<div dir="ltr"><<span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"> Today, you can in real time</span><br style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">collaborate with agency that would in the past seemed opponent to you</span><br style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">
<span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">politically; like Phorudon and Marx (anarchism vs communism), Lasal</span><br style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">and Spartakists as well as Lenin and Kautsky (Socialism vs. Social</span><br style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">
<span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">Democracy), as well as all the following generations of left and</span><br style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">progressive fracitonalism. This made possible for capitalism to assert</span><br style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">
<span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">itself as an irreversible and immortal historical structure.></span><div><font face="arial, sans-serif"><br></font></div><div><font face="arial, sans-serif">Dear Orsan,</font></div>
<div><font face="arial, sans-serif"><br></font></div><div><font face="arial, sans-serif">I'm not sure how to understand that argument. I would say yes, networks function by affinity and seek commonality for joint action, and much of the earlier antagonisms seem antiquated. I think it is also a epistemological and multi-perspectival or trans-paradigmic issue: do we have to agree with marx 100% and reject Proudhon or rather can we expect that there is truth in various positions ? Are all the debates and antagonisms of the 19th and 20th cy fully operational today ? But I'm not sure how this is related to 'made it possible for capitalism to assert itself" How is the fact that say anarchists and communists can now talk to each other and transcend former antagonisms, related to capital's self-assertion ?</font></div>
<div><font face="arial, sans-serif"><br></font></div><div><font face="arial, sans-serif">I fully agree with your last paragraph:</font></div><div><font face="arial, sans-serif"><br></font></div><div><font face="arial, sans-serif"><"</font><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"> </span><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">as long as we are doing trans-level and</span></div>
<span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">multi-dimentional practice of community/network building and</span><br style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">interlinking work (allowing empowerment of ourselves and all the nodes</span><br style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">
<span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">simultaneously), it does not matter that much what we have as personal</span><br style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">visions, preferences, expectations, predictions, so on.. about the</span><br style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">
<span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">future and nature of transition. The previous organisational forms,</span><br style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">like part, platform, block, front, did not allow such collaborative</span><br style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">
<span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">and egaliterian ethical alliances. Now it is more possible then</span><br style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">before, not perfectly smooth of course. With the 'quantum-logic' I was</span><br style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">
<span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">reffering this new possibility. This is an outcome of the</span><br style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">technological-communicational paradigm shift, and at the moment it</span><br style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">
<span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">works for the advantage of the ruled, yet it might not last long."></span><div><div><br></div>-- <br><div dir="ltr"><div><b>Please note an intrusion wiped out my inbox on February 8; I have no record of previous communication, proposals, etc ..</b></div>
<div><br></div>P2P Foundation: <a href="http://p2pfoundation.net" target="_blank">http://p2pfoundation.net</a> - <a href="http://blog.p2pfoundation.net" target="_blank">http://blog.p2pfoundation.net</a> <br><br><a href="http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation" target="_blank"></a>Updates: <a href="http://twitter.com/mbauwens" target="_blank">http://twitter.com/mbauwens</a>; <a href="http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens" target="_blank">http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens</a><br>
<br>#82 on the (En)Rich list: <a href="http://enrichlist.org/the-complete-list/" target="_blank">http://enrichlist.org/the-complete-list/</a> <br></div>
</div></div>