Cool! Thanks :)
This is at least not easy to achieve.
Then is ok as it is definitely not must-have feature :) And thank you for detail explanation. Regards, Sanel On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Frank Fischer <[email protected]> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 02:49:42PM +0100, Sanel Zukan wrote:
Hi,
Here is patch for sorted buffer names when ':ls" was given. I often use this command and when you have a bit of loaded files with various additional modes that opens own buffers, things becomes quite messy.
This patch will apply sort on buffer names, so hidden buffers (those with " *xxx*") will be put first, then modes specific buffers (e.g. "*xxx*") and then goes files/directories.
Thanks, applied in 1689501f.
One nice feature would be numbering buffers, just like Vim does, so each buffer can be opened with ":b<n>". What do you guys think about it?
This is at least not easy to achieve. The problem is that Emacs does not (AFAIK) assign unique numbers to the buffers. Instead Emacs manages a buffer-list which is rearranged each time some buffer gets active (it is moved to the front of this list). Therefore there is no standard way to identify buffers by number.
Frank
_______________________________________________ implementations-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/implementations-list