May 2007 - Musix-usuarios - lists.ourproject.org

Saludos desde Colombia
by José Luis Solano Ospino 06 May '07

06 May '07

Hola a todos, esperando que se encuentren muy bien. He decidido empezar a utilizar Musix, pero no sé por dónde empezar, acepto sugerencias, la idea que tenemos es grabar demos para la banda que tenemos, si nos pueden orientar al respecto les agradeceríamos mucho. tengo un micrófono conectado y todas las ganas de trabajar con este sistema operativo. Antes utilizábamos Cool Edit, pero tengo entendido que Musix maneja mejores cosas que este programa. No sé si exista algún tutorial paso a paso para hacer grabaciones de demos. Por su orientación y atención muchas gracias. Att: José Luis Solano Ospino Departamento de Diseño joselsolano(a)yahoo.com.ar Celular: (571) 300 5614506 Teléfono particular: (571) 433 11 08 Bogotá - Colombia "No te niegues a una ilusión y mucho menos al amor ya que en cada cosa, en cada momento y a cada sentimiento le corresponde una dosis de pasión" Les estoy escribiendo desde Thunderbird, es mi manejador de correo favorito,

3 3

[LAU] Re: [Freepats] Breaking silence and the road to free musicalinstruments
by Marcos Guglielmetti 06 May '07

06 May '07

El Sáb 05 May 2007 22:53, Roberto Gordo Saez escribió: | On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 03:49:34AM +1000, Mark Constable wrote: | > Wow, this is exciting news. Well, any news is good, as it's been | > very quiet on this list, but this is particularly good news. | | Indeed, it's been very quiet on this list. There are only few | contributions and based on the responses I usually get, I know that main | offenders are all those "semi-free" soundfonts out there. They are the | real evil. People do not feel urged to contribute. They are discouraged | to produce real free soundfonts. Why bother? | | Creating instruments takes a lot of time, and is difficult to do. It is | a lot easier to download one of those General MIDI soundfonts available | everywhere. But it turns out that those soundfonts are also loaded with | unlicensed samples. It is very common to recognize samples from Emu, | Roland and others inside them. | | There are many people who cares about free software, being very picky | about licenses and imposed restrictions when using software; but | surprisingly enough, this same people usually chooses to ignore the | nasty restrictions, ugly agreements and the whole copyright law for | sounds or other works beside software, turning a blind eye, just like | if the problem had never existed. I've had some strong words with some | people at Debian for this reason. | | Months ago, Mark told me about an interesting orchestral sample | collection: | http://www.soundsonline.com/EWQLSO-Platinum-Bundle-pr-EW-155PROB1.html | | For those corrupted souls like myself who have cowardly installed the | proprietary flash plugin, please hit the play button to listen the | example. This is how a high end, good digital sample collection is | supposed to sound nowadays. The first time I've listened to it, I felt a | need to cry. | | Could be possible that we ever manage to build something similar with | free samples? And even if we get the opportunity, how many years could | we need to carefully record, process, balance and fine tune such an | enormous amount of samples? Maybe 10 years, 20 years... never? I'm | unable to answer those questions, but I can say what I will do. | | I was tempted to purchase those instruments, and still I am. I've | already purchased other proprietary samples in the past. While a price | about $3000 may seem a bit high, it is not uncommon for me to spend very | high quantities of money on hobbies, toys or other recreational | activities that are much less useful than a good sample collection. It | may be not a problem for me, just I need to buy those instruments, | possibly together with other sets like the GM kit from the same site, | and I will be happy. No need for spending lots of time making free | instruments, no need to care about fine tuning, and no need to wait | forever. | | But they are NOT FREE. And I'm not referring to the PRICE, I'm referring | to the FREEDOM. And yes, this is an annoyance for me, much more than the | price. They come with a license agreement: | | "you are NOT obtaining OWNERSHIP of the sound samples - you are in fact | purchasing a LICENSE to use the sound samples within your musical | composition" [...] | | I can only use them on the operating system imposed by the manufacturer. | I can't share modifications. My own compositions are a derived product, | so they are also infected, there is also a list of conditions which are | passed to my own compositions, I'm required to use loops "in a musical | context with at least two other instruments that contribute | significantly to the composition", just to mention one particular | condition. I can't publish my compositions under certain free licenses | of my choice, because they may be incompatible with the requirements. | | The requirements themselves are common to proprietary sample collections | and digital instruments (including hardware instruments). Some of them | may have additional clauses, and may even require to pay royalties when | distributing your music commercially. They are developed to produce | proprietary music according to current commercial practices, and they | work well in this context. | | It means that composers and music enthusiasts with less resources will | be condemned to produce music that sounds poor, or to violate licenses. | Many people choose between both options, but this way things would never | change. I choose neither. | | I may purchase those samples in the future, depending on my mood; time | is a finite resource for humans. But I will always continue searching | for free instruments anyway, or I will never be completely happy. No | matter how much time will take. No matter how much of an idiot I will | look to the eyes of those people who do not see any problem, or who are | completely happy with their semi-free soundfonts or proprietary | products. I will continue to support free instruments. I'm grateful with | people who has contributed (currently only a few, it seems). Even the | simpler things like testing a soundfont or giving an opinion does | matter. Thanks to all who are interested. | | | PS: Sorry for such a political kind of email. I just had a depressing | day today... | _______________________________________________ | Freepats mailing list | Freepats(a)opensrc.org | http://opensrc.org/listinfo/freepats I liked your mail, it's one of the best I had ever readed (sorry again about my fucking english) Look: as more people uses Free Software as in freedom, there are more chances that they think about freedom I was testing you freedom piano soundfont yesterday, and I LIKE IT, we just have to include some more layers, maybe only the bright one!! (and retouch some things). I am too busy on making Musix GNU/Linux for now, but maybe I could help. And, then, we must search for students at university, artistic schools, etc., that could study and make soundfonts as a part of their studies... this would be the best I think, so , experiences like Gustavo Chico in Spain should be an example about how we can make it if we collaborate: we need more people thinking about freedom, and, this issue needs some work and time. -- Marcos Guglielmetti * Director del desarrollo de Musix GNU+Linux, 100% Software Libre * Colabora: http://www.musix.org.ar/wiki/index.php/Musix1.0tasks * CD Download: (http://www.musix.org.ar/en/) * Videos, programas, etc.: ftp://musix.ourproject.org/pub/musix/ * Reporte de errores: https://www.musix.org.ar/wiki/index.php?title=Problemas-Bugs *IRC: #musix channel on freenode * http://autosus.wordpress.com/ «No te tomes en serio nada que no te haga reír» [un amigo de E. Galeano] ... tampoco sigas al pie de la letra ninguna de estas frases... _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-user

