<div class="gmail_quote">hi michel - responses throughout</div><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><br><br>Thank you very much for your comments and attachments, I look forward to news of your completed phd research, for mentioning on the p2p blog,<br>
<br>just for info, p2p in the sense we are using at the p2p foundation is not per se linked to the internet, it's essentially a relational dynamic, one of the four mentioned by Alan Page Fiske and which he calls communal shareholding, the only thing we are saying is that this particular dynamic, is expanding as the time/space limitations change through new technological affordances<br>
</blockquote><div><br></div><div>yes, i am quite familiar with your vision. my reference to the net was directed to ANT. people often think it's somehow about the internet because it has network in the name.�</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<br>as for foucault and Latour, is your summary is true, one would have to dismiss the big phase transitions that have already occured in the past, such as the massive changes involved in the shift from feudalism to capitalism ... I can hardly believe they would deny such overwhelming historical realities ?? or has anything changed in human nature and social structures to make what was once a regular occurence, into an impossibility?<br>
</blockquote><div><br></div><div>i'm no historian, so i am reluctant to comment here, but foucault was always a thinker of�continuity�and discontinuity. he was critical of the idea of revolution as it overlooked the continuities between seemingly different governmental forms. the classic example, and one also taken up by the frankfurt school, debord and others as well, is sovietism and its centralised, totalitarian style. on the other hand, practices and discourses that appear continuous (capitalism, liberalism etc) change constantly. this is all pretty straightforward i think.</div>
<div><br></div><div>i haven't read latour on the question of large scale change - i don't think he has written on it but i could be wrong. i'd guess he wouldn't say it isn't possible, just very difficult. he's written a great book about a failed attempt to introduce a new form of public transport in paris, titled Aramis, where he details the difficulty of implementing a great idea that everyone seemingly agrees upon.</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<br>in my almost non-existent knowledge of latour, one thing that struck me as p2p was the relationship with objects,<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>yes, his work is thoroughly posthuman, but that's another story.</div>
<div><br></div><div>best</div><div><br></div><div>nate�</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><font color="#888888"><br>Michel</font><div><div></div><div class="h5">
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 5:08 PM, nathaniel tkacz <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:nathanieltkacz@gmail.com" target="_blank">nathanieltkacz@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204);padding-left:1ex">Hi Michel, Jussi, P2P list,<div><br></div><div>My PhD thesis is somewhat of an ANT-informed analysis of political openness, read through the case study of Wikipedia. I wish it were done, so I could give you a sense of what an ANT account of P2P might look - although I'm by no means a faithful disciple! I see ANT more as a method-ontology: it is a set of claims about reality that in turn proposes a particular type of analysis. There is most�definitely�a politics to it, but it's not really activist. Indeed, I would suggest that for Latour, much like Foucault but for different reasons, massive change of the type envisioned by p2p is not possible.�</div>
<div><br></div><div>Anyway, I won't get into it unless there is a desire to have a conversation about it. I've attached Prince of Networks, Reassembling the Social and also John Law's After Method.�</div><div>
<br></div><div>A few quick pointers:</div><div><br></div><div>ANT has nothing to do, like Jussi wrote, with the Internet. Actor-Network is a statement about reality.</div><div><br></div><div>Harman's book is an exposition of the philosophy that underpins Latour's work. It's definitely helpful, but it's a very particular take.</div>
<div><br></div><div>If I was to read an explication of ANT I would start with John Law's After Method. I think it's better than Reassembling the Social.</div><div><br></div><div>Finally, although it's not an explication of ANT and P2P, I recently had a well-intentioned but heated debate with Johan Soderberg and Mathieu O'Neil over at the CSPP Journal about ANT and activism. You can find it here:</div>
<div><br></div><div><a href="http://cspp.oekonux.org/debate/ant-power" target="_blank">http://cspp.oekonux.org/debate/ant-power</a></div><div><br></div><div>It seems that in Europe ANT has quite a bad wrap and is seen as an apology for capitalism or anything else conservative or boring. Here in the land of Oz, the cultures seem more fresh and lively and more philosophical. Latour is read in the tradition of Deleuze, Serres, Foucault (for me anyway) and other process-based thinkers.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Let me know if you want anything more, I have quite the catalogue!</div><div><br></div><div>Best</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br clear="all">Nate Tkacz <br><br>School of Culture and Communication<br>
University of Melbourne<br><br>Twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/__nate__" target="_blank">http://twitter.com/__nate__</a><br><br>Research Page: <a href="http://nathanieltkacz.net" target="_blank">http://nathanieltkacz.net</a><br>
