23 Jul
2010
23 Jul
'10
2:04 p.m.
On 2010-07-23 15:18, Štěpán Němec wrote:
Vimpulse uses remapping at a few places so I thought I'd mention that, as AFAIK Vegard tries to keep things XEmacs-compatible (and has my full moral support ;-D).
Yeah, I'm aware that XEmacs lacks remapping. The `vimpulse-remap' macro tries to make do by storing remappings in an association list, whence they can be retrieved by a specific function like `vimpulse-operator-remapping'. There is no general solution.
I'd love to be using XEmacs (see the recent copyright thread on this list), but it seems to only work reasonably well out-of-the-box in the terminal for me.
Are there any technical advantages to using XEmacs nowadays? -- Vegard