<div dir="ltr">You can post to Parliamentarians :<div><br></div><div><a href="http://savetheinternet.eu/">http://savetheinternet.eu/</a><br></div><div><div><br></div><div><a href="http://savetheinternet.eu/#act">http://savetheinternet.eu/#act</a></div>
</div><div><br></div><div><a href="https://www.laquadrature.net/en/eu-parliament-negotiations-on-net-neutrality-taking-a-disastrous-turn">https://www.laquadrature.net/en/eu-parliament-negotiations-on-net-neutrality-taking-a-disastrous-turn</a><br>
</div><div><br></div><div>especially the Italian and Greek MEP's who may be moving in a direction of limiting internet neutrality ?</div><div><br></div><div>Example of email sent ( feel free to copy, and repost, while signing with your own name at the end of the message )</div>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div class="gmail_quote">---------- Forwarded message ----------<br>From: <b class="gmail_sendername">Dante-Gabryell Monson</b> <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dante.monson@gmail.com">dante.monson@gmail.com</a>></span><br>
Date: Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 2:41 AM<br>Subject: Please save the Internet<br>To: <a href="mailto:dimitrios.droutsas@europarl.europa.eu">dimitrios.droutsas@europarl.europa.eu</a><br><br><br><div dir="ltr"><div>Dear Dimitrios Droutsas,</div>
<div><br></div><div>The decisions that you and your colleagues will make this week will have a lasting impact on the open internet in Europe. It’s critical to get this right and not accept bad compromises.</div>
<div><br></div><div>The Commission's current proposal on a "Telecoms Single Market” includes provisions undermining network neutrality by permitting pervasive networks discrimination, to the detriment of user rights and the single market.</div>
<div><br></div><div>As a first step, ITRE members must remove the current definition of "specialized services", closing a dangerous loophole that would create a two-tiered internet, strangling online innovation, competition, diversity, and the exercise of human rights on the internet.</div>
<div><br></div><div>I urge you to adopt the robust definition of “network neutrality” put forward by the CULT committee, one that ensures that internet providers do not block or discriminate against content, websites, applications, or services; that online innovation isn’t stifled; that anti-competitive practices don’t flourish. </div>
<div><br></div><div>Finally, while some progress in the ITRE Committee has been made, it is critical that members stand their ground and address the remaining problematic issues in the Rapporteur’s compromise amendments. A compromise that allows a few loopholes that destroy the open internet instead of many loopholes that would destroy the open internet is not an acceptable compromise. </div>
<div><br></div><div>Sincerely,</div><div><br></div></div>
</div><br></div>