[implementations-list] Whether Vimpulse may intentionally work differently than Vim (was: [PATCH] Vimpulse: vi* and va* ...)
José A. Romero L.
escherdragon at gmail.com
Tue Dec 1 09:19:41 CET 2009
2009/12/1 Jason Spiro <jasonspiro3 at gmail.com>:
> 2009/11/29 José A. Romero L. <escherdragon at gmail.com> wrote:
>> [...]
>> [...] I've divided the original patch into
>> 3 smaller ones: one for removing the extra definitions of the function
(...)
> I always tried to make sure Vimpulse worked as much like Vim as
> possible. If somebody thought Vim behavior could be improved, then I
> wanted them to email the Vim mailing list and get the change made in
> Vim. Once the change was made in Vim, then the same change could be
> made in Vimpulse.
(...)
That's why I put the non-vim stuff in a separate patch. Take it only
if you like it. IMHO Vim is there to be superseded, not just
imitated, but that's only MHO ;-)
Cheers,
--
José A. Romero L.
escherdragon at gmail.com
"The opposite of war is not peace, it's creation."
(Jonathan Larson)
More information about the implementations-list
mailing list