[P2P-F] Fwd: Weekend Roundup: A Forgotten Prophet Whose Time Has Come

Michel Bauwens michelsub2004 at gmail.com
Mon Aug 16 17:56:13 CEST 2021

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Noema Magazine <newsletter at noemamag.com>
Date: Sat, Aug 14, 2021 at 6:05 PM
Subject: Weekend Roundup: A Forgotten Prophet Whose Time Has Come
To: <michelsub2004 at gmail.com>

Ivan Illich’s radical critique of our modern certitudes resonates loudly
amid today’s crises.
AUGUST 14, 2021
Weekend Roundup:
A Forgotten Prophet Whose Time Has Come
Ivan Illich’s radical critique of our modern certitudes resonates loudly
amid today’s crises.

View the roundup in your browser here
Visit Noema Magazine at noemamag.com
Clay Rodery for Noema Magazine
Beset as we are these days by the cascading consequences of climate change
and the descent into dysfunction of our social institutions, it is worth
remembering Ivan Illich, a forgotten prophet whose time has come.

Fortunately, two books on the 1970s apostle of the era of limits remind us
of his prescient relevance: “Ivan Illich: An Intellectual Journey
published by his friend and long-time interlocutor David Cayley this year,
and “The Prophet of Cuernavaca: Ivan Illich and the Crisis of the West
by Todd Hartch.

Cayley’s book benefits from his long personal acquaintance and countless
conversations over the years with Illich. Hartch, who never met Illich,
offers a more objective account informed by critical distance from his
subject. Both trace Illich from his early days as a parish priest in the
impoverished Puerto Rican neighborhoods of New York to becoming vice-rector
of the Catholic University of Puerto Rico to the long period in Cuernavaca,
Mexico, where he sought to de-imperialize Catholic missionaries and hosted
the radical thinkers of his day, to the striking story of his suffering and

Illich was a purveyor of impossible truths, truths so radical that they
questioned the very foundations of modern certitudes — progress, economic
growth, health, education, mobility. While he was not wrong, we had all
been riding on a train going in the opposite direction for so long that it
was hard to see how, in any practical sense, the momentum could ever be
stalled. And that was his point. Now that “the shadow our future throws” of
which Illich warned is darkening the skies of the present, it is time to
reconsider his thought.
Illich’s central contention was that persons are relational beings embedded
in a matrix of the natural cosmos, convivial community with others and, as
a fallen but still faithful priest, God’s grace. As the maverick thinker
saw it, Western modernity rent asunder this multidimensional oneness of

For Illich, 17th-century science departed from the past by privileging the
role of humans in the cosmos as above and apart from all other being. In
doing so, it effectively declared “the death of nature,” turning it into a
“resource” to feed the “pleonexia,” or radical greed, which fueled
“development” and “progress” that transmuted endless “wants” into “needs.”

As Illich saw it, the rise of universalizing social technologies — that is,
institutions managed by strangers — transgressed the traditional bounds of
diverse vernacular communities and harnessed human endeavor to a trajectory
of limitless growth, creating a “radical monopoly” over the ways and means
of living that blunted any alternative to industrializing the desires of
consumer society. In the process, persons and communities alike were
deprived of the practical knowledge to shape tools according to their own
defined needs and choices. Robbed of such competence, they became servants
to the logic of those institutions instead of the other way around.

Conviviality vs. Productivity

Illich defined conviviality as “autonomous and creative intercourse among
persons, and the intercourse of persons with their environment.” He
contrasted this to “the conditioned response of persons to the demands made
upon them by others” from above and afar in the name of advancing progress.
“I consider conviviality to be individual freedom realized in personal
interdependence and, as such, an intrinsic ethical value,” he wrote in
“Tools for Conviviality.” “I believe that, in any society, as conviviality
is reduced below a certain level, no amount of industrial productivity can
effectively satisfy the needs it creates among society’s members.”

