definitions of  the  function
> I always tried to make sure Vimpulse worked as much like Vim as
> possible.  If somebody thought Vim behavior could be improved, then I
> wanted them to email the Vim mailing list and get the change made in
> Vim.  Once the change was made in Vim, then the same change could be
> made in Vimpulse.

That's  why I put the non-vim stuff in a separate patch. Take it only
if you like it.  IMHO  Vim  is  there  to  be  superseded,  not  just
imitated, but that's only MHO ;-)

José A. Romero L.
escherdragon at gmail.com
"The opposite of war is not peace, it's creation."
(Jonathan Larson)

More information about the implementations-list mailing list