1 0

Re: [Freepats] Breaking silence and the road to free musical instruments
by Marcos Guglielmetti 05 May '07

05 May '07

El Sáb 05 May 2007 22:53, Roberto Gordo Saez escribió: | On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 03:49:34AM +1000, Mark Constable wrote: | > Wow, this is exciting news. Well, any news is good, as it's been | > very quiet on this list, but this is particularly good news. | | Indeed, it's been very quiet on this list. There are only few | contributions and based on the responses I usually get, I know that main | offenders are all those "semi-free" soundfonts out there. They are the | real evil. People do not feel urged to contribute. They are discouraged | to produce real free soundfonts. Why bother? | | Creating instruments takes a lot of time, and is difficult to do. It is | a lot easier to download one of those General MIDI soundfonts available | everywhere. But it turns out that those soundfonts are also loaded with | unlicensed samples. It is very common to recognize samples from Emu, | Roland and others inside them. | | There are many people who cares about free software, being very picky | about licenses and imposed restrictions when using software; but | surprisingly enough, this same people usually chooses to ignore the | nasty restrictions, ugly agreements and the whole copyright law for | sounds or other works beside software, turning a blind eye, just like | if the problem had never existed. I've had some strong words with some | people at Debian for this reason. | | Months ago, Mark told me about an interesting orchestral sample | collection: | http://www.soundsonline.com/EWQLSO-Platinum-Bundle-pr-EW-155PROB1.html | | For those corrupted souls like myself who have cowardly installed the | proprietary flash plugin, please hit the play button to listen the | example. This is how a high end, good digital sample collection is | supposed to sound nowadays. The first time I've listened to it, I felt a | need to cry. | | Could be possible that we ever manage to build something similar with | free samples? And even if we get the opportunity, how many years could | we need to carefully record, process, balance and fine tune such an | enormous amount of samples? Maybe 10 years, 20 years... never? I'm | unable to answer those questions, but I can say what I will do. | | I was tempted to purchase those instruments, and still I am. I've | already purchased other proprietary samples in the past. While a price | about $3000 may seem a bit high, it is not uncommon for me to spend very | high quantities of money on hobbies, toys or other recreational | activities that are much less useful than a good sample collection. It | may be not a problem for me, just I need to buy those instruments, | possibly together with other sets like the GM kit from the same site, | and I will be happy. No need for spending lots of time making free | instruments, no need to care about fine tuning, and no need to wait | forever. | | But they are NOT FREE. And I'm not referring to the PRICE, I'm referring | to the FREEDOM. And yes, this is an annoyance for me, much more than the | price. They come with a license agreement: | | "you are NOT obtaining OWNERSHIP of the sound samples - you are in fact | purchasing a LICENSE to use the sound samples within your musical | composition" [...] | | I can only use them on the operating system imposed by the manufacturer. | I can't share modifications. My own compositions are a derived product, | so they are also infected, there is also a list of conditions which are | passed to my own compositions, I'm required to use loops "in a musical | context with at least two other instruments that contribute | significantly to the composition", just to mention one particular | condition. I can't publish my compositions under certain free licenses | of my choice, because they may be incompatible with the requirements. | | The requirements themselves are common to proprietary sample collections | and digital instruments (including hardware instruments). Some of them | may have additional clauses, and may even require to pay royalties when | distributing your music commercially. They are developed to produce | proprietary music according to current commercial practices, and they | work well in this context. | | It means that composers and music enthusiasts with less resources will | be condemned to produce music that sounds poor, or to violate licenses. | Many people choose between both options, but this way things would never | change. I choose neither. | | I may purchase those samples in the future, depending on my mood; time | is a finite resource for humans. But I will always continue searching | for free instruments anyway, or I will never be completely happy. No | matter how much time will take. No matter how much of an idiot I will | look to the eyes of those people who do not see any problem, or who are | completely happy with their semi-free soundfonts or proprietary | products. I will continue to support free instruments. I'm grateful with | people who has contributed (currently only a few, it seems). Even the | simpler things like testing a soundfont or giving an opinion does | matter. Thanks to all who are interested. | | | PS: Sorry for such a political kind of email. I just had a depressing | day today... | _______________________________________________ | Freepats mailing list | Freepats(a)opensrc.org | http://opensrc.org/listinfo/freepats I liked your mail, it's one of the best I had ever readed (sorry again about my fucking english) Look: as more people uses Free Software as in freedom, there are more chances that they think about freedom I was testing you freedom piano soundfont yesterday, and I LIKE IT, we just have to include some more layers, maybe only the bright one!! (and retouch some things). I am too busy on making Musix GNU/Linux for now, but maybe I could help. And, then, we must search for students at university, artistic schools, etc., that could study and make soundfonts as a part of their studies... this would be the best I think, so , experiences like Gustavo Chico in Spain should be an example about how we can make it if we collaborate: we need more people thinking about freedom, and, this issue needs some work and time. -- Marcos Guglielmetti * Director del desarrollo de Musix GNU+Linux, 100% Software Libre * Colabora: http://www.musix.org.ar/wiki/index.php/Musix1.0tasks * CD Download: (http://www.musix.org.ar/en/) * Videos, programas, etc.: ftp://musix.ourproject.org/pub/musix/ * Reporte de errores: https://www.musix.org.ar/wiki/index.php?title=Problemas-Bugs *IRC: #musix channel on freenode * http://autosus.wordpress.com/ «No te tomes en serio nada que no te haga reír» [un amigo de E. Galeano] ... tampoco sigas al pie de la letra ninguna de estas frases...

