Re: ediff-mode should be in emacs state

On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 1:13 AM, Michael Markert <[email protected]> wrote:

On 20 Aug 2011, York Zhao wrote:

...

I believe ediff-mode should be in emacs state.

I think so, too.

And here are some more: (...)

Shouldn't this be done the other way around? I mean - wouldn't a list of modes in normal state (with emacs state being the default) make more sense than a list of modes *not* in normal state? Cheers, -- José A. Romero L. escherdragon at gmail "We who cut mere stones must always be envisioning cathedrals." (Quarry worker's creed)