[Copyvisuales-actitud] RV: Protected Scope for Internet(c) Works (was:Kelly v. Arriba Soft )

[Vicente J. Ruiz Jurado]

Pues enhorabuena.

Se le puede dar difusión entiendo ¿no?

Un fuerte saludo,

Vicente

El jue, 31-07-2003 a las 22:52, I.R.Maturana escribió:
> Aca va la presentacion en sociedad de la Internet(c)
> en la lista 
> 'CNI-COPYRIGHT -- Copyright & Intellectual Property'
> 
> A ver si traduzco al frances para este fin de semana
> y lo mando tambien al grupo de la LAL
> 
> Saludos - NAtxo
> 
> 
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: I.R.Maturana [mailto:irm en in3activa.com]
> Enviado el: jueves, 31 de julio de 2003 22:27
> Para: 'CNI-COPYRIGHT -- Copyright & Intellectual Property'
> Asunto: Protected Scope for Internet(c) Works (was:Kelly v. Arriba Soft
> )
> 
> 
> 
> Internet Specifications MAY have statutory force
> This thread made me thinking it would be plausible to 
> write a RFC designed for licensing conventions. 
> 
> 
> ======== Request For Comments:
> 
>   Internet(c) Declaration for Protected Works on Internet
> 
> Syntax:
> 
>  <meta name="copyright-scope" content="PUBLIC|PROTECTED|PRIVATE">
> 
> Human readable auto-generated declaration:
> 
>   Internet(c) (date) (author-of-the-work-as-published)
>   All rights reserved in all countries.
> 
> Summary:	
> 
>   As a logical evolution of the Internet Technology 
>   this draft defines a Protected Scope on Internet.
> 
>   Authors who publish their Works on Internet under this
>   Protected scope do allow copy, translation, and basic 
>   adaptation of their works, on Internet only.
> 
>   Outside the Internet scope, the Protected Works are
>   considered Private works, with no prejudice on the 
>   Author's Private rights in all countries.
> 
>   This draft introduces a new META tag to allow filtering 
>   of Works, based on the end-user configuration of
>   compliant software clients.
> 
>   An human readable Internet(c) Declaration is also 
>   proposed, and it may be auto-generated by compliant
>   software clients.
> 
> === Section 1: Internet Scope and Definitions
> 
> On Internet scope:
> 
> - PUBLIC sources are public domain sources and have universal 
>   scope; 
> 
> - PROTECTED sources are Works using the PROTECTED meta-tag
>   or the Internet(c) declaration somewhere in the body.
>   They have Internet-only scope; 
> 
> - PRIVATE sources are Works with a strict (c) declaration 
>   and have private-only scope.
> 
> 
> Outside Internet scope:
> 
> - There is only 2 Work classes: PUBLIC or PRIVATE.
> - PROTECTED sources are defined as PRIVATE. 
> 
> 
> === Section 2- Introducing a new specific META tag to HTML
> 
> In the HEAD section:
> 
> <meta name="copyright-scope" content="PUBLIC|PRoTECTED|PRIVATE">
> 
> - If this META tag does not appears, and if the Internet(c) 
>   string cannot be found in the BODY section of Work, then 
>   compliant software will assume that source Work is of 
>   class PRIVATE.
> 
> - PUBLIC and PROTECTED sources MUST be copied by 
>   compliants servers or clients, based on Technology rules only.
> 
> - PRIVATE sources MAY be copied compliants servers or clients,
>   based on the specific end-user's configuration.
> 
> === Section 3- Copyright declaration of Protected Works
> 
> Based on the PROTECTED meta-tag, the following Internet(C) 
> declarations MAY be auto-generated by compliant servers 
> or clients.
> 
> When the site URL and the work URL belong to same domain,
> the human-readable declaration MUST be:
> 
>   Internet(c) (date) (author-of-the-work) (URL of the work)
>   All rights reserved in all countries.
> 
> When the site URL and the Work URL do NOT belong to the same domain 
> (that is: for all copies/translations/derivations)
> the human-readable declaration MUST be:
> 
>   Internet(c) (date) (owner of Web site/Directory Service)
>   With Internet(c) license from (author-of-the-source-work)
>   All rights reserved in all countries.
> 
> .... etc, etc..
> 
> 
> Voila my compliant signature:
> 
> Internet(c) 2003 I.R.Maturana (http://internet-copyright.org)
> All rights reserved in all countries and all languages
> 
> (I registered this URL 2 days ago :)
>  Incredible: It was never registered as .ORG before ! !:-D))))
> 
> ========
> 
> I do not know if "using Internet" is an implied license.
> 
> However, there is no need to ask authorization to apply 
> the Internet Specifications like RFCs.
> 
> And I am sure this kind of RFC would make sense for 
> lawyers, on any country. :)
> 
> 
> I.R.Maturana -- http://www.in3activa.org
> (LPT-ESv1r3 - http://www.in3activa.org/doc/es/LPT-ES.html)
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _______________________________________________
> Copyvisuales-actitud mailing list
> Copyvisuales-actitud en lists.ourproject.org
> http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/copyvisuales-actitud