<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div></div><div>Thank you Rajani, and Michel for this introduction to Dr Amit Goswami. Very interesting.</div><div><br></div><div>Anna</div><div><br>On 17 Mar 2018, at 09:33, Michel Bauwens <<a href="mailto:michelsub2004@gmail.com">michelsub2004@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_quote">---------- Forwarded message ----------<br>From: <b class="gmail_sendername">r kanth</b> <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:involutegandhian@gmail.com">involutegandhian@gmail.com</a>></span><br>Date: Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 2:13 AM<br>Subject: Fwd: FROM RAJANI: INTERVIEW WITH DR. AMIT GOSWAMI, QUANTUM PHYSICIST<br>To: Michel Bauwens <<a href="mailto:michelsub2004@gmail.com">michelsub2004@gmail.com</a>><br><br><br><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr"><div><div class="m_-5705504144163536795m_8212616589586383740gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div style="font-size:12.8px"><div dir="ltr" style="font-size:12.8px"><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Garamond,serif;color:black"><b><i>This is the 2nd in a proposed Series of Interviews exploring New Ideas that may, perhaps,  serve as salves for our troubled times.</i></b></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Garamond,serif;color:black"><b><i>The queries are mine, the responses Amit's.</i></b></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt"><b style="font-size:12pt;color:black;font-family:Garamond,serif">Rajani</b><br></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Garamond,serif;color:black"><b><br></b></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Garamond,serif;color:black"><b><br></b></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Garamond,serif;color:black"><b>                            </b></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><b><span style="font-family:Garamond,serif;color:black"><br></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><b><span style="font-family:Garamond,serif;color:black">                                             IDEAS FOR OUR TIMES<span>  </span>(II)<span></span></span></b></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><b><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span></span></b></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><b><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span>                              <wbr>              </span><span>  </span></span></b><b><span style="font-family:"Brush Script MT";color:black">INTERVIEW: </span></b><b><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:"Brush Script MT";color:black"><span> </span></span></b><b><span style="font-size:18pt;font-family:"Brush Script MT";color:black">Dr . Amit
Goswami</span></b><b><span style="font-family:"Brush Script MT";color:black"><span></span></span></b></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><b><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span>                              <wbr>              </span><span></span></span></b></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><b><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span>                          </span></span></b><b><span style="font-family:Garamond,serif;color:black">THEMES:<span>  </span><i>Quantum
Physics, <span> </span>Consciousness,<span>  </span>and the Human <span></span></i></span></b></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt 1.5in;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><b><i><span style="font-family:Garamond,serif;color:black"><span>        </span>Condition</span></i></b><b><span style="font-family:Garamond,serif;color:black"><span></span></span></b></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span>                              <wbr>              </span><span>      </span></span><span style="font-family:"Bradley Hand ITC";color:black">[<b><i>Queried<span>  </span>by<span> 
</span>Professor Rajani<span>  </span>Kanth]</i></b><span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">1. <b><i>Explain what you mean by<span>  </span>your Key<span> 
</span>Phrase: "Consciousness is the Ground of Being".</i><span></span></b></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">Quantum physics indicates that material being
arises from <i>possibilities</i>, possibilities of consciousness.<span>  </span><span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">Consciousness is the ground of all being is a
generalization.<span>  </span><span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">All manifest being—sensing, thinking, feeling, intuition—arises
from consciousness.<span></span></span></i></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><b><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span></span></b></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><b><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">2. <i>How does that differ from
any Other extant<span>  </span>view of Consciousness ,
or Being?<span></span></i></span></b></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">The idea of a “ground” different from<span>  </span>space and time is experimentally verified in
quantum physics defined by instantaneous signal-less communication or
nonlocality (space and time is local; communication requires signals taking
time).<span>  </span><span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">Nonlocality translates as <i>unity</i>—<i>oneness of everything</i>
for this domain of potentiality or consciousness.<span>  </span><span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">Except for the wisdom traditions, nobody talks
about consciousness this way.<span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><b><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span></span></i></b></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><b><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">3. How did you chance upon that<span>  </span>novel idea?<span></span></span></i></b></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span></span></i></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">While I was having a heated argument with a
mystic friend.<span>  </span><span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">In retrospect, the idea was the culmination of a
creative process that extended over about ten years.<span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span></span></i></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><b><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">4. You reject Scientific Materialism: why?<span>  </span><span></span></span></i></b></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">Nonlocality, an experimental fact, simply rules it out. <span></span></span></i></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">We have “transferred potential experiments
(replicated in many laboratories all over the world) which show that electrical
potential can be transferred from one brain to another provided the two
subjects are able to hold the meditative intention that they will have direct
communication.<span>  </span><span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">Even neuroscience experiments are now supporting
