[P2P-F] [NetworkedLabour] NEW FROM VERSO: INVENTING THE FUTURE BY NICK SRNICEK AND ALEX WILLIAMS

Sun Nov 8 17:07:00 CET 2015

I use 'stack' as well, in the context of an 'open source stack' for
sustainable (free, fair and sustainable) production,

i.e. different layers,

design layer, community design for resiliance /abundance rather than
planned obsolescence

open sourcing design, logistics , accounting to obtain true circular economy

mutualizing physical resources

p2p capital to avoid financial tax of banking system

distributed machinery for local production on demand, to avoid
transportation costs, artificial needs, and overproduction

etc ..

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Anna Harris <anna at shsh.co.uk> wrote:

> Yes. I think the authors are clear. This has to be an international
> movement, with long term goals, rather than national or local political
> aims.
>
> "It would mean building upon the post-nation-state territory of 'the
> stack' - that global infrastructure that enables our digital world today".
>
> Could others enlighten what is meant by 'the stack'?
>
> Anna
>
> On 3 Nov 2015, at 02:18, Michel Bauwens <michel at p2pfoundation.net> wrote:
>
> I don't see how this is contradictory,
>
> we don't have the power to implement this in the world, 'all at once' but
> certain regions and countries can set the example ; there are also groups
> working for a global BIG but I can't recall the name for now
>
> At least while we wait for this,
> http://p2pfoundation.net/International_Simultaneous_Policy_Organization
>
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 6:40 AM, fabian at fabiant.eu <fabian at fabiant.eu>
> wrote:
>
>> Well, the problem is more that it is not very well thought out and coming
>> out over 50 years after Jorn's *Situationists and Automation *I feel we
>> should have something a bit more coherent. (I am sorry, I was just reading
>> that this afternoon)
>>
>> If the idea is that this is universal, i.e. guaranteed to everyone
>> regardless of their national documentation, immigration status etc. etc.
>> well then it does have profound implications. But hey, I don't think that's
>> what is being discussed - can anyone go to Brazil and get some of this
>> B.I.G.?
>>
>> Anything else reinforces xenophobia as can be seen in the UK where
>> anti-immigration sentiments have been whipped up by talk about benefit
>> tourism.
>>
>> I don't understand how having B.I.G. in one country can take us much
>> further than another debased form of socialism in one country?
>>
>> all the best
>>
>> Fabian
>>
>>
>>
>> On 02 November 2015 at 12:36 Michel Bauwens <michel at p2pfoundation.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> agreed,
>>
>> but I think there is one thing that proponents underestimate,
>>
>> as Polanyi showed, making labour into a commodity was really central for
>> capitalism, and the basic income would profoundly undo that, in fact making
>> labour into a commons,
>>
>> it is worth fighting for, but let's not imagine it will be easy as this
>> is in fact a very radical proposal, which will overturn a lot of common
>> logics .. for example, it is likely that intellectual jobs will be paid
>> less, physical labor more, as no one will want to do them,
>>
>> Michel
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 7:32 PM, Anna Harris <anna at shsh.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>
>> I agree with you Michel, it is not necessary to the argument for basic
>> income. But it enables us to see the *necessity* for the BI rather than
>> seeing it as just a utopian dream. The lack of jobs, and the continued
>> demand for people to be in work, makes no sense unless you see it in the
>> background of developing automation which is replacing labour, and which is
>> traditionally resisted by labour. It is this attitude which needs to open
>> to seeing automation as serving our interests rather than being the enemy
>> which deprives us of work.
>>
>> Anna
>>
>> On 2 Nov 2015, at 12:05, Michel Bauwens < michel at p2pfoundation.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> this hypothesis weakens the book in my opinion, it is not necessary to
>> posit this to be for the basic income ...
>>
>> Michel
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 6:47 PM, Anna Harris <anna at shsh.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Good question Ursula, and not one I can answer fully. It is the term the
>> authors use on the book cover.
>> They say:
>> "FULL AUTOMATION
>> With automation.......machines can increasingly produce all necessary
>> goods and services, while also releasing humanity from the effort of
>> producing them. For this reason, we argue that the tendencies towards
>> automation and the replacement of human labour should be enthusiastically
>> accelerated and targeted as a political project of the left. This is a
>> project that takes an existing capitalist tendency and seeks to push it