Illich didn’t stop there. His greatest insight was that when conviviality
is swapped for productivity, monopolizing institutions that chart a
singular path at mass scale become counterproductive to their original
intent beyond a certain threshold. In his words, “By breaching the limits
set on man by nature and history, industrial society engendered disability
and suffering in the name of eliminating disability and suffering. … The
warming biosphere is making it intolerable to think of industrial growth as
progress; now it appears to us as aggression against the human condition.”

In his book “Energy and Equity” Illich illustrated this point in terms all
could easily understand. As anyone who has driven on a freeway would agree,
individual mobility turns into collective congestion when everyone has a
car. In this he was in league with the “small is beautiful” thinkers at the
time such as Leopold Kohr and E. F. Schumacher.

The Virtue Of Enoughness

In his radically provocative way, Illich preached the “virtue of
enoughness” as the frugal way out of a headlong rush to an untenable
future. Indeed, in the 1980s he subsisted in the small hamlet of Ocotepec,
about 50 miles from Mexico City, where I visited him one summer along with
my wife Lilly and former California Governor Jerry Brown. The streets were
unpaved with no streetlights. Packs of feral dogs, chickens and the odd
burro roamed freely. Scorpions scuttled across the floors and walls. The
austere room where Illich slept was adorned with nothing other than a
massive crucifix. At the back of the compound, incongruously, stood a
rustic library filled with rare Latin volumes where he labored in “the
vineyard of the texts” like one of his idols, Hugh of Saint Victor. Over
lunches of watery lentil soup and weak fruit juice, he would often invite
over the “Red Bishops” of Cuernavaca and Chiapas for convivial banter. At
night we would sit up drinking cheap Presidente brandy, pondering the fate
of civilization.

Illich carried his theme across the entire institutional landscape of
modern society. In one of his most famously controversial books,
“Deschooling Society,” he argued that the graduated credentialism of mass
education actually made people more ignorant by standardizing what they can
know and think about.

In those early days of cybernetics, he hoped that the recursive feedback
loops of information systems might help foster an “ecology of mind,” as the
anthropologist Gregory Bateson framed it, re-embedding the person in the
larger matrix of being. Yet he suspected in the end it would not turn out
so well, instead feeding the illusion that humans could escape the limits
of their condition through their tools. As we have now come to see, the
algorithms of Big Tech are, after all, only mathematical institutions
programmed to bolster the very modern certitudes Illich fundamentally
questioned, accelerating “progress” along an unsustainable trajectory that
would continue to wreak ruin on the planet and reduce, not enhance,
personal autonomy.

Here, too, he echoed other thinkers of his time like Jacques Ellul. The
French theologian anticipated the surveillance capitalism of the digital
age, believing that a technological society ends up imprisoning personal
self-determination instead of liberating it.

Brave New Biocracy

It was perhaps with respect to health that Illich was most radical. He
decried “the sacralization of ‘a life’” dis-embedded from the oneness of
Life and fetishized as a detached immune system to be managed from sperm to
worm by the “brave new biocracy” of modern medicine.

For Illich, vaccines, clean water and simple hygiene like washing hands
were responsible for most health advances. But he was blistering in his
critique of our medical systems oriented toward postponing the end as long
as possible. “We now see that a majority of these medical achievements are
deceptive misnomers, actually prolonging the suffering of madmen, cripples,
old fools and monsters,” he wrote.

In his book “Medical Nemesis” Illich spoke of “iatrogenic illness” —
illness caused by the “bureaucracy” of physicians who abandoned the ancient
idea of health as “balance” within the environment in which a person lived.
Such a healthy balance could not be achieved, he argued, in an unhealthy
environment poisoned by untamed industrial growth.

Illich walked the talk. He suffered in his last years from a cancerous
tumor that grew to the size of a baseball on one side of his face.
“Renouncing” the biocratic management of his health, Illich insisted on the
“hygienic autonomy” of self-care and “the right to die without diagnosis.”
When the pain was too great during the final phase of his life, he would
seek relief by standing on his head against a wall or by smoking opium in a
little pipe he carried around with him.

