[Copyvisuales-actitud] RV: Protected Scope for Internet(c) Works (was:Kelly v. Arriba Soft )

Jue Jul 31 23:52:06 CEST 2003

Aca va la presentacion en sociedad de la Internet(c)
en la lista 
'CNI-COPYRIGHT -- Copyright & Intellectual Property'

A ver si traduzco al frances para este fin de semana
y lo mando tambien al grupo de la LAL

Saludos - NAtxo

-----Mensaje original-----
De: I.R.Maturana [mailto:irm en in3activa.com]
Enviado el: jueves, 31 de julio de 2003 22:27
Para: 'CNI-COPYRIGHT -- Copyright & Intellectual Property'
Asunto: Protected Scope for Internet(c) Works (was:Kelly v. Arriba Soft
)

Internet Specifications MAY have statutory force
This thread made me thinking it would be plausible to 
write a RFC designed for licensing conventions. 

======== Request For Comments:

  Internet(c) Declaration for Protected Works on Internet

Syntax:

 <meta name="copyright-scope" content="PUBLIC|PROTECTED|PRIVATE">

Human readable auto-generated declaration:

  Internet(c) (date) (author-of-the-work-as-published)
  All rights reserved in all countries.

Summary:	

  As a logical evolution of the Internet Technology 
  this draft defines a Protected Scope on Internet.

  Authors who publish their Works on Internet under this
  Protected scope do allow copy, translation, and basic 
  adaptation of their works, on Internet only.

  Outside the Internet scope, the Protected Works are
  considered Private works, with no prejudice on the 
  Author's Private rights in all countries.

  This draft introduces a new META tag to allow filtering 
  of Works, based on the end-user configuration of
  compliant software clients.

  An human readable Internet(c) Declaration is also 
  proposed, and it may be auto-generated by compliant
  software clients.

=== Section 1: Internet Scope and Definitions

On Internet scope:

- PUBLIC sources are public domain sources and have universal 
  scope; 

- PROTECTED sources are Works using the PROTECTED meta-tag
  or the Internet(c) declaration somewhere in the body.
  They have Internet-only scope; 

- PRIVATE sources are Works with a strict (c) declaration 
  and have private-only scope.

Outside Internet scope:

- There is only 2 Work classes: PUBLIC or PRIVATE.
- PROTECTED sources are defined as PRIVATE. 

=== Section 2- Introducing a new specific META tag to HTML

In the HEAD section:

<meta name="copyright-scope" content="PUBLIC|PRoTECTED|PRIVATE">

- If this META tag does not appears, and if the Internet(c) 
  string cannot be found in the BODY section of Work, then 
  compliant software will assume that source Work is of 
  class PRIVATE.

- PUBLIC and PROTECTED sources MUST be copied by 
  compliants servers or clients, based on Technology rules only.

- PRIVATE sources MAY be copied compliants servers or clients,
  based on the specific end-user's configuration.

=== Section 3- Copyright declaration of Protected Works

Based on the PROTECTED meta-tag, the following Internet(C) 
declarations MAY be auto-generated by compliant servers 
or clients.

When the site URL and the work URL belong to same domain,
the human-readable declaration MUST be:

  Internet(c) (date) (author-of-the-work) (URL of the work)
  All rights reserved in all countries.

When the site URL and the Work URL do NOT belong to the same domain 
(that is: for all copies/translations/derivations)
the human-readable declaration MUST be:

.... etc, etc..

Voila my compliant signature:

Internet(c) 2003 I.R.Maturana (http://internet-copyright.org)
All rights reserved in all countries and all languages

(I registered this URL 2 days ago :)
 Incredible: It was never registered as .ORG before ! !:-D))))

========

I do not know if "using Internet" is an implied license.

However, there is no need to ask authorization to apply 
the Internet Specifications like RFCs.

And I am sure this kind of RFC would make sense for 
lawyers, on any country. :)

I.R.Maturana -- http://www.in3activa.org
(LPT-ESv1r3 - http://www.in3activa.org/doc/es/LPT-ES.html)