On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 06:09:31PM +0000, Vegard Øye wrote:
Why not (version< "23.2" emacs-version) instead of the clumsy matching and type conversion?
Nice. How does one find these things?
Heh... dunno -- whatever works for you; Emacs' built-in documentation system (the `describe-', `apropos-', `find-' functions) and source-reading come to mind (that's what I use, anyway; actually I nearly never use the apropos functions -- just tab-completing a function name argument to the other ones often gives enough enlightenment).
Not mentioning the fact that your comment suggests the exact opposite of what the code actually does.
Fixed in commit [e304f2d833].
Hm... it is? I still see the same old contradiction -- the code does (roughly) the same, and you didn't change the comment in that commit either. Štěpán