the new view of consciousness and how it manifests in the brain as a self. <span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">Besides, there are so many experiential reasons.<span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><b><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">5.<span>  </span><i>Does Q. Physics really displace<span> 
</span>classical<span>  </span>(Newtonian)
physics?.<span>  </span>Where, and why?<span>  </span><span></span></i></span></b></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span></span></i></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">Yes, quantum physics really does replace Newtonian physics for all
matter, micro and macro</span></i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">.<span>  </span><span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">However, for the macroworld, Newtonian
predictions approximately hold; in this way materialists can argue if quantum
physics has enough effect in a macro-object like a brain for consciousness to
be relevant.<span>  </span><span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">I have shown that living matter is quantum
because it is nonlocally correlated with what is called <i>subtle
bodies</i>—potentialities that give rise to our subtle experiences of feeling and
thinking.<span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><b><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">6.<span>  </span>Is it
true the old Physics was deterministic whereas the new Physics is
probabilistic? Does that matter? Why?<span></span></span></i></b></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span></span></i></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">Yes, it is true.<span>  </span><span></span></span></i></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><i>Quantum objects are waves of possibility.<span>  </span></i><span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">It matters when we realize that these waves
reside not in space and time defined by locality but in another domain outside
space and time defined by nonlocality and oneness.<span>  </span><span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">This oneness is consciousness.<span></span></span></i></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><b><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">7<i>.The social sciences have
always suffered from 'physics envy': are they justified?<span></span></i></span></b></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">I don’t know!<span>  </span><span></span></span></i></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">I guess the physics envy comes from the fact
that physics is mathematical; but in all their efforts nobody has been
successful in developing a mathematic macroeconomics that work.<span>  </span><span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">In the new paradigm, social science no longer is
constrained to be deterministic.<span>  </span>Freedom
is back!<span>  </span><span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">They can relax.<span> 
</span><span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">Mathematics does not apply to social sciences.<span></span></span></i></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><b><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span></span></b></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><b><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">8<i>. There is a lot of
'quirkiness' to Q. Physics, in the popular mind: pl. explain.<span></span></i></span></b></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span></span></i></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">There is no quirkiness to quantum physics.<span>  </span><span></span></span></i></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">All the quirkiness is in the mind of scientific
materialists.<span>  </span><span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">If you have the wrong lens, reality looks muddles up, paradoxical.<span></span></span></i></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span></span></i></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><b><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">9. You have produced works that extend the
Quantum notion to Economics, Biology, et. al.<span> 
</span>Is that valid</span></i></b><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">?<span></span></span></i></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">Those are natural extension to make these
sciences apply to conscious beings like humans who have freedom, who have
nonmaterial experiences, even experiences of a self separate from the
world.<span>  </span><span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">Right now, <span> </span>what we call
biology or economics only apply to machines.<span></span></span></i></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">We live in a topsy-turvy world in which
biologists fight phantom creationists rather than recognize that neo-Darwinism
does not explain fossil gaps or the purposiveness of evolution revealed in
fossils data evolving from simple to complex.<span> 
</span><span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">I wrote a book Creative evolution which explain
all the data on evolution.<span>  </span><span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">Materialists hold on to the notion that quantum
physics is for the micro reality; it does not apply to the macro.<span>  </span><span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">But life, a biological organ, is coupled to
“subtle bodies” – subtle movements that we feel or think.<span>  </span><span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">It is these subtle movements that are quantum;
the physical organ becomes quantum by virtue of nonlocal correlation with the
subtle.<span>  </span><span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">It is all explained in the book quoted
above.<span>   </span><span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><b><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">10. You were featured<span>  </span>in a film called 'What the Bleep Do We
Know?":<span>  </span>your critics felt that you
turned science into<span>  </span>vulgar populism
(activism) thereafter? How do you react?<span></span></span></i></b></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span></span></i></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">Amusement</span></i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">, as I look at Trump
today.<span>  </span><span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">Scientific materialists created the idea of
“fake news.” <span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span>Just as
we have to turn back Trumpism with political activism, so also with quantum
activism we turn back scientific materialism.<span> 
</span><span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">It is slow, but we are gaining traction.<span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><b><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">11.<span>  </span><i>You argue that so-called<span> 
</span>'Non-Locality' proves the existence of another domain beyond space-time?
