<div dir="ltr">Dear Kevin,<div><br></div><div>the times when guilds and commons associations in the countryside provided these solidarity mechanisms, were highly unequal periods; and a patchwork of independent guilds would quickly lead to highly unequal outcomes (the monopoly game) ; this is why we need democratic polities to insure overall equality;</div><div><br></div><div>as far as I understand the evolution of the guilds, they started differentiatiing, merchant guilds became the strongest, and families detached themselves from the guilds to become early capitalists</div><div><br></div><div>I think the difference between us is whether a society exists separately as a field seperately from private agreements between autonomous players : I think it does and so we need a democratic polity to address common 'territorial' and other issues. </div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 3:57 AM, Kevin Carson <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:free.market.anticapitalist@gmail.com" target="_blank">free.market.anticapitalist@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I think there will likely be analogues of the Basic Income even in a<br>
non-state framework, provided by post-capitalist equivalents of<br>
medieval guilds, commons rights in open field villages, and the like.<br>
As states and corporations become fiscally exhausted and retreat from<br>
the social field, and both state- and employer-based safety nets<br>
erode, people will fill the void by creating a wide variety of primary<br>
social units on a multi-family scale for pooling income, costs and<br>
risks -- much like the self-sufficient units that emerged during the<br>
collapse of the Western Roman Empire. Micro-villages, extended family<br>
compounds, neighborhood associations and co-housing arrangements,<br>
urban communes.... A growing share of people will be born into such<br>
primary social units as the new norm, with an automatic right to an<br>
aliquot share of arable land and/or access to machines in the<br>
community shop, and some minimum (probably quite modest by our<br>
standards) required number of hours producing for common consumption<br>
in return for guaranteed sustenance to children, the aged and those<br>
unable to work.<br>
<br>
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 5:08 PM, Michel Bauwens<br>
<<a href="mailto:michel@p2pfoundation.net">michel@p2pfoundation.net</a>> wrote:<br>
> except you cannot ever institute a basic unconditional income outside of the<br>
> collective institution that is the state .. so there is a choice to be made,<br>
> where do you put your energy ... achieving the basic income would require<br>
> significant social mobilization and energy.<br>
><br>
> continuing to work on the commons economy on the other hand, is something we<br>
> can, and even must do, in the context of increasing market and state<br>
> failure,<br>
><br>
> Michel<br>
><br>
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Anna Harris <<a href="mailto:anna@shsh.co.uk">anna@shsh.co.uk</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> All of these proposals are not intrinsically opposed to each other. They<br>
>> can all run, indeed should run alongside each other. These are all possible<br>
>> solutions. Why waste time arguing which one is better? Being creative means<br>
>> using all of them at different times, in different circumstances. History<br>
>> cannot prove to us that what failed before will not at some future date be<br>
>> successful. We may see trends now, but we cannot predict with certainty that<br>
>> these will become strong enough to replace the current capital system, or<br>
>> that elites will give up their power without violent resistance.<br>
>><br>
>> Anna<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> On 17 Jun 2016, at 02:25, Michel Bauwens <<a href="mailto:michel@p2pfoundation.net">michel@p2pfoundation.net</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> I agree Ellen that this is also a very important third aspect, but also<br>
>> requires major political and social power to achieve it. The present land<br>
>> and water commons are declining rather than becoming stronger.<br>
>><br>
>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 9:51 PM, Ellen Friedman <<a href="mailto:ellen@ellenfriedman.com">ellen@ellenfriedman.com</a>><br>
>> wrote:<br>
>>><br>
>>> I think Jakob speaks to something I noticed after reading Michel’s<br>
>>> original piece that began this discussion. Michel wrote, "Overcoming the<br>
<span class="">>>> capitalist form of the market, means interfering in capital accumulation.<br>
</span>>>> This can and must be done in two ways.”<br>
>>><br>
>>> There’s a third way that’s essential to interfering with capital<br>
>>> accumulation. This third way is to liberate the land, waters and all life.<br>
