Re: [P2P-F] Center for a Stateless Society » Commentary
sounds like our good mutualist friend, Kevin Carson, would write this .. On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Bryan Hugill <[email protected]>wrote:
In case you haven't already seen this, I think you'll enjoy reading this commentary :) Especially the final two paragraphs:
"Domestically, I think Wikileaks, The Pirate Bay, Anonymous and Bitcoin’s first essay at an encrypted currency were the first weak tremors of what will become a 9.0 earthquake shaking all authoritarian hierarchies to their foundations. What emerges, in the aftermath of the long series of earthquakes, will be decentralized and networked, and largely beyond the control of whatever remains of the hollowed out states and corporations.
Regardless of all the powers asserted in Executive Orders, “National Security Doctrines” that sound like a Thousand Year Reich, and corporate attempts to put the entire world under a DRM Curtain, their authoritarian claims will ultimately be about as efficacious as the edicts of the Emperor Norton." Cheers, Bryan
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Center for a Stateless Society» Commentary <[email protected]> Date: 14 September 2011 02:37 Subject: Center for a Stateless Society » Commentary To: [email protected]
** Center for a Stateless Society » Commentary <http://c4ss.org> <http://fusion.google.com/add?source=atgs&feedurl=http://feeds.feedburner.com/c4sscommentary> ------------------------------
Reflections From Airstrip Two<http://feedproxy.google.com/%7Er/c4sscommentary/%7E3/h5AQbVc0VeE/8312?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email>
Posted: 12 Sep 2011 10:09 PM PDT
During the recent memorial of the September 11 attacks, I heard a lot of discussion by people remembering where they were and how they felt when they first heard news of the attack on the World Trade Center. I remember it very vividly myself.
I was awakened by my clock radio while the local morning DJs were still excitedly discussing the plane impact on the first tower. Before long, another plane hit the second tower. It became pretty clear then that the first one hadn’t been an accident, and that some sort of terrorist attack was underway.
My first thought wasn’t fear of the terrorists. I didn’t think “Oh, my God — what will they do next?” I didn’t fear for my safety or that of my loved ones. My first thought was that federal law enforcement and the intelligence community would drag out their Christmas list of police state legislation that they didn’t get passed after the Oklahoma City bombing, and that Congress would probably rubber stamp it. My second thought was that George Bush would get a blank check for any war he wanted, anywhere in the world, in the name of fighting terrorism; “terrorism” would replace the previous fig leaves of “International Communism” and “narcotrafficking” as an all-purpose justification for attacking any country that looked crossways at global corporate rule. After that, my thoughts turned closer to home. “Another wave of attacks like this,” I thought, “and my red card from the I.W.W. will get me a bunk with the other ‘subversives’ being detained without charge.”
The next several weeks, with the flag-waving and hysteria, struck me as unbridled lunacy. Americans, as usual in wartime, stopped exercising the skepticism of authority that is our defining feature and instead began acting like Good Germans. When Tom Daschle said “there’s no daylight between us and President Bush,” and Dan Rather said “tell me where to line up, Mr. President,” I wanted to spit on the floor. When USA PATRIOT passed, I wondered if the formal powers conferred on Bush were greater than those in the Reichstag Enabling Act.
Over the past ten years, if the clampdown hasn’t been as nightmarish as I feared, it’s still been massive: the whole security-industrial complex around Homeland Security, the TSA and their contractors; USA PATRIOT, warrantless wiretapping, and the use of “national security letters” for purposes entirely unrelated to terrorism; the wars all over the globe, and the doubling of “Defense” spending; extraordinary rendition and torture at Gitmo, Abu Ghraib, Baghram and CIA black sites all over the world. It’s like the Paul Verhoeven version of Starship Troopers — with “Freedom fries” for all.
There has been an enormous ratcheting upward of state power — sufficient to cause one email correspondent, the leader of a prominent libertarian organization, to express private despair that human liberty might be on the way to being extinguished in a new Dark Age of totalitarian barbarism.
I’m more optimistic. I don’t think the state will become any less authoritarian in its intent or policies, but its grasp will weaken faster than its reach extends. There is a breathtaking future in people taking advantage of new technical possibilities for rendering the state’s laws unenforceable and living as we want below its radar.
In the purely military realm, I have a hunch that the possibilities for cheap anti-ship missiles capable of taking out aircraft carriers (and other comparatively cheap “assassin’s mace” weapons with ROIs of 100,000% in terms of the value of the targets they take out) will continue to stay several steps ahead of attempts to counter them. If so, agile networked asymmetric war will acquire the same kind of generational advantage over the Sole Remaining Superpower’s legacy forces that the U.S. had over the Soviet bloc thirty years ago.
Domestically, I think Wikileaks, The Pirate Bay, Anonymous and Bitcoin’s first essay at an encrypted currency were the first weak tremors of what will become a 9.0 earthquake shaking all authoritarian hierarchies to their foundations. What emerges, in the aftermath of the long series of earthquakes, will be decentralized and networked, and largely beyond the control of whatever remains of the hollowed out states and corporations.