Pl. explain.</i><span></span></span></b></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">I already explained it above, see answer to Q2. <span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">Nonlocality—<i>signal-less
communication</i>--confirms that quantum potentiality resides in a definably
different domain of reality, different from space and time where locality
reigns. <span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span><span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><b><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">11.<span>  </span>But
there is no meaningful communication at all in the 'non-locality'<span>  </span>experiments<span> 
</span>that you cite. So why is it important?<span></span></span></i></b></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">This is pure misunderstanding.<span> 
</span><span></span></span></i></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">Somebody proved a theorem that information
cannot be transferred via nonlocality; but the theorem is valid if interactions
are all material.<span>  </span><span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">When consciousness and conscious choice enters
the picture, the theorem is no longer valid.<span> 
</span><span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span></span></i></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><b><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">12. Does that also<span>  </span>imply that Telepathy, ESP, etc.,<span>  </span>are all valid?<span></span></span></i></b></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span></span></i></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">It sure does,</span></i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"> as I have argued in my
book <i>God is not Dead.</i><span>  </span><span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">These ideas are experientially verified by
millions of people every day; even many scientists tacitly accept their
existence.<span>  </span><span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">But the official position of American physical
society does not change.<span>  </span><span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">How dogmatic is that?<span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><b><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">13. You suggest Jesus, Buddha, et. al,<span>  </span>were all on the right track: what do you
mean? Does God exist?<span></span></span></i></b></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span></span></i></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">Careful about that word God! <span></span></span></i></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">For most Christians, God is a super-duper human
being sitting on a throne in heaven doling out rewards and punishments, don’t
forget; this is not a scientific picture and materialists are justified
fighting it.<span>  </span><span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">God of quantum science, if you insist on using
the word and as I have used that word in my book quoted above, is <i>unity consciousness.</i><span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><b><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span></span></i></b></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><b><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">14. But are Science and Religion compatible, in
your Quantum<span>  </span>frame?<span></span></span></i></b></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span></span></i></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">Quantum science is compatible with religion in
its esoteric core (where unity consciousness is recognized as the ground of
being) but not with exoteric religions of popular understanding where unity
consciousness is caricatured by so-called monotheistic concepts of God
etc.<span>  </span><span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">This is a huge problem.<span>  </span><span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">Do we throw the baby out because of the dirty
bathwater?<span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><b><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span></span></i></b></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><b><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">15. Pl. explain the particle/wave distinction:
why do you think that matter exists in a domain of possibilities prior to<span>  </span>the 'wave-function' 'collapsing', via
sentient observation</span></i></b><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">.<span></span></span></i></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">Particles can exist only at one place at a time;
waves can be in many different places at the same time.<span>  </span><span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">Obviously they cannot co-exist in the same
domain of reality.<span>  </span><span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">There is no wave-particle duality in quantum physics except in the
materialists’ mind.</span></i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span>  </span>Quantum math clearly says quantum objects are
waves.<span>  </span><span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">To connect quantum math with experiment, we have
to invoke measurement which converts waves into particle.<span>  </span><span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">And measurement cannot be defined without
sentient observer.<span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">Scientific materialists refuse to understand
what John von Neumann and later I clarified long ago.<span>  </span><span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">Quantum measurement is about how the unity
(consciousness) splits into two: subject (observer) and object.<span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">To understand quantum physics, you have to understand and include
the subject in your philosophy</span></i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">.<span>  </span><span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">Materialists can’t, they are stuck with only
objects.<span>  </span><span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">When you have only a “hammer” in your hand, you
go on insisting that the word is “nails.”<span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><b><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">16. If the Observer is so important, then is it
an Anthropic universe? What about the distinction between observer/observed so
important to scientific<span>  </span>realism?<span></span></span></i></b></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">It is an anthropic universe, and why do people
prefer a machine universe?<span>  </span><span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">There is also that well-argued anthropic
principle.<span>  </span><span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">Scientific realism cannot stand the idea of
observer.<span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><b><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span></span></b></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><b><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">17. What do you mean by a 'Self-Aware' universe,
the title of your major work?<span></span></span></i></b></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span></span></i></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">That the universe is self-aware through us,