>>> The life blood of capitalism is the living planet. Privatization of the<br>
>>> land, water and all life must end. Land and water must be liberated from the<br>
>>> social construct of property. Life should never be property.<br>
>>><br>
>>> One way I see this happening is by creating a polycentric system of<br>
>>> planetary commons trusts formed around ecosystems so they can be stewarded<br>
>>> both locally and globally. In order to right the wrong of dispossession and<br>
>>> create reparations, local stewardship could be led by indigenous peoples.<br>
>>> Once the living planet is in a trust, corporations and governments should be<br>
>>> charged rent for using the land, water, minerals and more. This would end<br>
>>> externalization of costs. The trusts could set limits on what is taken in<br>
>>> order to restore the planet to health and steward the living land and waters<br>
>>> in perpetuity. Funds raised in this way could provide the means for<br>
>>> planetary restoration and a basic income for humans.<br>
>>><br>
>>> There’s a movement to create a fifth missing international crime against<br>
>>> peace- ecocide. Corporations who have committed ecocide should be<br>
>>> prosecuted, their assets seized and their charters revoked. Seized assets<br>
>>> could be used to remediate the harm and provide additional operational funds<br>
>>> for the trusts. For example, BP’s assets could be used to create a trust for<br>
>>> the Gulf of Mexico and the people of the area. Exxon’s assets could be used<br>
>>> to combat climate change and provide funds for resettling refugees.<br>
>>><br>
>>> Ellen<br>
>>> Austin, Tx.<br>
>>><br>
>>> On Jun 16, 2016, at 6:03 AM, Jakob Rigi <<a href="mailto:Rigij@ceu.edu">Rigij@ceu.edu</a>> wrote:<br>
>>><br>
>>> Michel,<br>
>>><br>
>>> You simply avoid to answer my questions. Capitalism emerged by<br>
>>> dispossessing immediate producers from their means of productions and<br>
>>> transforming these producers into waged labourers. Capitalism reproduces<br>
>>> itself by paying wages that are enough for the reproduction of labour power.<br>
>>> Thus the worker remain dispossessed. Land and nature as the main source of<br>
>>> life are private property of capitalists. No one will ever be able to build<br>
>>> a new collective mode of production without collectivising first land and<br>
>>> other means of production and this requires expropriating capitalists: a<br>
>>> social revolution. You avoid to answer the questions by the rhetoric that<br>
>>> the Marxist strategy has failed. If by the Marxist strategy you mean the<br>
>>> Soviet case, it had some achievements but failed. But, that failure does<br>
>>> not imply that the historical project of expropriating capitalist has<br>
>>> failed. The industrial capitalism first emerged in Italian city states but<br>
>>> was aborted there. Later, in more mature condition it took not only root in<br>
>>> Britain but become globalised. Generalising the soviet experiment in<br>
>>> rhetorical way as you do into a law is very mechanistic and deterministic.<br>
>>> The failure of the Soviet experiment is by no means prove that a new effort<br>
>>> in our time for expropriating the expropriators will also fail. We need to<br>
>>> judged the success and failure of the Soviet case in its historical<br>
>>> conditions.<br>
>>> Jakob<br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>> ________________________________<br>
>>> From: <a href="mailto:michelsub2004@gmail.com">michelsub2004@gmail.com</a> <<a href="mailto:michelsub2004@gmail.com">michelsub2004@gmail.com</a>> on behalf of<br>
>>> Michel Bauwens <<a href="mailto:michel@p2pfoundation.net">michel@p2pfoundation.net</a>><br>
>>> Sent: 15 June 2016 17:25<br>
>>> To: Jakob Rigi<br>
>>> Cc: Orsan Senalp; Commoning; <a href="mailto:networkedlabour@lists.contrast.org">networkedlabour@lists.contrast.org</a>;<br>
<div><div class="h5">>>> p2p-foundation<br>
>>> Subject: Re: [NetworkedLabour] A note on the post-capitalist strategy of<br>
>>> the P2P Foundation<br>
>>><br>
>>> Jakob,<br>
>>><br>
>>> capitalism can only reproduce itself through commodity labor and workers<br>
>>> as consumers, this gives us powerful leverage.<br>
>>><br>
>>> if we don't have the power, nor a social consensus to 'expropriate', the<br>
>>> building of counter-hegemonic power is essential to get there ... merely<br>
>>> mobilizing counter-power within the capitalist system, i.e. dependent labor,<br>
>>> has not worked for 200 years, and I see few signs that it can. The diverse<br>
>>> forms of property that exist, and protected by the state, can be used by<br>
>>> commoners to mutualize capital and means of production. Obviously, powerful<br>
>>> social movements can set rules to limit monopolistic control of resources,<br>
>>> but then you still have to deal with the impotence of nations to do this,<br>