<br>Current project: <a href="http://networkcultures.org/wpmu/cpov/about-2/" target="_blank">http://networkcultures.org/wpmu/cpov/about-2/</a><br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div><div></div><div>On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 7:31 AM, Michel Bauwens <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:michelsub2004@gmail.com" target="_blank">michelsub2004@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
</div></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204);padding-left:1ex"><div><div></div><div>
thanks Jussi!<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Parikka, Jussi <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:Jussi.Parikka@anglia.ac.uk" target="_blank">Jussi.Parikka@anglia.ac.uk</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204);padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<br>
<p><font size="2">Dear Michel<br>
<br>
well, I am biased, as I have always liked Latour's work - even if its not without its problems. I have been glancing at Prince of Networks, but would also recommend Reassemblign the Social by Latour himself; in terms of P2P, there interesting texts include that is called something like "On the difficulty of ANT", which is written as if an interview, and makes the point that actor-network-theory is not necessarily about "networks" in the concrete sense we often think they are...<br>
<br>
<a href="http://books.google.de/books?id=DlgNiBaYo-YC&printsec=frontcover&dq=reassembling+the+social&hl=de&ei=uWWATc-2MIrMswb7qcXlBg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CDAQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q&f=false" target="_blank">http://books.google.de/books?id=DlgNiBaYo-YC&printsec=frontcover&dq=reassembling+the+social&hl=de&ei=uWWATc-2MIrMswb7qcXlBg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CDAQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q&f=false</a><br>
<br>
So definitely no direct translation to P2P perhaps, but that might make the task to think P2P through only more interesting... to use Latour to think of the various levels, scales, actants of which P2P is constituted: from human actions to legal frameworks, physical infrastructures to social desires, all meshed and mixed...<br>
<br>
best<br>
J<br>
<br>
______________________________________________________<br>
Dr Jussi Parikka<br>
Director of CoDE: The Cultures of the Digital Economy-institute<br>
Reader in Media Theory & History<br>
Co-Director of Anglia Research Centre in Digital Culture (ArcDigital)<br>
Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge (UK)<br>
<br>
T: 0845 196 2851 (direct in UK)<br>
F: <a href="tel:%2B44%20%280%291223%20417707" target="_blank"></a><a href="tel:%2B44%20%280%291223%20417707" target="_blank">+44 (0)1223 417707</a><br>
<br>
<a href="http://jussiparikka.net" target="_blank">http://jussiparikka.net</a><br>
<a href="http://www.anglia.ac.uk/code" target="_blank">http://www.anglia.ac.uk/code</a><br>
<a href="http://www.anglia.ac.uk/arcdigital" target="_blank">http://www.anglia.ac.uk/arcdigital</a><br>
<br>
*Book news*: Insect Media: An Archaeology of Animals and Technology is published by University of Minnesota Press:<br>
<a href="http://www.upress.umn.edu/Books/P/parikka_insect.html" target="_blank">http://www.upress.umn.edu/Books/P/parikka_insect.html</a></font></p><div><div><font size="2"></font></div><div><div><div></div><div>
<font size="2"><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
-----Original Message-----<br>
From: Michel Bauwens [<a href="mailto:michelsub2004@gmail.com" target="_blank">mailto:michelsub2004@gmail.com</a>]<br>
Sent: Wed 16/03/2011 6:10<br>
To: p2p-foundation<br>
Cc: Andy Robinson; phoebe moore; Samuel Rose; Paul B. Hartzog; Parikka, Jussi<br>
Subject: prince of networks and grid group theory<br>
<br>
Dear friends,<br>
<br>
I have a question: should I read Prince of Networks, a biography of Bruno<br>
Latour, as perhaps constitutive of p2p-oriented theorizing? So the question<br>
really is: should I know more about Latour?<br>
<br>
I have only found a version which seems not copy-able or even printable, see<br>
<a href="http://www.re-press.org/book-files/OA_Version_780980544060_Prince_of_Networks.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.re-press.org/book-files/OA_Version_780980544060_Prince_of_Networks.pdf</a><br>
, can this be hacked or has anyone access to another version?<br>
<br>
My second question is for Paul: could you have a look at the theory and book<br>
mentioned below? Comments would be very welcome,<br>
<br>
Michel<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
via<br>
<a href="http://charlesvanderhaegen.wordpress.com/2010/11/15/einstein-capitalism-socialism-machiavelli-and-vested-interests-preventing-clumsy-solutions-for-betterment-of-our-world/" target="_blank">http://charlesvanderhaegen.wordpress.com/2010/11/15/einstein-capitalism-socialism-machiavelli-and-vested-interests-preventing-clumsy-solutions-for-betterment-of-our-world/</a><br>
<br>
This brings me to the subject of a theory - it sails mainly under the name<br>
Cultural Theory but also Theory of Plural Rationality, Grid-Group Theory,<br>
Theory of Socio-Cultural Viability and even Neo-Durkheimian Institutional<br>
Theory -� of which the foundations were lead by Mary Douglas, and<br>
courageously further developed by her followers, the leading researcher of<br>
which is Michael Thompson.<br>
<br>
I strongly recommend the book he edited with Marco Verweij: "Clumsy<br>
Solutions for a Complex World:� Governance, Politics and Plural Perceptions"<br>
published by Palgrave.<br>
<br>
It is a powerful and original statement on why well-intended attempts to<br>
alleviate pressing social ills so often derail, and how effective, efficient<br>
and broadly accepted solutions to social problems can be found.<br>
<br>
It takes its cue from the idea that our endlessly changing and complex<br>
social worlds consist of ceaseless interactions between four organising,<br>
justifying and perceiving social relations. Each time one of these<br>
