<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 5:46 PM, flawer <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:flawer@shareful.be" target="_blank">flawer@shareful.be</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im">> 狢 would hope that granular and modulable metadata assembled<br>
> into contextualized descriptions,<br>
<br>
</div>i guess you refer to data explicit ontologies from resources types ()<br>
and from more abstract or meta things (i.e. human values, courage,<br>
lazyness, etc. i.e. blue, red, etc)<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>yes :)</div><div>describing objects with ontologies, or eventually with tags ( and enable a combination of a folksonomy and ontologies to describe objects and relations between them )</div>
<div>�</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
implicit data (i.e. logs in at same time on fridays, etc) would be even<br>
more interesting to network with.....<br>
<br>
for then stablishing preferences of investments or for simplier<br>
exchanging material things as a excuse for getting in a better human<br>
relation with certain peers (the machine recommends me to<br>
invest/exchange with x related maybe unknown peers)<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>yes, manual queries using the system, or algorithms for the system to automatically make suggestions</div><div>�</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
if instead of preferences we say: requirements (to deal *just* with<br>
"couragous blue" mates), we have a kind of currency.. </blockquote><div><br></div><div>yes</div><div>�</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
(flow network is<br>
perhaps more accurate :) and brings the overlap issue:<br>
<br>
<br>
> Somehow, I see a variety of [clauses] , amongst other ontologies<br>
<div class="im">> many seem to be taking for granted , of which perhaps certain could<br>
> overlap ?<br>
<br>
</div>sure. in (i.e. human values), you shouldn't flow/convert couragous<br>
points into coward points, or you shouldn't use a shareful coward thing<br>
if you don't have coward points... or you should be able to clear your<br>
coward points with courageous points? haha.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>:)</div><div><br></div><div>yes...</div><div><br></div><div>note :�</div><div>or perhaps even before any interpretation into "coward points" ( whatever the objective algorithm / interpretation of such points would be ) ,</div>
<div>the visualization of past transactions as a form of reputation ,</div><div>or of currently described contexts and suggestions, can speak for itself :)</div><div><br></div><div>I guess, very much like on e-bay or couchsurfing</div>
<div><br></div><div>�</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> i guess this depends on the<br>
owner of the ontology, the relations he allowed that concept to be<br>
transferable with.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>yes, ideally ontologies would be free to use... �</div><div>one would need to convene to use the same ontologies...</div><div>though perhaps some kind of combination with a folksonomical approach could bridge some of the stiffness of ontological meaning giving ?</div>
<div><br></div><div>Or natural language processing... but perhaps that becomes more complex, and I do not know much about it...</div><div>�</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
i imagine i am trying subscribing to "courage" and "courage2" flows in<br>
network x, which are incompatible between them.. owned by different<br>
authors).<br>
<br>
i have overseen some more specifications in this direction, but i am...<br>
aa..<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>:)</div><div>�</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="HOEnZb">
<div class="h5">
_______________________________________________<br>
P2P Foundation - Mailing list<br>
<a href="http://www.p2pfoundation.net" target="_blank">http://www.p2pfoundation.net</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation" target="_blank">https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>