[P2P-F] commons and households

Sun Oct 15 07:13:15 CEST 2017

thanks Kevin, good point,

Michel

Message: 1
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2017 14:13:47 -0500
From: Kevin Carson <free.market.anticapitalist at gmail.com>
To: P2P Foundation mailing list <p2p-foundation at lists.ourproject.org>
Subject: Re: [P2P-F] thinking true meta-governance and the gaps in p2p
        theory regarding the household economy
Message-ID:
        <CANETeEz58DrDsYAbc9bnak18Z5JnFZHUN102QtdQbXj13VFLuA at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

IMO the boundary between the household and the larger informal/social
economy is very permeable. The nuclear family household is relatively
recent and artificial, and to a considerable extent encouraged by 20th
century capitalism's promotion of social atomization which reduced the
household to the smallest possible size which would still socialize
the costs of reproducing labor-power and the culture of obedience
without providing a potential base for cost-, income- and risk-pooling
which might increase the bargaining power of labor. It's quite likely
that as total labor hours decline and precarity increases, we'll see a
lot more not only of multi-generational houses but of multi-family
cohousing, micro-villages and the like that internalize an increasing
share of direct production for use.
-- 
Check out the Commons Transition Plan here at: http://commonstransition.org


P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net  - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net

<http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation>Updates:
http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens

#82 on the (En)Rich list: http://enrichlist.org/the-complete-list/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ourproject.org/pipermail/p2p-foundation/attachments/20171015/88370295/attachment.html>