[P2P-F] Fwd: Climate Change and Collective Intelligence

Fri Nov 15 21:46:16 CET 2013

I recommend the Naomi Klein piece,

Michel

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Tom Atlee <cii at igc.org>
Date: Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 9:35 PM
Subject: Climate Change and Collective Intelligence
To: Michel Bauwens <michel at p2pfoundation.net>

Tom Atlee's Co-Intelligence Journal . The Co-Intelligence Symbol . What
this message is about:Climate change is so big and pervasive we can hardly s

Like<https://go.madmimi.com/redirects/1384547518-5053ab855f8f1d7af9a6d5a375dd8d15-368d707?pa=18307844319&amx=4386670875>
Tweet<https://go.madmimi.com/redirects/1384547518-b527c2cb66209fc0b4f9da9cb53ace58-368d707?pa=18307844319&amx=4386670875>
Pin<https://go.madmimi.com/redirects/1384547518-10c4cede1b4e35307a14d257a37d93a5-368d707?pa=18307844319&amx=4386670875>
+1<https://go.madmimi.com/redirects/1384547518-e864d9f55fed454cddd8f4413103b5f9-368d707?pa=18307844319&amx=4386670875>
[image: RockShadow1RanierCroppedLR]
Tom Atlee's Co-Intelligence Journal
[image: Cii-logo-smaller]<https://go.madmimi.com/redirects/1384547518-09812ac92a5658b3e9a13d60988b0295-368d707?pa=18307844319>

. The Co-Intelligence Symbol .

*What this message is about:*

*Climate change is so big and pervasive we can hardly see it. There's
almost nothing in our collective lives that is bigger in its implications.
The changes it demands of us are the most profound we have ever faced and
they are growing increasingly urgent. Among our most radical challenges is
building the capacity for whole societies to be smarter and wiser
collectively than we are individually...*
Climate Change and Collective
Intelligence<https://go.madmimi.com/redirects/1384547518-41742eeef76849a47ad95a9d0cd7e12b-368d707?pa=18307844319>
[image: 220px-Yin_and_Yang.svg]

Co-evolution of Danger and Opportunity

Climate change is perhaps the largest and most hard to grasp crises we've
ever faced. It is so much more than "global warming" and "rising seas". Its
ramifications are so many, so diverse, and so planetary.

Perhaps the biggest challenge before this one was the very real possibility
of global thermonuclear war during the Cold War. Numerous times we were
mere minutes away from global holocaust. We've made it through those global
rapids... so far.

There are many other potential crises that could be terminal for humanity -
like virulent genetically engineered viruses or self-replicating nanobots
consuming the environment. But those are possibilities, not certainties. In
contrast, climate change is here and growing. Climate change is today and
the day after tomorrow. We can probably still ameliorate it, but not for
much longer. And, unfortunately, we can no longer stop it.

*That makes it a fascinating case for exploring collective intelligence -
our ability to collectively perceive, reflect, act, and review our actions,
done together as an ongoing process of evolving harmonization with the
world around us.*

Remarkably, humanity as a whole isn't really grasping that this climate
transformation is happening, despite our collective scientific and
technological means for observing it. We aren't SEEING it, collectively,
really. Or perhaps I should say that we are collectively seeing something
but can't quite decide what it is and if it is real. (Remember, I'm
speaking here of "us" as the whole of humanity. Of course many people and
groups DO see it and urgently engage with it. But as a collective entity,
we're not even mostly on board with the true reality of it.) Journalism, a
key dynamic in collective perception at the whole-society level, is
definitely failing to play its proper role in public awareness of climate
change. More often than not, it provides entertaining blinders.

And of course it is not only our collective perception that is lacking. So,
too, is our capacity for collective reflection - including public
conversations, news analysis, and deliberations in legislatures, courtrooms
and board rooms. Here and there we find truly sustained attention and
creative strategizing. This, of course, leads to little collective
decision-making and implementation and no concerted review of how any of
our efforts at dealing with this crisis are actually working.... at a
whole-society, whole-humanity level. Again, there are exceptions. But
overall there is a concerted effort to avoid straying too far from
business-as-usual.

But that's the simplicity of collective intelligence - perception,
reflection, action, and review, done together as an ongoing cycle -
institutionalized in our culture, our governance, our economics, our
education - all aspects of our public life.

Our innate cognitive limitations - e.g., as individuals we can't SEE
climate change - combined with money-distorted politics and PR
manipulations make it exceedingly difficult for us to exercise much
collective intelligence about climate change. We don't currently have the
capacity to collectively recognize that our economic and political systems
are systematically killing us - "us" not being just you and me, but
civilization itself - relentlessly, even as more and more money flows
through those systems leaving behind the fantasy of prosperity.

Once seen, it becomes clear that not only do we need to handle climate
change, we need to handle the cultural and systemic arrangements that have
impeded our ability to handle climate change (as well as to handle all
other issues we face). The implications are truly revolutionary - or, if
you prefer, radically transformational.