1 0

Instalar Musix 1.0 en discho duro viejo pórtatil
by Doménec Bernad 05 May '07

05 May '07

Hola he instalado el CD LIVE musix 1.0 con exito y he podido ver el escritorio kdm y trabajar con él, sin embargo al instalarlo en el disco duro me dice que lo he instalado satisfactoriamente, però cuando arranco no aparece el entorno gráfico, da problemas con X, solo puedo verlo en modo texto, creo que es un problema con la tarjeta gráfica, ATI 3D 4mb, 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Rage Mobility P/M AGP 2x (rev 64) (prog-if 00 [VGA]) Subsystem: Toshiba America Info Systems: Unknown device ff00 Flags: bus master, stepping, medium devsel, latency 66, IRQ 10 Memory at fd000000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16M] I/O ports at 2000 [size=256] Memory at fc100000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K] Expansion ROM at <unassigned> [disabled] [size=128K] Capabilities: [50] AGP version 1.0 Capabilities: [5c] Power Management version 1 es un pórtatil antiguo: http://digilander.libero.it/CyberPenguin/howto_Satellite1710cds.html TOSHIBA Satelite 1710cds Celeron 600 – 160 Mb sdram (32 fix + 128 exp) – 6 Gb HD – 1 fdd – cdrom 24x – winmoden 56k – display lcd hpa 12.1' – 2 usb 1.1 He bajado los drivers de la tarjeta gráfica para linux però como root no logro acceder al CDROM donde los he copiado para modificar la configuración gráfica. Que puedo hacer para que funcione en modo gráfico pues me gustaria utilizar el viejo pórtatil para utilizarlo con la guitarra. Gracias de antemano. Doménec

2 1

lanzamiento musix justo ahora :-)
by Ricardo M. MORALES 05 May '07

05 May '07

finalmente ... para quienes esperaban seguirla en línea, como varios de nosotros (acá tengo algunos mirando) :-) desde hace unos minutos empezó a transmitirse en vivo en: http://www.ututo.org/interactivetv/index2.html el lanzamiento de la esperada versión 1.0 de musix :-) http://www.musix.org.ar/ chaucito :-)

1 0

me respondo yo mismo
by kiki lumbreras 05 May '07

05 May '07

Ah, justo después de enviar el anterior mail pe pongo en HD i encuentro la varita mágica en el escritorio MUSIXCONTROL i........ efectivamente con dos clicks NETWORK pestaña de LOCALNETWORK ADSL IP CABLE...... i hala a descargar paquetes Bueno, al menos me ha servido para poder felicitar el trabajo (cosa que en el otro no hice por las prisas) de esta estupenda distribución mil gracias Kiki ____________________________________________________________________________________ LLama Gratis a cualquier PC del Mundo. Llamadas a fijos y móviles desde 1 céntimo por minuto. http://es.voice.yahoo.com Ah, justo después de enviar el anterior mail pe pongo en HD i encuentro la varita mágica en el escritorio MUSIXCONTROL i........ efectivamente con dos clicks NETWORK pestaña de LOCALNETWORK ADSL IP CABLE...... i hala a descargar paquetes Bueno, al menos me ha servido para poder felicitar el trabajo (cosa que en el otro no hice por las prisas) de esta estupenda distribución mil gracias http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/mesg/tsmileys/y.gif Kiki http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/mesg/tsmileys/l.gif LLama Gratis a cualquier PC del Mundo. Llamadas a fijos y móviles desde 1 céntimo por minuto. http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail/es/tagline/messenger/*http://es.voice.yahoo.com/ http://es.voice.yahoo.com

1 0

[LAU] Rosegarden 1.5.1 for Musix (Debian Etch package)
by Marcos Guglielmetti 04 May '07

04 May '07

http://www.musix.org.ar/wordpress/?p=133 Rosegarden 1.5.1 for Musix (Debian Etch package) Thanks to Carlos Pino for the backport of Rosegarden 1.5.1 for Debian/Etch, now you can install it from the Musix GNU+Linux repositories. Add these lines to /etc/apt/sources.list : # Musix GNU+Linux deb ftp://musix.ourproject.org/pub/musix/deb/ ./ Then you can just type: apt-get update apt-get install rosegarden More info: http://www.rosegardenmusic.com -- Marcos Guglielmetti * Director del desarrollo de Musix GNU+Linux, 100% Software Libre * Colabora: http://www.musix.org.ar/wiki/index.php/Musix1.0tasks * CD Download: (http://www.musix.org.ar/en/) * Videos, programas, etc.: ftp://musix.ourproject.org/pub/musix/ * Reporte de errores: https://www.musix.org.ar/wiki/index.php?title=Problemas-Bugs *IRC: #musix channel on freenode * http://autosus.wordpress.com/ «No te tomes en serio nada que no te haga reír» [un amigo de E. Galeano] ... tampoco sigas al pie de la letra ninguna de estas frases... _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-user