manifest through us; only we living beings experience the universe which exists
only in our ongoing experiences.<span>  </span><span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">We are here because of the universe, no doubt; <i>but the universe is here because of us.</i><span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><b><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span></span></b></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><b><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">18. Who agrees with you in the Scientific<span>  </span>Community?<span></span></span></i></b></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span></span></i></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">Among big name physicists, there are only a few
such as Henry Stapp and Casey Blood, maybe Fred Alan Wolf, too.<span>  </span><span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">But I have huge following in the healing
community, both physical healers including mainstream doctors, and
psychologists.<span>  </span><span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">I was deeply touched when the famous
psychiatrist and consciousness researcher Stan Grof, at a conference in Prague,
openly acknowledged my work and quantum science having given the scientific
basis for transpersonal psychology, a brain child of his and others.<span>  </span><span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">I think only the descendants of what you call Euromodernism are
the major hold-outs. <span></span></span></i></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span>  </span><b><i><span></span></i></b></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><b><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">19. How does<span> 
</span>traditional Darwinian Evolution fit in with your Quantum views?<span></span></span></i></b></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">Like a sore thumb.<span>  </span><span></span></span></i></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">I have already referred to my book called <i>Creative Evolution</i> above correcting the
shortcomings of Darwinism with a consciousness view of evolution.<span>  </span><span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">Darwinism is like Newtonian physics in the new
biology; it holds for evolution within a species or small changes of
microevolution.<span>  </span><span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">To understand macroevolution, you got to bring in quantum leaps.<span></span></span></i></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><b><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span></span></i></b></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><b><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">20. Is there a Crisis in Physics with
Newtonians, Einsteinians,<span>   </span>and<span>  </span>Q. Physicists, all disagreeing about
fundamentals?<span></span></span></i></b></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span></span></i></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">Yeah, the antagonists all disagree that subjects
exist, that living beings exist, beyond what their little lens allows them to
see.<span>  </span><span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">Oh, where is Paul Dirac now who said, In order to see a great new
truth, you have to give up a great old prejudice</span></i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">.<span>  </span><span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">Scientific materialists have to give up
materialism; it is not compatible with experiments.<span>  </span>There is a domain of nonlocality; there also
are nonmaterial “stuff,” both ideas verified by experimental data.<span>  </span><span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">Let us be scientific, folks.<span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span><span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><b><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">21. You have also stepped - trespassed? - into
the domain of healing. What is Quantum Healing?<span></span></span></i></b></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span></span></i></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">Quantum healing consists of quantum leaps of
healing, producing a discontinuous leap from disease to wellness.<span>  </span><span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">I have shown that the creative process can lead
to quantum healing and that idea, too, is being verified as large number of
people are using it to get healed.<span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><b><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">22. You<span> 
</span>suggest that ancient Indian and Chinese philosophy (yoga, chi,<span>  </span>chakras, ayurveda , etc<span>  </span>) have useful insights to offer us: what do
you mean?<span></span></span></i></b></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">They do</span></i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">, but you have to accept
the idea of nonphysical subtle objects to see the cogency of these philosophies
and practices.<span>  </span><span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">Yog, Ayurveda, TCM, are all about movements of <i>vital energy,</i> a nonphysical energy
connected with purposive functions of life.<span> 
</span><span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">It is possible to <i>measure</i> these energies now;
that should end the debate.<span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><b><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span></span></b></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><b><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">23. Do you still see yourself as a<span>  </span>normal scientist, carrying on scientific
research?<span></span></span></i></b></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span></span></i></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">Yes, of course.<span>  </span><span></span></span></i></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">I am a normal scientist without abnormal lens on
the eyes.<span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><b><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span></span></b></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><b><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">24. Is there any scientific caution you adopt
toward your own notion of 'consciousness is the ground of being': is it,
e.g.,<span>  </span>disprovable? How?<span></span></span></i></b></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span></span></i></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt"><font color="#000000" face="Calibri, sans-serif"><i>Of course.</i></font></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">Recent neuroscience studies of people who delve
into loving kindness creative and meditative practices for a long time are
showing nonlocality in the brain that signifies that these people “live” in
nonlocal consciousness.<span>  </span><span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">All materialists need to do is to find
explanation of these data without resorting to nonlocality to “disprove” the
idea of nonlocal consciousness.<span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><b><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span></span></b></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><b><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">25. <i>What do you think of
Transhumanism? Does it use<span>  </span>any Q.
