On 20 Aug 2011, José A. Romero L. wrote:
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 1:13 AM, Michael Markert <[email protected]> wrote:
On 20 Aug 2011, York Zhao wrote:
I believe ediff-mode should be in emacs state.
I think so, too.
And here are some more: (...)
Shouldn't this be done the other way around? I mean - wouldn't a list of modes in normal state (with emacs state being the default) make more sense than a list of modes *not* in normal state?
This was discussed here as well: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.vim-emulation/945 and resulted in the addition of `evil-default-state'. But I don't think it's useful to change for users unless a list of normal state modes is included as well. I'm not sure it would be less work to change the default state to emacs and gather normal state modes instead of emacs state modes. <tongue-in-cheek> And a vim-emulation that defaults to a non-vim state? Come on! </tongue-in-cheek> Michael