No subject

Thu May 29 13:38:36 CEST 2014

Gotha to Comintern the discussion between theses and factions, being
formed among groups of friends, based on one important but small
faction or an entirely new frame of theoretical-analytical
abstraction, took the conflicts between individuals and caused strong
and irreversible demarcations between sppousedly emancipatory visions
and energies.. May be most of the time very stupid reasons, like
money, girl, ego casued these we can't now...  Then we (emancipatory
peopel) had reproduced the power games of rulers -can be traced easily
in the tone of writings of Marx, Engels, Luxembourg, Kautsky, Lenin,
Proudhon, Bakunin,... the spirit of the time is gaining respect and
authority for argument was full fledged attacks on personality.. plus
whatever possible, as may be a result of structural possibilities
limiting communication. It killed the true spirit of
revolution/emancipation as well as prevented prefigurative ethical
politics as such. In my opinion this made it possible for the rulers
to survive and evolve into capitalist class agency for itself and gave
them advantage. Since they saw that their grave digger were also like
them.. since we did reproduce the capitalist form of power
accumulation. It is not possible in the same way today, p2p mode of
communication allows more open confrontations and conflict resolution
processes, egalitarian and ethical - prefigurative relationships, as
well as checks and balances. Still there are ways and tricks to gain
network power and use it against the 'lower order' nodes? so on these
weaknesses there is a work to do. Yet the structurally speaking it is
not impossible to solve these problems today.

orsan