Sounds like a plan. The only part that make me uncomfortable is that the whole point of drafting a CC/CX system under the MMT/FF economics is that it would only be a variety of "pop" economics relative to its application, not relative to the economics involved. I refuse to rely on comforting buzz words to persuade people, though the values of "community," freedom from debt, and the like are all integrated into the system. It is fully integrated with the lessons of monetary history and practice. It is intended to be a learning environment rather than fashion statement. oops that was probably "harsh," but true. Yes, it is perhaps a difficult set of concepts relative to what is familiar, but it is about economic literacy not perpetuating economic illiteracy. Tadit On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 17:29:47 -0400, Michel Bauwens <[email protected]> wrote:
here is the series of three we could publish as a series of challenges to established 'pop economics':