-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 12/10/2011 02:20 PM, hellekin wrote:
On 12/09/2011 11:07 PM, Amjad wrote:
This is a great example of the accelerated innovation rate that could not be achieved without the enormous stack of opened and interconnected systems.
*** Or is it a great example of great enthusiasm that is wasting precious time and resources, considering serious available alternatives such as Tails, Backtrack, Dynebolic, and oh, FreeBSD and Debian. Color me skeptical.
I'd love to know some thread where this release was planned and the refused whys, "ocuppy vs etc" faqs, etc. where is it investing resources in its own besides the 'publicity'(*). I could see it good to bring gnu-linux to the people due to a medaithic trend we are getting advantatges of, but surely i won't like if that is doing the typical dispersating case (at spain at least) of every region doing their distro for schools just for gettin the property of it, so they could ask for subventions easier, so we end up having too many maintainers and too few developers because peoples are bothered with sysadmining and not with coding, which is 'overally' bad.... well, i am not willing to flame it, i am just more curious about this issue. (*) is there some OccupyCMS on the way? some occupiers were thinking in a worpdressmultiusers distro as an additional service.. we could call it occupyblogs, with not fork just packing modules, compromised with updates of them and server service... -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJO5dsoAAoJEAlfUArKi+EC2I4H/2TxyYIliQxoYGrdGAfnyhh6 8DE6wQSdS6A0MLjpM9PcmWyN56zdjvhChYU1eoKpjUZC6DA13ksCTB37XR/x5brB 8WmQkGFOFw9srQoQCJ5FzDb8H53bZJVF9ZNJoYA7VJq9wXAwnFlYXxzlhM3sSVu9 OxOYyBE68eldWtkxKCqx462rbrkyOmTpYgaE/BcIgZSqda9CSqLPQIyKsD2/poX+ Bs/aJDisL6Irgoj9sBB3sfK+/+lEyuHWorQLbpIw42iJ3YmrdklLczSsmxjTEWcE 2KUiDdZLdhwGqkYya1Id+p3/0lW5XIMl6lbvQppxPVYHKisyRHp2gI+XBsIlG3M= =0F16 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----