>>> and they most likely will smash you, as they are doing with greece and<br>
>>> venezuela and elsewhere. This brings to the fore the other aspect of our<br>
>>> strategy, which is to built counter-hegemonic power at the global level.<br>
>>> Just screaming "I hate capitalism and I will smash you" is not going to do<br>
>>> it.<br>
>>><br>
>>> The strategy we describe worked for capital and for all the previous<br>
>>> transitions (read Karatini), while the marxist strategy of taking power and<br>
>>> change everything once we have that power, has been a dismal failure. So I<br>
>>> think that continuing in that vein after 200 years of failure, that is the<br>
>>> wishful thinking. It hasn't worked for previous transitions, and isn't<br>
>>> working for this transition, so what is your evidence ? Our strategy is<br>
>>> based on the necessary prefigurative construction of counter-power, which is<br>
>>> how past transitions were successful<br>
>>><br>
>>> Michel<br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 8:56 PM, Jakob Rigi <<a href="mailto:RigiJ@ceu.edu">RigiJ@ceu.edu</a>> wrote:<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Mitchel<br>
>>>> The idea that commoners and cooperative worker can challenge capitalism<br>
>>>> by working for themselves and make the state their partner is a wishful<br>
>>>> fantasy- is not realisable.<br>
>>>> Capitalism is in the first place the private ownership in means of<br>
>>>> production. And the state is in the first place the power and institutions<br>
>>>> that protect the private property in means of production.<br>
>>>> No cooperative production can become the dominant mode of production<br>
>>>> unless land and other strategic means of productions have been transformed<br>
>>>> into commons.<br>
>>>> Do you agree with this statement? If not what are your counter argument?<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> If yes, then how land other strategic means of production can be<br>
>>>> transformed into commons?<br>
>>>> I argue that this require expropriating capitalists. If you disagree,<br>
>>>> what are your counter arguments?<br>
>>>> If you agree, then, making the production of commons the dominant mode<br>
>>>> of production requires confronting the sate not becoming its partner.<br>
>>>> Capitalist did not needed always to expropriate the feudal landowners since<br>
>>>> the latter started to lease their land to capitalists. But, capitalists<br>
>>>> expropriated small owners the means of production-the so called primitive<br>
>>>> accumulation. The emerging Feudal class did not expropriate the slave<br>
>>>> owners since salve owners themselves became feudals. But, capitalist having<br>
>>>> expropriated the majority of the population and thereby have monopolised the<br>
>>>> strategic means of production. Transferring these means of production to the<br>
>>>> majority, meaning making them universal commons of humanity requires<br>
>>>> expropriating capitalists. But, state would not allow us to do that. It will<br>
>>>> tell you that capitalist ownership is guaranteed by the law. And the law is<br>
>>>> the holiest of the holy. We-the state- will not permit anyone to break the<br>
>>>> law even if it will be necessary to shed blood. Our monopoly right our<br>
>>>> violence is here to protect capitalist property in means of production .<br>
>>>> So the commoners mus confront such a state and smash at least its<br>
>>>> coercive and violent institutions and expropriate the expropriators for the<br>
>>>> benefit of the humanity as whole and transform their property int universal<br>
>>>> commons.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Jakob<br>
>>>> Jakob<br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>> ________________________________<br>
>>>> From: NetworkedLabour <<a href="mailto:networkedlabour-bounces@lists.contrast.org">networkedlabour-bounces@lists.contrast.org</a>> on<br>
>>>> behalf of Orsan Senalp <<a href="mailto:orsan1234@gmail.com">orsan1234@gmail.com</a>><br>
>>>> Sent: 15 June 2016 10:47<br>
>>>> To: Jakob Rigi; Michel Bauwens<br>
>>>> Cc: Commoning; <a href="mailto:networkedlabour@lists.contrast.org">networkedlabour@lists.contrast.org</a>; p2p-foundation<br>
>>>> Subject: Re: [NetworkedLabour] A note on the post-capitalist strategy of<br>
>>>> the P2P Foundation<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> There are many overlapping aspect between Cox, and Van Der Pijl's<br>
>>>> 'transnational historical materialist' analysis and what you have put<br>
>>>> together Michel.So I share the vision, I only would add a direct-action,<br>
>>>> political confrontation axe which needs to be built based on what can be<br>
>>>> imagined as 'peer to peer social network unionism'. As supportive element in<br>
>>>> terms of organizing power, and broader alliance building, hence<br>
>>>> collectivization of working alternatives and to defend them against ruling<br>