In his more obscure and less public observations, Illich saw the Catholic
Church’s depersonalized “kindness of strangers” as a corruption of the
Christian act of charity institutionalized as a kind of inauthentic
paternalism. In his book, Cayley suggests that Illich’s broad critique of
the institutions of Western modernity were metaphors for an attack on the
Catholic Church’s perversion of the personal experience of incarnation he
was unwilling to make frontally, a kind of hidden theology that threaded
through all his work. To the extent this errant pilgrim’s critique of the
splintering and shattering of the oneness of Life can be considered
theology, it is not so much hidden as constitutive of all Illich’s

One does not have to embrace Illich’s romanticization of premodern times to
grasp his relevance for the future headed our way. We appear to be entering
a new pivotal age in which the modern certitudes he so thoroughly
questioned are near exhaustion, finally opening the social imagination to
the kind of fundamental reconsideration that seemed so radical in Illich’s
day, but no longer do.
Issue II is here! Click here to become a print subscriber.
Read more articles at Noema Magazine
EDITORIAL STAFF: Nathan Gardels (Editor-in-Chief), Kathleen Miles
(Executive Editor), Nils Gilman (Deputy Editor), Peter Mellgard (Senior
Editor), Alex Gardels (Video Editor), Rosa O’Hara (Audience Growth Editor),
Farida Amar (Art Director), Mani Chandy (Newsletter Editor), Rachel Bauch
(Art Editor), Tobias Rees (Philosophy + Art Editor), Jennifer Bourne
(Associate Editor & Translator), Yakov Feygin (Associate Editor), Tui Shaub
(Associate Editor), Mashinka Hakopian (Associate Editor)

EDITORIAL BOARD: Orhan Pamuk, Pankaj Mishra, Dambisa Moyo, Rocio
Martinez-Sampere, Patrick Soon-Shiong, Onora O’Neill, Elif Shafak, Reid
Hoffman, Walter Isaacson, Arianna Huffington, Pico Iyer, Yoichi Funabashi,
Fareed Zakaria, Helle Thorning-Schmidt, Nicolas Berggruen, Kathleen Miles,
Nathan Gardels, Bing Song

21st CENTURY ADVISORY COUNCIL: Jacques Attali, Shaukat Aziz, Marek Belka,
Zheng Bijian, Tony Blair, Gordon Brown, James Cameron, Fernando Henrique
Cardoso, Jacques Delors, Jack Dorsey, Mohamed El-Erian, John Elkaan, Niall
Ferguson, Francis Fukuyama, Anthony Giddens, Felipe Gonzalez, John Gray,
Reid Hoffman, Fred Hu, Mo Ibrahim, Otmar Issing, Alexei Kudrin, Pascal
Lamy, Kishore Mahbubani, Alain Minc, Mario Monti, Dambisa Moyo, Elon Musk,
Pierre Omidyar, Raghuram Rajan, Nouriel Roubini, Nicolas Sarkozy, Eric
Schmidt, Gerhard Schroeder, Peter Schwartz, Amartya Sen, Jeff Skoll,
Michael Spence, Joe Stiglitz, Larry Summers, Helle Thorning-Schmidt, Laura
Tyson, Guy Verhofstadt, George Yeo, Fareed Zakaria, Ernesto Zedillo
[image: Facebook] ‌
Twitter] ‌
Instagram] ‌
YouTube] ‌
LinkedIn] ‌
Noema Magazine | Bradbury Building, 304 S. Broadway, Suite 500, Los
Angeles, CA 90013
Unsubscribe michelsub2004 at gmail.com
Update Profile
| Constant Contact Data Notice
Sent by newsletter at noemamag.com

P2P Foundation: http://wiki.p2pfoundation.net <http://p2pfoundation.net>  -

Discuss: http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation

Updates: ; http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens

Curation of news on p2p/commons developments:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ourproject.org/pipermail/p2p-foundation/attachments/20210816/21b9057a/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the P2P-Foundation mailing list