[Copyvisuales-actitud] RV: Protected Scope for Internet(c)
Works (was:Kelly v. Arriba Soft )
Vicente J. Ruiz Jurado
vjrj en ourproject.org
Mar Ago 5 01:34:52 CEST 2003
Pues enhorabuena.
Se le puede dar difusión entiendo ¿no?
Un fuerte saludo,
Vicente
El jue, 31-07-2003 a las 22:52, I.R.Maturana escribió:
> Aca va la presentacion en sociedad de la Internet(c)
> en la lista
> 'CNI-COPYRIGHT -- Copyright & Intellectual Property'
>
> A ver si traduzco al frances para este fin de semana
> y lo mando tambien al grupo de la LAL
>
> Saludos - NAtxo
>
>
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: I.R.Maturana [mailto:irm en in3activa.com]
> Enviado el: jueves, 31 de julio de 2003 22:27
> Para: 'CNI-COPYRIGHT -- Copyright & Intellectual Property'
> Asunto: Protected Scope for Internet(c) Works (was:Kelly v. Arriba Soft
> )
>
>
>
> Internet Specifications MAY have statutory force
> This thread made me thinking it would be plausible to
> write a RFC designed for licensing conventions.
>
>
> ======== Request For Comments:
>
> Internet(c) Declaration for Protected Works on Internet
>
> Syntax:
>
> <meta name="copyright-scope" content="PUBLIC|PROTECTED|PRIVATE">
>
> Human readable auto-generated declaration:
>
> Internet(c) (date) (author-of-the-work-as-published)
> All rights reserved in all countries.
>
> Summary:
>
> As a logical evolution of the Internet Technology
> this draft defines a Protected Scope on Internet.
>
> Authors who publish their Works on Internet under this
> Protected scope do allow copy, translation, and basic
> adaptation of their works, on Internet only.
>
> Outside the Internet scope, the Protected Works are
> considered Private works, with no prejudice on the
> Author's Private rights in all countries.
>
> This draft introduces a new META tag to allow filtering
> of Works, based on the end-user configuration of
> compliant software clients.
>
> An human readable Internet(c) Declaration is also
> proposed, and it may be auto-generated by compliant
> software clients.
>
> === Section 1: Internet Scope and Definitions
>
> On Internet scope:
>
> - PUBLIC sources are public domain sources and have universal
> scope;
>
> - PROTECTED sources are Works using the PROTECTED meta-tag
> or the Internet(c) declaration somewhere in the body.
> They have Internet-only scope;
>
> - PRIVATE sources are Works with a strict (c) declaration
> and have private-only scope.
>
>
> Outside Internet scope:
>
> - There is only 2 Work classes: PUBLIC or PRIVATE.
> - PROTECTED sources are defined as PRIVATE.
>
>
> === Section 2- Introducing a new specific META tag to HTML
>
> In the HEAD section:
>
> <meta name="copyright-scope" content="PUBLIC|PRoTECTED|PRIVATE">
>
> - If this META tag does not appears, and if the Internet(c)
> string cannot be found in the BODY section of Work, then
> compliant software will assume that source Work is of
> class PRIVATE.
>
> - PUBLIC and PROTECTED sources MUST be copied by
> compliants servers or clients, based on Technology rules only.
>
> - PRIVATE sources MAY be copied compliants servers or clients,
> based on the specific end-user's configuration.
>
> === Section 3- Copyright declaration of Protected Works
>
> Based on the PROTECTED meta-tag, the following Internet(C)
> declarations MAY be auto-generated by compliant servers
> or clients.
>
> When the site URL and the work URL belong to same domain,
> the human-readable declaration MUST be:
>
> Internet(c) (date) (author-of-the-work) (URL of the work)
> All rights reserved in all countries.
>
> When the site URL and the Work URL do NOT belong to the same domain
> (that is: for all copies/translations/derivations)
> the human-readable declaration MUST be:
>
> Internet(c) (date) (owner of Web site/Directory Service)
> With Internet(c) license from (author-of-the-source-work)
> All rights reserved in all countries.
>
> .... etc, etc..
>
>
> Voila my compliant signature:
>
> Internet(c) 2003 I.R.Maturana (http://internet-copyright.org)
> All rights reserved in all countries and all languages
>
> (I registered this URL 2 days ago :)
> Incredible: It was never registered as .ORG before ! !:-D))))
>
> ========
>
> I do not know if "using Internet" is an implied license.
>
> However, there is no need to ask authorization to apply
> the Internet Specifications like RFCs.
>
> And I am sure this kind of RFC would make sense for
> lawyers, on any country. :)
>
>
> I.R.Maturana -- http://www.in3activa.org
> (LPT-ESv1r3 - http://www.in3activa.org/doc/es/LPT-ES.html)
>
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _______________________________________________
> Copyvisuales-actitud mailing list
> Copyvisuales-actitud en lists.ourproject.org
> http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/copyvisuales-actitud