>>>> class violence and use of force. Not to precede what you suggest or to<br>
>>>> replace it but simultaneously empower the counter hegemonic transnational<br>
>>>> trinity (of as in Cox Institutons-material capabilities-ideas /<br>
>>>> capital-state-nation).<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Orsan<br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>> On 15 Jun 2016, at 03:56, Michel Bauwens <<a href="mailto:michel@p2pfoundation.net">michel@p2pfoundation.net</a>><br>
>>>> wrote:<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> some of you may be interested in this short note:<br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Post-Capitalist Strategy of the P2P Foundation<br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Discussion[edit]<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Michel Bauwens:<br>
>>>> "A note on the post-capitalist strategy of the P2P Foundation<br>
>>>> Following Kojin Karatini, we agree that the present system is based on a<br>
>>>> trinity of capital-state-nation, which represents an integration of three<br>
>>>> modes of exchange. Capital represents a particular market form based on the<br>
>>>> endless accumulation of capital, the state is the entity that keeps the<br>
>>>> system together through coercion, law and redistribution (Karatini calls<br>
>>>> this function ‘rule and protect’), and the nation is the ‘imagined<br>
>>>> community’ that is the locus of the survival of community and reciprocity. A<br>
>>>> post-capitalist strategy must necessarily overcome all three in a new<br>
>>>> integration.<br>
>>>> Overcoming the capitalist form of the market, means interfering in<br>
>>>> capital accumulation. This can and must be done in two ways. First of all,<br>
>>>> the capitalist market requires labor as a commodity, and therefore,<br>
>>>> overcoming capitalism means refusing to work for capitalism as commodity<br>
>>>> labor. Hence the stress on open cooperativism, i.e. commoners work for<br>
>>>> themselves, in democratic associations and create autonomous livelihoods<br>
>>>> around our commons, protected from value capture through membranes such as<br>
>>>> reciprocity-based licenses. Measures like the basic income also<br>
>>>> substantially remove the compulsion for workers to have to sell their labor<br>
>>>> power, and would strengthen the capacity to create alternative economic<br>
>>>> entities. However, we must proceed with the reality that exists today, and<br>
>>>> create our own funding and resource allocation mechanisms. The second way is<br>
>>>> to withdraw from capitalism and capital accumulation is by removing our<br>
>>>> cooperation as consumers. Without workers as producers and workers as<br>
>>>> consumers, there can be no reproduction of capital. The latter means the<br>
>>>> invention and creation of new forms of consumption that are derived from the<br>
>>>> creation of open cooperatives. Workers mutualize their consumption in pooled<br>
>>>> market forms such as community-supported agriculture and the like. To the<br>
>>>> degree that we systematically organize new provisioning and consumption<br>
>>>> systems, outside of the sphere of capital, we undermine the reproduction of<br>
>>>> capital and capital accumulation. In addition, we create ‘transvestment’<br>
>>>> vehicles, which allow the acceptance of capital, as disciplined by the new<br>
>>>> commons and market forms that we develop through peer production, this<br>
>>>> creates a flow of value from the system of capital to the system of the<br>
>>>> commons economy. Faced with a crisis of capital accumulation, it is entirely<br>
>>>> realistic to expect a stream of value which seeks a place in the commons<br>
>>>> economy. Instead of the cooptation of the commons economy by capital, in the<br>
>>>> form of the netarchical capitalist platforms which capture value from the<br>
>>>> commons, we coopt capital inside the commons, and subject it to its rules.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> I believe we can achieve similar effects with the state. Our strategy<br>
>>>> for a ‘partner state’ is to ‘commonify’ the state. We strive to transform<br>
>>>> state functions so that they actually empower and enable the autonomy of the<br>
>>>> citizens as individuals and groups, to create common resources, instead of<br>
>>>> being ‘consumers’ of state services. We abolish the separation of the state<br>
>>>> from the population by increasing democratic and participatory<br>
>>>> decision-making. We consider the public service as a commons, giving every<br>
>>>> citizen and resident the right to work in the commonified public services.<br>
>>>> But we don’t ‘withdraw’ completely from the state because we need common<br>
>>>> good institutions for everyone in a given territory, which creates equal<br>
