thanks Sam,<br><br>if you ever see timelines on this, thanks for letting me and ben know,<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 9:07 PM, Samuel Rose <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:samuel.rose@gmail.com">samuel.rose@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">Michel, yes I thought 2030 was plausible. (stop reading this now if<br>
you are easily depressed). Now, I think we could see problems in even<br>
*less* time than that. We could see the West Antarctic Ice Sheet<br>
suddenly slide into the ocean, which would raise sea levels very<br>
quickly. Or, we could see as little as a decade long release of<br>
giga-tons of methane gas from the ocean floor. 55 million years ago,<br>
just such an event happened, according to paleoclimatologists, and it<br>
caused a temperature spike of 8 degrees celsius, killing 2/3 of ocean<br>
species. Ice ages also show evidence of rapid climate shift (even as<br>
little as 3 years).<br>
<br>
On top of that, we can see that we are now down to about 10% of world<br>
fisheries <a href="http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2003/05/0515_030515_fishdecline.html" target="_blank">http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2003/05/0515_030515_fishdecline.html</a><br>
,<br>
<br>
10% of rainforests. (next year we are projected to cross the threshold<br>
of 10% of rainforests and 50% of species that some believe rainforest<br>
ecologies can bounce back from on their own<br>
<a href="http://www.rainforests.net/variables.htm" target="_blank">http://www.rainforests.net/variables.htm</a> )<br>
<br>
And, we are using 1 and one half of the total capacity of the earth to<br>
replenish itself! We have *already* exceeded the limits of growth.<br>
<a href="http://www.footprintnetwork.org/en/index.php/GFN/page/world_footprint/" target="_blank">http://www.footprintnetwork.org/en/index.php/GFN/page/world_footprint/</a><br>
<br>
Plus, I think it is clear that on a worldwide bio-psyhco-social level,<br>
we are already seeing many areas slide into control paradigms (most<br>
remarkably right here in the West), while we're also seeing people<br>
coordinate to topple old control regimes, or broken bureaucracies.<br>
<br>
What this all means to me is that we are already in serious, serious<br>
trouble. Yet, as we discussed in work in Future Forward Institute, and<br>
as we've explored here in P2P Foundation for a number of years, there<br>
is also plenty that is emerging as adaptation to these changes<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 6:03 AM, Michel Bauwens<br>
<<a href="mailto:michel@p2pfoundation.net">michel@p2pfoundation.net</a>> wrote:<br>
> thanks for helping Ben, in cc, with this important question:<br>
><br>
> < first question: Is it possible, or do you know of resources and data I can<br>
> look at, to maintain the exponential growth the economic structures require?<br>
> Id appreciate any other reflections or ideas you have about how this<br>
> relatively short-term scenario could possibly play out. ><br>
><br>
> part of my own answer is below with recommended resources<br>
><br>
> Ben, see<br>
> <a href="http://blog.p2pfoundation.net/p2p-practices-as-condition-for-the-next-long-wave/2011/01/14" target="_blank">http://blog.p2pfoundation.net/p2p-practices-as-condition-for-the-next-long-wave/2011/01/14</a><br>
><br>
> In this paper, I draw on Kondratieff wave theory and Carlota Perez to<br>
> describe the near and longer future scenario,<br>
><br>
> basically:<br>
><br>
> Sudden system shock makes previous system inoperable<br>
><br>
> 15 years of crisis, deleveraging of debt, etc ....<br>
><br>
> New wave based on new principles, which could/should include substantive p2p<br>
> practices<br>
><br>
> However, the underlying biospheric and civilisational crisis may very well<br>
> complicate things substantially, this may very well be the last wave of<br>
> capitalism<br>
><br>
> Sam, I remember you place the congruence of ecological crisis in 2030, do<br>
> you have any sources on that?<br>
><br>
> Michel<br>
