On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 1:18 PM, York Zhao <[email protected]> wrote:
The 'g;' and 'g,' command do not cycle through recent changes.
In the interest of keeping everyone's respective mail folders from flooding, is it possible for you to create a simple laundry list of things that are potentially broken so that the list's participants can evade having to find a way to merge discussion at a later juncture if changes are somehow related? The operation of forking the discussion off when required is quite trivial as most modern MUAs handle threading in a same manner, even if it isn't as DWIM-ish as people would expect. :) Furthermore, I foresee quite a bit of "getting lost in the workflow" happening here, so this might be a good time for some sort of legitimate defect tracking solution to be put in place. With kind regards, -- Nathaniel R. Reindl Connoisseur of Minimal Surfaces Purveyor of Simplicial Sensor Networks Religious Follower of Discrete Wavelet Transforms "Demoscene me beautiful. Bring back for me only the old times."