[Solar-general] Fwd: [lsb-discuss] lsb-discuss Digest, Vol 120, Issue 1

Mie Nov 2 15:28:15 CET 2016

puf

a quien se le ocurre poner /dev en otro lado?

no sabrias donde mandar lo q no te interesa :P

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Alan Cox <alan en lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 1:35 PM
Subject: Re: [lsb-discuss] lsb-discuss Digest, Vol 120, Issue 1
To: Brian Mayer <blmayer en icloud.com>
Cc: lsb-discuss en lists.linux-foundation.org

On Tue, 01 Nov 2016 13:23:21 -0200
Brian Mayer <blmayer en icloud.com> wrote:

> I'm proposing a standard way to define important directories by means of
variables, so, instead of having
> echo > /dev/null 2>&1 ;
> we would have
> echo > $DEVDIR/null 2>&1 ;
> This way we don't get errors of file not found. And it will work in any
machine, I mean, machines with non standard file hierarchy.

The /dev directory is laid down by the FSSTND, by Unix tradition and is
also part of earlier standards too - so if you don't have /dev in the
right place you aren't LSB compliant.

Alan
_______________________________________________
lsb-discuss mailing list
lsb-discuss en lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lsb-discuss

-- 
Gerardo Díaz
email: gerardo.diaz en gmail.com
blog: http://QueHacemosConLasPilas.WordPress.com
------------ próxima parte ------------
Se ha borrado un adjunto en formato HTML...
URL: <https://lists.ourproject.org/pipermail/solar-general/attachments/20161102/a7ad2103/attachment.html>