Yup!
On 4 Aug 2016, at 12:20, Bob Haugen <[email protected]> wrote:
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 6:05 AM, Michel Bauwens <[email protected]> wrote: well, if I'm not mistaken, Orsan is the only one who depends directly on the capitalist marketplace,
Lynn and I do, too, indirectly. We live on US Social Security, which was extracted from our past paychecks. It now sorta works for us like a minimum somewhat guaranteed income, and if we live cheaply, it allows us do almost anything we want that does not cost much money.
but I do not believe that is what motivates his opposition, I find that a reductionist interpretation,
neither would I explain the non-binary approaches from the opposite reasoning, i.e. that these views are held because of a relative independence to the marketplace
I agree with Anna below, however, that enculturation in a capitalist marketplace affects everybody's outlook. You can conform in various ways, or you can resist in various ways. But it will affect you. Don't kid yourself.
I think it is possible to achieve some degree of personal transformation through struggle before the larger transformations, but it ain't easy.
these reasonings may work on aggregate for structural explanations, but they can't explain individual choices
Michel
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 3:48 AM, Anna Harris <[email protected]> wrote:
It often seems to me that the need to justify ones own position as opposed to, rather than in addition to, or including others, comes from the structural imperative to earn a living, which necessitates offering something different and therefore of value in
the market place. This is the inevitable concomitant of a capitalist economy which requires people to have something of value which they can sell to earn a living - labour, intellect, care, etc.
Anna
On 3 Aug 2016, at 21:31, Bob Haugen <[email protected]> wrote:
One of your comments resonated with me. We have pretty much abandoned seeking funding and have also stopped responding to request from other people to help them with funding. That leaves holes. But I think we gotta figure out how to support our own activities as much as possible. I know, not always possible.
We could try dues...that's what the old Nonpartisan League did and they took over North Dakota and created the state bank, among other things.
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Orsan <[email protected]> wrote:
Well I was expecting you and Peter would make this warning. And this argument is about the methodology of analysis, or as Madron put it, and Fabians would totally agree 'operational complexity management'. I think at the current point of time complexity managers has more advanced tools and infrastructures to manage the complexity that opposition forces added on the complexity created by the intra-elite struggle. On the one hand there emerges an alliance of 'delayists' (around next system project, new economy alliance, de-growth so on) and on the radical left 'acclerationists' are forming a constellation (around Negri and so on). Some from left like Michael Aalbert, and parecon, David Harvey and rabel cities, negrists or cognitive captalists 'platform cooperatvism', Eric Olin Wright and real Utopias.. are counted in the next system alliance. On the driving seat, as John Restakis prompted sometimes ago, there are networks which are funded by OAK foundation of UK Royal-state, Rockefe
llar, Ford, Soros foundation so on. These formed a founder alliance called Edge Funders, whom Michel thinks are radicals. They fund all sort of spaces, from WSF, to Left Forum, from the events Michel and Pat mentioned, to Ripess -Synergia people (social solidarity economy discourse), from TNI to all sort of movement building hubs. Yes There are contradictions every where, there is a chaos too, but also there are some orders and regularities that are telling us something, and most worrisome is no one is talking about with the fear of not getting any funding and suffer economically. That state of 'being determines the consciousness'. The more no one is willing to talk about these openly the more things go worse. That is all I wanted to say..
Orsan
On 3 aug. 2016, at 22:03, Bob Haugen <[email protected]> wrote:
I snipped the previous contents, they were overloading my email
viewer. And deleted the WSF from the distro list so they stop
complaining at me.
Dear Orsan, I agree that alliances with aspects of the powers-that-be
pose dangers. And co-optation happens. Fortunately, they don't want to
ally with me anyway, otherwise I would need to thread some of those
needles.
I would, however, repost what I understood from Peter's message. If we
are dialectical materialists, we gotta do a dialectical analysis of
all these forces and their contradictions and also and maybe
especially their internal contradictions.
And even after the revolution or transformation or whatever, there
will still be contradictions. That's life.
_______________________________________________ NetworkedLabour mailing list [email protected] http://lists.contrast.org/mailman/listinfo/networkedlabour
-- Check out the Commons Transition Plan here at: http://commonstransition.org
P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net
Updates: http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens
#82 on the (En)Rich list: http://enrichlist.org/the-complete-list/