>>>> capacities for every citizen to contribute to the commons and the ethical<br>
>>>> market organizations.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> In another article we have argued that the capital-state-nation trinity<br>
>>>> is no longer able to balance global capitalism, because it has created a<br>
>>>> very powerful transnational financial class, which is able to move resources<br>
>>>> globally and discipline the state and the nations that dare rebalance it.<br>
>>>> Our answer is to create trans-local and trans-national civic and economic<br>
>>>> entities that can eventually rebalance and counter the power of the<br>
>>>> transnational capitalist class. This is realistic because peer production<br>
>>>> technologies create global open design communities that mutualize knowledge<br>
>>>> on a global scale, and because we can create global and ethical market<br>
>>>> organizations around them. Even as we produce locally, we organize<br>
>>>> trans-local productive communities. These trans-local productive communities<br>
>>>> are no longer bound by the nation-state and project and require forms of<br>
>>>> governance that can operate on the global scale. In this way, they also<br>
>>>> transcend the power of the nation-state. As we explained in our strategy<br>
>>>> regarding the global capitalist market, these forces can operate against the<br>
>>>> accumulation of capital at the global level, and create global<br>
>>>> counter-hegemonic power. In all likelihood, this will create global<br>
>>>> governance mechanisms and institutions that are no longer inter-national,<br>
>>>> but trans-national, but are not transnational capitalism.<br>
>>>> In conclusion, our aim is to replace the capital-state-nation trinity,<br>
>>>> which is no longer functioning, and to avoid global domination of private<br>
>>>> capital, by creating a new integrative trinity, Commons-Ethical Market-<br>
>>>> Partner State, that is not confined to the nation-state level, but can<br>
>>>> operate trans-nationally and transcend the older and dysfunctional trinity.<br>
>>>> Through these processes, citizens develop cosmopolitan subjectivities but<br>
>>>> also allegiance to local and trans-national commons-oriented communities of<br>
>>>> value creation and value distribution."<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> --<br>
>>>> Check out the Commons Transition Plan here at:<br>
>>>> <a href="http://commonstransition.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://commonstransition.org</a><br>
>>>><br>
</div></div><span class="">>>>> P2P Foundation: <a href="http://p2pfoundation.net" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://p2pfoundation.net</a> -<br>
>>>> <a href="http://blog.p2pfoundation.net" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://blog.p2pfoundation.net</a><br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Updates: <a href="http://twitter.com/mbauwens" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://twitter.com/mbauwens</a>; <a href="http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens</a><br>
>>>><br>
>>>> #82 on the (En)Rich list: <a href="http://enrichlist.org/the-complete-list/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://enrichlist.org/the-complete-list/</a><br>
>>>><br>
>>>> _______________________________________________<br>
>>>> NetworkedLabour mailing list<br>
>>>> <a href="mailto:NetworkedLabour@lists.contrast.org">NetworkedLabour@lists.contrast.org</a><br>
>>>> <a href="http://lists.contrast.org/mailman/listinfo/networkedlabour" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.contrast.org/mailman/listinfo/networkedlabour</a><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>> --<br>
>>> Check out the Commons Transition Plan here at:<br>
>>> <a href="http://commonstransition.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://commonstransition.org</a><br>
>>><br>
>>> P2P Foundation: <a href="http://p2pfoundation.net" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://p2pfoundation.net</a> - <a href="http://blog.p2pfoundation.net" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://blog.p2pfoundation.net</a><br>
>>><br>
>>> Updates: <a href="http://twitter.com/mbauwens" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://twitter.com/mbauwens</a>; <a href="http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens</a><br>
>>><br>
>>> #82 on the (En)Rich list: <a href="http://enrichlist.org/the-complete-list/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://enrichlist.org/the-complete-list/</a><br>
>>> _______________________________________________<br>
</span>>>> Commoning mailing list<br>
>>> Commons-Institut e.V. Germany<br>
>>> <a href="mailto:Commoning@lists.commons-institut.org">Commoning@lists.commons-institut.org</a><br>