1 0

Re: Resumen de Musix-usuarios, Vol 14, Envío 15
by nestor ciravolo 04 May '07

04 May '07

NADA... QUERÍA DESEAR MERD PARA MAÑANA!! SALU2 NÉSTOR musix-usuarios-request(a)lists.ourproject.org escribió: Envie los mensajes para la lista Musix-usuarios a musix-usuarios(a)lists.ourproject.org Para subscribirse o anular su subscripción a través de WEB https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/musix-usuarios O por correo electrónico, enviando un mensaje con el texto "help" en el asunto (subject) o en el cuerpo a: musix-usuarios-request(a)lists.ourproject.org Puede contactar con el responsable de la lista escribiendo a: musix-usuarios-owner(a)lists.ourproject.org Si responde a algún contenido de este mensaje, por favor, edite la linea del asunto (subject) para que el texto sea mas especifico que: "Re: Contents of Musix-usuarios digest...". Ademas, por favor, incluya en la respuesta solo aquellas partes del mensaje a las que esta respondiendo. Asuntos del día: 1. Re: mensaje de error del kernel 2.6.21-rt1 en debian etch (Carlos Pino) 2. Re: buenas....ardour2, placas y demas (Carlos Pino) 3. Re: Imposible acceder a kodak easyshare C533 (Carlos Pino) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 09:37:41 +0200 From: Carlos Pino Subject: Re: [Musix-usuarios] mensaje de error del kernel 2.6.21-rt1 en debian etch To: Lista de usuarios de Musix Message-ID: <463AE2C5.2060606(a)gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Marcos Guglielmetti escribió: > El Jue 03 May 2007 20:27, Carlos Pino escribió: > | Hola , instalé el kernel > | http://linux.ilmainen.net/musix/linux-2.6.21-rt1/linux-image-2.6.21-rt1_2. > |6.21-rt1-10.00.Custom_i386.deb > > Gracias por el reporte. > > ¿El kernel 2.6.21 (sin rt) no da ese error? > Ese no lo probé , ¿incorpora el parche de Ingo Molnar? Lo probaré de todas formas . > Digo, porque debería andar tan bien como ese en cuanto a latencia y esas > cosas. Teóricamente el método realtime-lsm de ese kernel que instalaste no es > mejor que le método basado en otorgar capacidades de realtime mediante > libpam, que es el que usamos con el kernel 2.6.21 ¿alguien lo ha comprobado? > > Bueno , en relidad no usé el módulo realtime-lsm , que sé que está compilado también. Últimamente utilizo la opción de libpam ya que me da buenos resultados . > Si también 2.6.21 da el error que muestras, yo diría que esperemos a que haya > otro kernel estable compilado, dado que se están haciendo parches para 2.6.21 > bastante rápido, y no sé si vale la pena reportar el error. Aún así, si > quieres reportarlo a LKML, adelante, quizá sirva de algo, pienso. > ¿Crees que ahí tendrán en cuenta el kernel con el parche de Molnar ? > Saludos > Saludos. -- Carlos. ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 10:05:32 +0200 From: Carlos Pino Subject: Re: [Musix-usuarios] buenas....ardour2, placas y demas To: Lista de usuarios de Musix Message-ID: <463AE94C.3020008(a)gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Marcos Guglielmetti escribió: > El Vie 04 May 2007 00:30, Fernando Toledo escribió: > > > Las M-Audio salen mucho menos que eso y son bastante pro. con 400 dólares te > comprás una placa grosísima, pero no sé cual, Quizá conviene una consola > Firewire con 12 entradas/salidas, comolas Phonic esas, pero no sé si están > bien probadas.... está bravo el tema ahí, existen drivers, freebob y toda la > bola, pero no sé si andan > > > Había un interesante correo del desarrollador de Freebob que convendría tener en cuenta a la hora de comprar dispositivos firewire. http://lalists.stanford.edu/lau/2007/04/0016.html Saludos. -- Carlos. ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 11:28:34 +0200 From: Carlos Pino Subject: Re: [Musix-usuarios] Imposible acceder a kodak easyshare C533 To: Lista de usuarios de Musix Message-ID: <463AFCC2.5060206(a)gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Marcos Guglielmetti escribió: > El Jue 03 May 2007 20:32, Carlos Pino escribió: > | Marcos Guglielmetti escribió: > | > más con Ardour 2.0 Stable ¿qué más quieren? > | > | ¿rosegarden-1.5.1 ? > | > > jeje, no tienen paz!!! > > > Y bueno, ya alguien hará un backport a Debian /Etch, pienso que en estos meses > que vienen se va a utilizar mucho Debian/Stable, porque ahora las versiones > de los programas multimedia son muy funcionales, así que habrá gente > empaquetando de todo... veremos. > > jeje , incansables .... La cosa es que Rosegarden nunca me anduvo del todo fino hasta esta última versión , y la verdad me estoy aficionando a él , aunque a veces me da algún que otro disgusto (creo que es cosa de algunos plugins) , esta nueva versión está muy mejorada en cuanto a estabilidad con respecto de las anteriores . Asi que si usted gusta.... ahí va un backport para Etch . ftp://ia350635.us.archive.org/3/items/rosegrarden-1.5.1-etch/rosegarden_1.5… Saludos . -- Carlos . ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Musix GNU+Linux - www.musix.org.ar Musix-usuarios mailing list Musix-usuarios(a)lists.ourproject.org https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/musix-usuarios Fin de Resumen de Musix-usuarios, Vol 14, Envío 15 ************************************************** --------------------------------- Preguntá. Respondé. Descubrí. Todo lo que querías saber, y lo que ni imaginabas, está en Yahoo! Respuestas (Beta). Probalo ya!