><br>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------<br>
> From: Michel Bauwens <<a href="mailto:michel@p2pfoundation.net">michel@p2pfoundation.net</a>><br>
> Date: Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 4:57 PM<br>
> Subject: Re: Student Paper<br>
> To: ben zand <<a href="mailto:benzand57@gmail.com">benzand57@gmail.com</a>><br>
><br>
><br>
> Dear Ben<br>
><br>
> thanks for that email and I pretty much agree with your summary of the world<br>
> situation,<br>
><br>
> not sure though where I can find these data,<br>
><br>
> but here is a summary by Ted Trainer:<br>
> <a href="http://p2pfoundation.net/Radical_Implications_of_a_Zero_Growth_Economy" target="_blank">http://p2pfoundation.net/Radical_Implications_of_a_Zero_Growth_Economy</a><br>
><br>
> (see also below, I"m adding stuff as I think of it)<br>
><br>
> and this is probably quite important:<br>
> <a href="http://p2pfoundation.net/Planetary_Boundaries" target="_blank">http://p2pfoundation.net/Planetary_Boundaries</a><br>
><br>
> "The following points drive home the magnitude of the overshoot:<br>
><br>
> If the 9 billion people we will have on earth within about 50 years were to<br>
> use resources at the per capita rate of the rich countries, annual resource<br>
> production would have to be about 8 times as great as it is now.<br>
> If 9 billion people were to have a North American diet we would need about<br>
> 4.5 billion ha of cropland, but there are only 1.4 billion ha of cropland on<br>
> the planet.<br>
> Water resources are scarce and dwindling. What will the situation be if 9<br>
> billion people try to use water as we in rich countries do, while the<br>
> greenhouse problem reduces water resources.<br>
> The world�s fisheries are in serious trouble now, most of them overfished<br>
> and in decline. What happens if 9 billion people try to eat fish at the rate<br>
> Australian�s do now?<br>
> Several mineral and other resources are likely to be very scarce soon,<br>
> including gallium, indium, helium, and there are worries about copper, zinc,<br>
> silver and phosphorous.<br>
> Oil and gas are likely to be in decline soon, and largely unavailable in the<br>
> second half of the century. If 9 billion were to consume oil at the<br>
> Australian per capita rate, world demand would be about 5 times as great as<br>
> it is now. The seriousness of this is extreme, given the heavy dependence of<br>
> our society on liquid fuels.<br>
> Recent 'Footprint' analysis indicates that it takes 8 ha of productive land<br>
> to provide water, energy, settlement area and food for one person living in<br>
> Australia. (World Wildlife Fund, 2009.) So if 9 billion people were to live<br>
> as we do about 72 billion ha of productive land would be needed. But that is<br>
> about 10 times all the available productive land on the planet.<br>
> The most disturbing argument is to do with the greenhouse problem. It is<br>
> very likely that in order to stop the carbon content of the atmosphere<br>
> rising to dangerous levels CO2 emissions will have to be totally eliminated<br>
> by 2050 (Hansen says 2030). (Hansen, 2009, Meinschausen et al., 2009.)<br>
> Geo-sequestration can�t enable this, if only because it can only capture<br>
> about 85% of the 50% of emissions that come from stationary sources like<br>
> power stations."<br>
><br>
> some sources to check:<br>
><br>
> <a href="http://p2pfoundation.net/Energy_Scenarios" target="_blank">http://p2pfoundation.net/Energy_Scenarios</a><br>
><br>
> <a href="http://p2pfoundation.net/Powerdown_Scenarios" target="_blank">http://p2pfoundation.net/Powerdown_Scenarios</a><br>
><br>
> <a href="http://p2pfoundation.net/Sustainable_Shrinkage" target="_blank">http://p2pfoundation.net/Sustainable_Shrinkage</a><br>
><br>
> I recommend you take a look at 'overall policy frameworks', see<br>
><br>
> Introduction:<br>
><br>
> On the Necessity of Mediation for Economic and Social Transitions. Christian<br>
> Arnsperger.<br>
> Christian Arnsperger: The Concept of Transition. [38]<br>
><br>
> Ways to organize P2P-Commons oriented proposals in a coherent whole:<br>