Regardless of all the powers asserted in Executive Orders, “National Security Doctrines” that sound like a Thousand Year Reich, and corporate attempts to put the entire world under a DRM Curtain, their authoritarian claims will ultimately be about as efficacious as the edicts of the Emperor Norton. You are subscribed to email updates from Center for a Stateless Society» Commentary <http://c4ss.org> To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now<http://feedburner.google.com/fb/a/mailunsubscribe?k=OHa3H4WPTKOd7NTpoTjJmITqEwQ> . Email delivery powered by Google Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610
-- P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net Connect: http://p2pfoundation.ning.com; Discuss: http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation Updates: http://del.icio.us/mbauwens; http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens; http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens
Re-rooting Digital Culture - Media Art Ecologies. ISEA. 2011. The ideas for this interdisciplinary panel will explore the relationship between digital culture and climate change, developing themes adopted in grass-roots, emerging and established practices in art, design, activism and science. http://isea2011.sabanciuniv.edu/panel/re-rooting-digital-culture-media-art-e... Sunday, 18 September, 2011 - 09:00 - 10:30 Chair Person: Ruth Catlow Presenters: Helen Varley Jamieson Michel Bauwens Paula Crutchlow Location: Sabanci Center Room 6 Sabanci Center, Levent Over the last decade the awareness of anthropogenic climate change has emerged in parallel with hyper-connective digital networks. In the context of environmental and economic collapse people around the world are seeking alternative visions of prosperity and sustainable ways of living. While the legacy of the carbon fueled Industrial Revolution plays itself out, we find ourselves grappling with questions about the future implications of fast-evolving global digital infrastructure. By their very nature the new tools, networks and behaviours of productivity, exchange and cooperation between humans and machines grow and develop at an accelerated rate. The rhetoric, aesthetics, technics and associated ethical questions of digital culture are fundamentally changing social relations as well as the nature of our material existence. The ideas for this interdisciplinary panel have grown out of Furtherfield's Media Art Ecologies programme and will explore the relationship between digital culture and climate change, developing themes adopted in grass-roots, emerging and established practices in art, design, activism and science. Panelists are artists and activists whose practices address the interrelation of technological and natural processes: beings and things, individuals and multitudes, matter and patterns. They take an ecological approach that challenges growth economics and techno-consumerism and attends to the nature of co-evolving, interdependent entities and conditions; activate networks (digital, social, physical) to work with ecological themes and Free and Open processes. Furtherfield www.furtherfield.org
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 2:56 AM, Michel Bauwens <[email protected]> wrote:
sounds like our good mutualist friend, Kevin Carson, would write this ..
I would, and did -- thanks! I wound up taking out the optimistic note about Sunburn missiles sinking two or three carrier groups to the bottom of the Indian Ocean because I thought that might elicit too much hate mail. -- Kevin Carson Research Associate, Center for a Stateless Society http://c4ss.org Homebrew Industrial Revolution: A Low-Overhead Manifesto http://homebrewindustrialrevolution.wordpress.com Organization Theory: A Libertarian Perspective
And a fine piece of writing it is...congratulations! I look forward to reading your next piece! Two or three carrier groups at the bottom of the Indian Ocean wouldn't be a half bad thing, although it'd also be a terrible waste of perfectly good steel/iron that I could definitely find a good use for on the farm...better to dismantle the entire armed forces and use those resources in better, more positive and considerably more fruitful ways. That said, if the carriers had scumbag politicians, delusional economists, corporate money-grabbing pigs, and snake-in-the-grass lawyers on board, I might just be able to be convinced otherwise... Thanks again for the article though and keep up the excellent work :) All the best, Bryan On 14 September 2011 19:25, Kevin Carson < [email protected]> wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 2:56 AM, Michel Bauwens <[email protected]> wrote:
sounds like our good mutualist friend, Kevin Carson, would write this ..
I would, and did -- thanks! I wound up taking out the optimistic note about Sunburn missiles sinking two or three carrier groups to the bottom of the Indian Ocean because I thought that might elicit too much hate mail.
-- Kevin Carson Research Associate, Center for a Stateless Society http://c4ss.org Homebrew Industrial Revolution: A Low-Overhead Manifesto http://homebrewindustrialrevolution.wordpress.com Organization Theory: A Libertarian Perspective
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Bryan Hugill <[email protected]> wrote:
And a fine piece of writing it is...congratulations! I look forward to reading your next piece!
Two or three carrier groups at the bottom of the Indian Ocean wouldn't be a half bad thing, although it'd also be a terrible waste of perfectly good steel/iron that I could definitely find a good use for on the farm...better to dismantle the entire armed forces and use those resources in better, more positive and considerably more fruitful ways. That said, if the carriers had scumbag politicians, delusional economists, corporate money-grabbing pigs, and snake-in-the-grass lawyers on board, I might just be able to be convinced otherwise...
Thanks again for the article though and keep up the excellent work :)
Thanks to you too, Bryan. I'd see it as a waste for all the military and naval personnel to wind up down there, as well -- many of them are well-meaning people who've bought into the propaganda lies, really believe they are "serving their country"/"defending our freedoms," and may have joined as a result of the "unemployment draft." It would be nice for them to live long enough to realize they've swallowed a load of bullshit. -- Kevin Carson Research Associate, Center for a Stateless Society http://c4ss.org Homebrew Industrial Revolution: A Low-Overhead Manifesto http://homebrewindustrialrevolution.wordpress.com Organization Theory: A Libertarian Perspective
participants (4)
-
Bryan Hugill -
Kevin Carson -
marc garrett -
Michel Bauwens