1 Mar
2011
1 Mar
'11
10:10 p.m.
On 2011-03-01 18:41 +0100, Tim Harper wrote:
Perhaps it's just me, but if it's a choice between interoperability with Emacs at the cost of 97% compatibility with vim, and 100% compatibility with them at the cost of reduced interoperability with Emacs commands, I would prefer sacrificing the vim compatibility. If 100% vim compatibility were important to me, I would use vim.
Well put. I totally agree. -- Vegard