perspectives is excluded from collective decision-making, governance failure<br>
inevitably result. Successful solutions are therefore creative combinations<br>
of four opposing ways of organising and thinking. The book shows the force<br>
of these theoretically sophisticated, yet simple and practical ideas for a<br>
number of pressing issues from around the World.<br>
<br>
To introduce you to the matter, you might follow the link hereafter. It will<br>
lead you to what is substantially the first chapter of the book:<br>
<a href="https://mercury.smu.edu.sg/rsrchpubupload/3224/SMUPreprint.pdf" target="_blank">https://mercury.smu.edu.sg/rsrchpubupload/3224/SMUPreprint.pdf</a><br>
<br>
<br>
--<br>
P2P Foundation: <a href="http://p2pfoundation.net" target="_blank">http://p2pfoundation.net</a>� - <a href="http://blog.p2pfoundation.net" target="_blank">http://blog.p2pfoundation.net</a><br>
<br>
Connect: <a href="http://p2pfoundation.ning.com;" target="_blank">http://p2pfoundation.ning.com;</a> Discuss:<br>
<a href="http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation" target="_blank">http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation</a><br>
<br>
Updates: <a href="http://del.icio.us/mbauwens;" target="_blank">http://del.icio.us/mbauwens;</a> <a href="http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens;" target="_blank">http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens;</a><br>
<a href="http://twitter.com/mbauwens;" target="_blank">http://twitter.com/mbauwens;</a> <a href="http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens" target="_blank">http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens</a><br></font></div></div></div></div><font size="2">
--<br>
Email has been scanned for viruses by Altman Technologies' email management service -<br>
<a href="http://www.altman.co.uk/emailsystems" target="_blank">www.altman.co.uk/emailsystems</a><br>
<br>
</font>
<p></p>
EMERGING EXCELLENCE: In the Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) 2008, more than 30% of our submissions were rated
as 'Internationally Excellent' or 'World-leading'.<br>Among the academic disciplines now rated 'World-leading' are
Allied Health Professions & Studies; Art & Design; English Language & Literature; Geography & Environmental Studies;
History; Music; Psychology; and Social Work & Social Policy & Administration.
<br>
Visit <a href="http://www.anglia.ac.uk/rae" target="_blank">www.anglia.ac.uk/rae</a> for more information.
<br><br>
This e-mail and any attachments are intended for the above named recipient(s) only and may be privileged. If they
have come to you in error you must take no action based on them, nor must you copy or show them to anyone: please
reply to this e-mail to highlight the error and then immediately delete the e-mail from your system.
<br><br>
Any opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of
Anglia Ruskin University.
<br><br>
Although measures have been taken to ensure that this e-mail and attachments are free from any virus we advise
that, in keeping with good computing practice, the recipient should ensure they are actually virus free. Please
note that this message has been sent over public networks which may not be a 100% secure communications
<br><br>
<p><font face="Arial" size="2"><a href="http://www.altman.co.uk/emailsystems" target="_blank">Email has been
scanned for viruses by Altman Technologies' email management service</a></font></p></div>
</blockquote></div><div><div></div><div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>P2P Foundation: <a href="http://p2pfoundation.net" target="_blank">http://p2pfoundation.net</a>� - <a href="http://blog.p2pfoundation.net" target="_blank">http://blog.p2pfoundation.net</a> <br>
<br>Connect: <a href="http://p2pfoundation.ning.com" target="_blank">http://p2pfoundation.ning.com</a>; Discuss: <a href="http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation" target="_blank">http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation</a><br>
<br>Updates: <a href="http://del.icio.us/mbauwens" target="_blank">http://del.icio.us/mbauwens</a>; <a href="http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens" target="_blank">http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens</a>; <a href="http://twitter.com/mbauwens" target="_blank">http://twitter.com/mbauwens</a>; <a href="http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens" target="_blank">http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens</a><br>
<br><br><br><br><br>
</div></div><br></div></div>_______________________________________________<br>
P2P Foundation - Mailing list<br>
<a href="http://www.p2pfoundation.net" target="_blank">http://www.p2pfoundation.net</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation" target="_blank">https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br></div></div>-- <br><div><div></div><div class="h5">P2P Foundation: <a href="http://p2pfoundation.net" target="_blank">http://p2pfoundation.net</a>� - <a href="http://blog.p2pfoundation.net" target="_blank">http://blog.p2pfoundation.net</a> <br>
<br>Connect: <a href="http://p2pfoundation.ning.com" target="_blank">http://p2pfoundation.ning.com</a>; Discuss: <a href="http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation" target="_blank">http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation</a><br>
<br>Updates: <a href="http://del.icio.us/mbauwens" target="_blank">http://del.icio.us/mbauwens</a>; <a href="http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens" target="_blank">http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens</a>; <a href="http://twitter.com/mbauwens" target="_blank">http://twitter.com/mbauwens</a>; <a href="http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens" target="_blank">http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens</a><br>
<br><br><br><br><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>