>>> <a href="https://lists.schokokeks.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/commoning" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.schokokeks.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/commoning</a><br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">>>><br>
>>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> --<br>
>> Check out the Commons Transition Plan here at:<br>
>> <a href="http://commonstransition.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://commonstransition.org</a><br>
>><br>
>> P2P Foundation: <a href="http://p2pfoundation.net" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://p2pfoundation.net</a> - <a href="http://blog.p2pfoundation.net" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://blog.p2pfoundation.net</a><br>
>><br>
>> Updates: <a href="http://twitter.com/mbauwens" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://twitter.com/mbauwens</a>; <a href="http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens</a><br>
>><br>
>> #82 on the (En)Rich list: <a href="http://enrichlist.org/the-complete-list/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://enrichlist.org/the-complete-list/</a><br>
>><br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> NetworkedLabour mailing list<br>
>> <a href="mailto:NetworkedLabour@lists.contrast.org">NetworkedLabour@lists.contrast.org</a><br>
>> <a href="http://lists.contrast.org/mailman/listinfo/networkedlabour" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.contrast.org/mailman/listinfo/networkedlabour</a><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> --<br>
> Check out the Commons Transition Plan here at: <a href="http://commonstransition.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://commonstransition.org</a><br>
><br>
> P2P Foundation: <a href="http://p2pfoundation.net" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://p2pfoundation.net</a> - <a href="http://blog.p2pfoundation.net" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://blog.p2pfoundation.net</a><br>
><br>
> Updates: <a href="http://twitter.com/mbauwens" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://twitter.com/mbauwens</a>; <a href="http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens</a><br>
><br>
> #82 on the (En)Rich list: <a href="http://enrichlist.org/the-complete-list/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://enrichlist.org/the-complete-list/</a><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> NetworkedLabour mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:NetworkedLabour@lists.contrast.org">NetworkedLabour@lists.contrast.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.contrast.org/mailman/listinfo/networkedlabour" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.contrast.org/mailman/listinfo/networkedlabour</a><br>
><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
--<br>
Kevin Carson<br>
Senior Fellow, Karl Hess Scholar in Social Theory<br>
Center for a Stateless Society <a href="http://c4ss.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://c4ss.org</a><br>
<br>
"You have no authority that we are bound to respect" -- John Perry Barlow<br>
"We are legion. We never forgive. We never forget. Expect us" -- Anonymous<br>
<br>
Homebrew Industrial Revolution: A Low-Overhead Manifesto<br>
<a href="http://homebrewindustrialrevolution.wordpress.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://homebrewindustrialrevolution.wordpress.com</a><br>
Desktop Regulatory State <a href="http://desktopregulatorystate.wordpress.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://desktopregulatorystate.wordpress.com</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
NetworkedLabour mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:NetworkedLabour@lists.contrast.org">NetworkedLabour@lists.contrast.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.contrast.org/mailman/listinfo/networkedlabour" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.contrast.org/mailman/listinfo/networkedlabour</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div>Check out the Commons Transition Plan here at: <a href="http://commonstransition.org" target="_blank">http://commonstransition.org</a> </div><div><br></div>P2P Foundation: <a href="http://p2pfoundation.net" target="_blank">http://p2pfoundation.net</a> - <a href="http://blog.p2pfoundation.net" target="_blank">http://blog.p2pfoundation.net</a> <br><br><a href="http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation" target="_blank"></a>Updates: <a href="http://twitter.com/mbauwens" target="_blank">http://twitter.com/mbauwens</a>; <a href="http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens" target="_blank">http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens</a><br><br>#82 on the (En)Rich list: <a href="http://enrichlist.org/the-complete-list/" target="_blank">http://enrichlist.org/the-complete-list/</a> <br></div></div></div></div>
</div>