hi Orsan, I am personally completely overwhelmed and my moderate pushing for governance structures has not been successful, but I know Stacco in cc has been working and thinking on this lately, looking at models from enspiral, loomio and others, it would be great to formalize these processes for where they are needed, but we need help, Michel <<From: ?rsan ?enalp <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [P2P-F] Transnational and P2P Commons Transitions To: P2P Foundation mailing list <[email protected]> Message-ID: <CABcnBF6Zw57TqxeAHLLGede5ryFWjO=skSy7ySnzqRkZHizUFw@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 May be as at the beginning of every flos project the initators has to take the initiative, form a foundation to develop and promote the ideas in a stable line and grow. It was probably similar for the starting years of the P2P-F; I mean to prevent tyranny of structureless and grow, it was necessary to have a built in (semi-)hierarchy. I did produce a perspective on p2p, use value with an open code. And now it has already become much more than a floss project. At least it's impact is socialised, having a broader impacts. So the time, may be, has come for P2P-F to try to commonify its governance and re-design it accordingly. It might need time of course, and it surely is the work and decision of thecore founders, direct members, close affinities, and wider stake holders... still would be a challenging and epic experience for all of us! Orsan>> -- *Please note an intrusion wiped out my inbox on February 8; I have no record of previous communication, proposals, etc ..* P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net <http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation>Updates: http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens #82 on the (En)Rich list: http://enrichlist.org/the-complete-list/