Date: Sun, 9 May 2010 20:40:36 +0200 From: [email protected]
I still see the same old contradiction -- the code does (roughly) the same, and you didn't change the comment in that commit either.
Duh! I have a habit of writing the value to be compared against first, but <'s "less than" moniker presupposes the opposite order. I.e., (= 2 x) ; is x equal to 2? (< x 2) ; is x less than 2? The comment, which uses infix notation, has it right. (The reason I prefer the first order is I find it more readable when a complicated expression is substituted for x. Compare (= 2 (wibble (wobble (flob)))) with (= (wibble (wobble (flob))) 2) or (= (wibble (wobble (flob))) 2) It is more readable to present the simplest expression first, and the simplest expression is usually the one we compare against.) Well, commit [5c7c7193ca] should set things right. Vegard _________________________________________________________________ Få nye Windows Live™ Messenger. http://download.live.com/messenger