insights?<span></span></i></span></b></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">It would be better for it if it did.<span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><b><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span></span></i></b></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><b><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">25. Is there a website you can direct<span>  </span>the curious to ?<span></span></span></i></b></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><b><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span></span></i></b></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">Yes, thanks.<span> 
</span><i><a href="http://amitgoswami.org" target="_blank">amitgoswami.org</a></i><span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><b><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span></span></i></b></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><b><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">26. Name your most important works</span></i></b><b><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">.<span></span></span></b></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">The Self-Aware Universe; Physics of the Soul; The Quantum Doctor;
Creative Evolution; How Quantum Activism can Save Civilization; Quantum
Creativity; Quantum economics;</span></i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"> and the upcoming <i>The Quantum science of Happiness</i>.<span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><b><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span></span></i></b></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><b><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span></span></i></b></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><b><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">25. What is the biggest danger facing humankind
today, in your opinion?<span></span></span></i></b></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">I am not oblivious of the perils of global
climate change, terrorism, Trumpism, failed economics, and all that. <span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">It may sound far-fetched, but please note that scientific
materialism contributed to all of these potential disasters</span></i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">.<span>  </span><span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">Also, please note that adapting a quantum
worldview in our society will go a long way toward correcting the trend.<span>  </span><i><span></span></i></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">My book How Quantum Activism can save Civilization </span></i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">gives all the details.<span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><b><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span></span></i></b></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><b><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">24. What is the future of your own<span>  </span>interpretation of Q. Physics?<span></span></span></i></b></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span></span></i></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">It is experimentally verified. <span></span></span></i></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">Transferred potential from brain to brain,
nonlocal self modality in the brain, those are replicated data.<span>  </span><span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><i><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">Experimentally verified scientific ideas are forever. <span></span></span></i></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><b><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black">[©R.Kanth, 2018]<span>   </span><span></span></span></b></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Cambria,serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black"><span> </span></span></p>





<br></div></div><div style="font-size:12.8px;margin:2px 0px 0px"><div><img src="https://ssl.gstatic.com/ui/v1/icons/mail/images/cleardot.gif"></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>
</div>
</div><br></div>
</div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature">P2P Foundation: <a href="http://p2pfoundation.net" target="_blank">http://p2pfoundation.net</a>  - <a href="http://blog.p2pfoundation.net" target="_blank">http://blog.p2pfoundation.net</a> <br><br>Connect: <a href="http://p2pfoundation.ning.com" target="_blank">http://p2pfoundation.ning.com</a>; Discuss: <a href="http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation" target="_blank">http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation</a><br><br>Updates: <a href="http://del.icio.us/mbauwens" target="_blank">http://del.icio.us/mbauwens</a>; <a href="http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens" target="_blank">http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens</a>; <a href="http://twitter.com/mbauwens" target="_blank">http://twitter.com/mbauwens</a>; <a href="http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens" target="_blank">http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens</a><br><br><br><br><br></div>
</div>
</div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>P2P Foundation - Mailing list</span><br><span></span><br><span>Blog - <a href="http://www.blog.p2pfoundation.net">http://www.blog.p2pfoundation.net</a></span><br><span>Wiki - <a href="http://www.p2pfoundation.net">http://www.p2pfoundation.net</a></span><br><span></span><br><span>Show some love and help us maintain and update our knowledge commons by making a donation. Thank you for your support.</span><br><span><a href="https://blog.p2pfoundation.net/donation">https://blog.p2pfoundation.net/donation</a></span><br><span></span><br><span><a href="https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation">https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation</a></span><br></div></blockquote></body></html>