Another debt based system this time wrapped in systems control speak and the economics is pre-1971, if not pre-1929. How having a body of knowledge that primarily based upon structural concepts minus a critical understanding of the problems that are instead declared to be out of sight is adequate mystifies me. It even attaches itself to some sort of stability objective which seems like half a snort off of an investment in neo-classical economics. That's where often the faults and flaws of one domain can be presumed to be explained away as a calculation of an engineering formula. After all, us control systems wonks can fix everything, because don't want to waste a lot time learning about economic history or principles. It is directly because neo-classical economics is positivist at its root, than every other witch doctor in the neighborhood seems to make about as much sense. Sometimes economists also use words in impressive displays, but absent of any reference. It tries use a lot of numbers and thinly meaningful metrics to not invalidate a hypothesis conflated relevance. it seems to resolve itself as a branding process, I guess. Tadit On Sun, 16 Oct 2011 13:29:29 -0400, Michel Bauwens <[email protected]> wrote:
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Marc Gauvin <[email protected]> Date: Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 12:06 AM Subject: New bibo currency site To: Michel Bauwens <[email protected]>
Hi Michel,
Just letting you know that we have a new web at www.bibocurrency.org. Please take a look and all comments are welcome.
Best regards,
Marc