1 Jan
2014
1 Jan
'14
1:18 p.m.
On 12/31/13, Frank Fischer wrote:
Evil only binds to `redo` not to any specific undo-tree function (undo-tree remaps `redo` to `undo-tree-redo` or so). This function is also available from other packages, i.e. `redo` or `redo+` (IIRC the latter is preferable nowadays, available from Emacswiki). AFAIK no `redo` function is available in plain Emacs.
However, if `undo-tree` is available Evil will load it. This is questionable, of course.
Thanks for explaining it. Still wrapping around my head Emacs default undo/redo system, so I was thinking, does it make sense to make 'redo' behaves like default Emacs version, when undo-tree-mode was disabled? If I got it right, 'redo' will be the same as 'undo'?
Frank
Best, Sanel