[P2P-F] Fwd: [Networkedlabour] <nettime> Consensus within the Bay Area elites?

Tue May 27 16:03:30 CEST 2014

Dear Gordon.

Am 26/05/2014 21:04, schrieb Gordon Cook:
 > you can't read my sport until it is published

Yes, of course. But then, i have no payed Abo for your reports. Can i 
read it on your page then?

 > yes i think it has now degenerated into theater thanks to the coup 
d'etat of daniel Vazquez

No, it is not only Daniel Vazquez. This is impossible. Daniel is only 
the symbol of the thinking and intentions of the people in the 
institutions in Ecuador.

You published in your report the speech of Rene Ramirez. And in his text 
we read that he accept and like the private occupation of knowledge. In 
principle. And, maybe, the most people in the FLOK environment like it 
also. Maybe also Michel. I don't know. I hope also for Jakob, Brian and you.

I am shure for Franz, Quiliro and me. But this is a fundamental 
difference to the FLOK project and his fundamental papers. "Social 
knowledge economy" what is that? A merket oriented economy with 
knowledge as his objects. In german "Wissensgesellschaft" oder 
"Dienstleistungsgesellschaft". A big joke.

In your report you analyse the connectivity situation in Ecuador. 2 
companies from the state and 1 private. And do you find a interest for a 
real support of the peoples (pueblo) with a free access to the 
communication system? Never they have this interest. They want to 
organize the needs for knowledge and exchange of idea and experience as 
a object to capitalization.

If they would have a real interest, it would be very easy to do and we 
would see very different methods. But in the papers, also from Jenny 
Torres, you find nothing. Only bla, bla, bla.

many greetings, willi
Jinotepe, Nicaragua

Am 26/05/2014 21:04, schrieb Gordon Cook:
> you can't read my sport until it is published
>
> A spanish translation of  very LONG executive summitry is being worked on
>
> yes i think it has now degenerated into theater thanks to the coup d'etat of daniel Vazquez
>
> michel's work does not have  table but he is being allowed to speak
>