note : I am not stating anywhere in my reply that I deem viable or useful to partake any nuclear energy options. I do notice, since the nuclear topic has been raised, that there are different approaches, and different resources for such, used for various reasons ( often power/control related ? ) Personally, I see nuclear approaches as centralized approaches. Oil, gas and coal also potentially leading to centralized approaches of control. I prefer small scale and networked distributed approaches to energy production, preferably renewable energy ( or geothermal some claiming geothermal is not a renewable source ). On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Mark Janssen <[email protected]>wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 6:44 AM, Dante-Gabryell Monson <[email protected]> wrote:
It seems there are a few ways and materials that can be used for producing fission nuclear energy ( as opposed to fusion - for which a controversial experimental iter fusion reactor is being built in france - ).
All that misses the point: the 1st Law of Thermodynamics and the rate of consumption implied by prior history.
marcos