1 0

Suerte en la Presentacion de mañana...
by Daniel Vidal Chornat 04 May '07

04 May '07

Saludos... Pues eso... Mucha suerte... Deslumbradlos... Salud y mucha mucha suerte!!!! _________________________________________________________________ Horóscopo, tarot, numerología... Escucha lo que te dicen los astros. http://astrocentro.msn.es/

3 2

RE: [Musix-usuarios] Imposible acceder a kodak easyshare C533
by Daniel Vidal Chornat 04 May '07

04 May '07

Saludos En este link hay informacion sobre el tema... parece que tiene solucion aunque no por completo. http://www.ubuntu-es.org/index.php?q=node/33043 Os pego el contenido porque es cortito... "Cree un nuevo hilo porque el del problema estaba cerrado. Yo también me compré la camara Kodak Easyshare C533 y me encontré con la maldita sorpresa de que no parece tener soporte para Linux. Al enchufarla al USB me detectaba un nuevo medio, pero al ponerle que lo abra tiraba un error y no me mostraba el contenido de la memoria. Por suerte me puse a probar: al principio instalé el digikam, me reconocía la camara, pero al descargar las fotos daba error. Entonces probé con el f-spot: funcionó perfecto, solo tengo que poner "Importar", seleccionar la camara, y me permite descargar tanto las fotos como los videos. Sigo sin poder montar la camara en Konqueror, pero ya puedo bajar todo al rígido que es lo importante. Los dos programas están en repositorios de mi Debian Etch, por lo que seguramente también estan en los de Ubuntu. Espero que a alguien le sirva esta información." Salud y Suerte!!!! >From: Pablo Sastre <sastrejuanpablo(a)yahoo.com.ar> >Reply-To: Lista de usuarios de Musix <musix-usuarios(a)lists.ourproject.org> >To: Musix <musix-usuarios(a)lists.ourproject.org> >Subject: [Musix-usuarios] Imposible acceder a kodak easyshare C533 >Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 16:47:37 +0200 > >Hola; > >Un amigo; al que le instale Musix :-D ; no puede acceder a su camara kodak >easyshare C533; el tema es que la intento montar con el script de >Gillblack; >y no me muestra el contenido; si que tiene dos memorias; osea, me genera >sda1 >y 2. >Estoy googleando para ver que encuentro por mi lado > >-- > >Juan Pablo Sastre >* Usuario / colaborador de Musix GNU+Linux, 100% Software Libre >* Descarga el CD de Musix y reemplaza tu Windows: http://www.musix.org.ar >* Videos, y otras cosas en: ftp://musix.ourproject.org/pub/musix/ >* Reporta errores a: >https://www.musix.org.ar/wiki/index.php?title=Problemas-Bugs > >_______________________________________________ >Musix GNU+Linux - www.musix.org.ar >Musix-usuarios mailing list >Musix-usuarios(a)lists.ourproject.org >https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/musix-usuarios _________________________________________________________________ ¿Estás pensando en cambiar de coche? Todas los modelos de serie y extras en MSN Motor. http://motor.msn.es/researchcentre/

4 8