><br>
> The Five Capitals Model<br>
> Seven Acupuncture Points for Shifting to Capitalism 3.0. Otto Scharmer.<br>
> David Korten: Seven Global Sources of Dysfunction and their Corresponding<br>
> Corrective Actions<br>
> Christian Arnsperger: Six Framework Conditions for Global Systemic Change<br>
> The New Economy Working Group, with David Korten, Nine Action Clusters and<br>
> Three Defining System Conditions<br>
> 11 Structural Problems of the Current World System<br>
><br>
> That's it for today!<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 12:36 AM, ben zand <<a href="mailto:benzand57@gmail.com">benzand57@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> Great. Again I deeply appreciate your time and efforts for humanity. And I<br>
>> do not expect any complete answers as I think that is beyond the scope of<br>
>> any one mind to comprehend with he interweaving complexities of today. I am<br>
>> beginning my paper by looking at the economic realities which<br>
>> drive�the�world and determine possibilities. Which in itself, I feel, is one<br>
>> of the root problems of humanity. Developed countries have become infatuated<br>
>> with growth and economic measures as the goals for society. This obviously<br>
>> isn't going to create a�benevolent�world as each country competes for<br>
>> exponential growth in a limited planet. Now it seems the United States, the<br>
>> engine and absorber, of economic growth has reached its limits<br>
>> of�consumption�as the population cannot service much new added debt, which<br>
>> allowed it to maintain this position. The globalist appear to look toward<br>
>> China and the developing world as the next engine after the next black swan<br>
>> induced market crash depresses the economy and�destabilizes�the U.S.'s<br>
>> position. In any plan to create new structures for the future of humanity,<br>
>> we must first roughly understand the environment in which they will be<br>
>> created and the palpability of these new possible changes.<br>
>> So first question: Is it possible, or do you know of resources and data I<br>
>> can look at, to maintain the exponential growth the economic structures<br>
>> require? Id appreciate any other reflections or ideas you have about how<br>
>> this relatively short-term scenario could possibly play out.<br>
>> Ben<br>
><br>
><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</div></div>--<br>
--<br>
Sam Rose<br>
Hollymead Capital Partners, LLC<br>
Cel: +1-(517)-974-6451<br>
email: <a href="mailto:samuel.rose@gmail.com">samuel.rose@gmail.com</a><br>
<a href="http://hollymeadcapital.com" target="_blank">http://hollymeadcapital.com</a><br>
<a href="http://p2pfoundation.net" target="_blank">http://p2pfoundation.net</a><br>
<a href="http://futureforwardinstitute.com" target="_blank">http://futureforwardinstitute.com</a><br>
<a href="http://socialmediaclassroom.com" target="_blank">http://socialmediaclassroom.com</a><br>
<br>
"The universe is not required to be in perfect harmony with human<br>
ambition." - Carl Sagan<br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>P2P Foundation: <a href="http://p2pfoundation.net" target="_blank">http://p2pfoundation.net</a>� - <a href="http://blog.p2pfoundation.net" target="_blank">http://blog.p2pfoundation.net</a> <br>
<br>Connect: <a href="http://p2pfoundation.ning.com" target="_blank">http://p2pfoundation.ning.com</a>; Discuss:�<a href="http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation" target="_blank">http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation</a><div>
<br>Updates: <a href="http://del.icio.us/mbauwens" target="_blank">http://del.icio.us/mbauwens</a>; <a href="http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens" target="_blank">http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens</a>; <a href="http://twitter.com/mbauwens" target="_blank">http://twitter.com/mbauwens</a>; <a href="http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens" target="_blank">http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens</a><br>
</div><br>