>> beyond the acceptable parameters of capitalist social relations." (P109)
>>
>> A vision of a post work society where people's time is free to use as
>> they wish is the basis for this demand. If this becomes a project of the
>> left, hopefully there is more possibility to influence and guide this
>> tendency so that it serves all of humanity rather than just the few.
>>
>> Anna
>>
>> On 2 Nov 2015, at 10:00, Ursula Huws < ursulahuws at analyticaresearch.co.uk>
>> wrote:
>>
>> What do you mean by ‘full automation’? Ursula
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Anna Harris [mailto:anna at shsh.co.uk <anna at shsh.co.uk>]
>> *Sent:* 02 November 2015 09:19
>> *To:* networkedlabour at lists.contrast.org;
>> p2p-foundation at lists.ourproject.org
>> *Cc:* Ursula Huws <ursulahuws at analyticaresearch.co.uk>
>> *Subject:* NEW FROM VERSO: INVENTING THE FUTURE BY NICK SRNICEK AND ALEX
>> WILLIAMS
>>
>>
>>
>> This book offers the framework of building a campaign strategy around the
>> demand for full automation and a basic income for all. This is not a short
>> term demand but a vision of what can be achieved if labour groups come
>> together with academics and supporters to design the future.
>>
>>
>>
>> Personally I believe they have drawn the supporting network too narrowly.
>> But that only makes the case for this campaign even more strongly. I wrote
>> some time ago:
>>
>>
>>
>> BIG (basic income guaranteed) may be revolutionary, but it does not need
>> the economic system to change drastically in order to be introduced. In
>> that sense it is reformist, although the effects are revolutionary.
>> The big advantages are that
>> 1. it can be introduced without massive changes to the economic system.
>> 2. It is a very simple idea which can be appreciated by people without
>> much knowledge of the economy.
>> 3. It has been tried in pilot experiments, and found to be successful in
>> stimulating economic activity. (Brazil)
>> 4. Many economists agree (James Robertson, Jeremy Rifkin, Edward Snowden,
>> Richard Swift) that with technology replacing many jobs that previously
>> required human labour, BIG of some sort is necessary.
>> 5. Naomi Klein highlights it in her latest book This Changes Everything,
>> as one of the game changing battles that 'don't merely aim to change laws,
>> but changes patterns of thought.'(p 641)
>>
>>
>>
>> The authors are coming to Leeds for an open discussion on Nov 14.
>>
>>
>>
>> https://www.facebook.com/events/1624336424483090/
>>
>>
>>
>> I believe that this campaign could appeal widely across all political
>> spectrums, and would welcome more discussion on this list.
>>
>>
>>
>> Anna
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NetworkedLabour mailing list
>> NetworkedLabour at lists.contrast.org
>> http://lists.contrast.org/mailman/listinfo/networkedlabour
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Check out the Commons Transition Plan here at:
>> http://commonstransition.org
>>
>> P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net  - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net
>>
>> <http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation>Updates:
>> http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens
>>
>> #82 on the (En)Rich list: http://enrichlist.org/the-complete-list/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Check out the Commons Transition Plan here at:
>> http://commonstransition.org
>>
>> P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net  - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net
>>
>> <http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation>Updates:
>> http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens
>>
>> #82 on the (En)Rich list: http://enrichlist.org/the-complete-list/
>> _______________________________________________
>> NetworkedLabour mailing list
>> NetworkedLabour at lists.contrast.org
>> http://lists.contrast.org/mailman/listinfo/networkedlabour
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Check out the Commons Transition Plan here at:
> http://commonstransition.org
>
> P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net  - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net
>
> <http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation>Updates:
> http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens
>
> #82 on the (En)Rich list: http://enrichlist.org/the-complete-list/
>
>

-- 
Check out the Commons Transition Plan here at: http://commonstransition.org

P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net  - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net

<http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation>Updates:
http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens

#82 on the (En)Rich list: http://enrichlist.org/the-complete-list/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ourproject.org/pipermail/p2p-foundation/attachments/20151108/6c10a969/attachment-0001.htm 