Dear Sanne, dear all, thank you for your comments. I agree with Sanne that the manuscript needs more focus and fewer words. The focus Sanne suggested corresponds with the aim of the workshop 1) what methods are used to determine and/or map carbon fuel emissions, 2) what are the method uncertainties. "Without giving too much details. By that I can get a quick overview" could make this paper different from other papers. I will work on the paper structure and streamline it. However, all of you have greater expertise in the field of fossil fuels than I do. So I encourage you to go over "your" sections before I mangle them ; )
The section "Assessment and improvement of emissions data products by in-situ measurements" contains parts of both Felix and my presentations/abstracts. It partly overlaps. In my point of view this section should contain a general introduction about using 14C, CO, radon and other GHG's measurements to quantify fossil fuel CO2 emissions and its uncertainties, with some references to relevant papers. The part with the Dutch case is too much in detail and can be skipped (the detailed part). Felix and Martin, I think it would be very good to re-arrange and shorten this current section. Do you agree with that? Shall I make a new version of this section?
Yes, Sanne, please do it. If possible use Google docs so we can all work on the latest version. Cheers, Martin