*What do we need to do to radically transform our capacity to collectively
realize what is happening in and around us, to collectively reflect on what
should be done about it, to collectively act on the best solutions and
initiatives we can come up with together, and to collectively note and
reflect on the results? What changes to politics, economics, governance,
education, journalism, technology, culture, community, and the shape of our
lives and our world could enable us to be more intelligent and wise
together?* The answers are never-ending and urgently important.

The two pieces excerpted below tackle both the difficulty of comprehending
our situation and, once we overcome that difficulty, some of the radical
implications of what's needed. There is much more to be said about that,
but these articles along with my commentary above provide a
thought-provoking starting place.

I recommend the long forms of both articles, available at the links
provided. But the excerpts will give you a good taste of them quickly.

Coheartedly,
Tom

= = = = = = = = = = = =

Excerpt from
How science is telling us all to
revolt<https://go.madmimi.com/redirects/1384547518-f870847667a84183c39bf09f2bdec635-368d707?pa=18307844319>

Is our relentless quest for economic growth killing the planet? Climate
scientists have seen the data – and they are coming to some incendiary
conclusions.

By Naomi Klein

Brad Werner... geophysicist from the University of California, San Diego
[gave a complex systems theory presentation at the Fall Meeting of the
American Geophysical Union in December 2012 entitled] “Is Earth F--ked?
Dynamical Futility of Global Environmental Management and Possibilities for
Sustainability via Direct Action Activism”. [In it, he concluded that]
global capitalism has made the depletion of resources so rapid, convenient
and barrier-free that “earth-human systems” are becoming dangerously
unstable in response. When pressed by a journalist for a clear answer on
the “are we f--ked” question, Werner set the jargon aside and replied,
“More or less.”....

[Werner] is saying that his research shows that our entire economic
paradigm is a threat to ecological stability. And indeed that challenging
this economic paradigm – through mass-movement counter-pressure – is
humanity’s best shot at avoiding catastrophe.

That’s heavy stuff. But he’s not alone. Werner is part of a small but
increasingly influential group of scientists whose research into the
destabilisation of natural systems – particularly the climate system – is
leading them to similarly transformative, even revolutionary,
conclusions.... [D]itching of [the present economic order] in favour of
something new (and perhaps, with lots of work, better) is no longer a
matter of mere ideological preference but rather one of species-wide
existential necessity....

Kevin Anderson, the deputy director of the Tyndall Centre for Climate
Change Research, .... points out that the chances of staying within
anything like safe temperature levels are diminishing fast. With his
colleague Alice Bows, a climate mitigation expert at the Tyndall Centre,
Anderson points out that we have lost so much time to political stalling
and weak climate policies – all while global consumption (and emissions)
ballooned – that we are now facing cuts so drastic that they challenge the
fundamental logic of prioritising GDP growth above all else....

To have even a 50/50 chance of hitting the [agreed upon international] 2
degrees [Celsius] target (which...already involves facing an array of
hugely damaging climate impacts), the industrialised countries need to
start cutting their greenhouse-gas emissions by something like 10 per cent
a year – and they need to start right now....

Anderson and Bows [point] out that this target cannot be met with the array
of modest carbon pricing or green-tech solutions usually advocated by big
green groups. These measures will certainly help, to be sure, but they are
simply not enough: a 10 percent drop in emissions, year after year, is
virtually unprecedented since we started powering our economies with coal.
In fact, cuts above 1 percent per year “have historically been associated
only with economic recession or upheaval”, as the economist Nicholas Stern
put it in his 2006 report for the British government....

So what Anderson and Bows are really saying is that there is still time to
avoid catastrophic warming, but not within the rules of capitalism as they
are currently constructed. Which may be the best argument we have ever had
for changing those rules.

In a 2012 essay that appeared in the influential scientific journal Nature
Climate Change, Anderson and Bows laid down something of a gauntlet,
accusing many of their fellow scientists of failing to come clean about the
kind of changes that climate change demands of humanity. On this it is
worth quoting the pair at length:

". . . in developing emission scenarios scientists repeatedly and severely
underplay the implications of their analyses. When it comes to avoiding a 2
degree [Celsius] rise, 'impossible' is translated into 'difficult but
doable', whereas 'urgent and radical' emerge as 'challenging' – all to
appease the god of economics (or, more precisely, finance). For example, to
avoid exceeding the maximum rate of emission reduction dictated by
economists, 'impossibly' early peaks in emissions are assumed, together
with naive notions about 'big' engineering and the deployment rates of
low-carbon infrastructure. More disturbingly, as emissions budgets dwindle,
so geoengineering is increasingly proposed to ensure that the diktat of
economists remains unquestioned."....

By August 2013, Anderson was willing to be even more blunt, writing that
the boat had sailed on gradual change.... "Today, after two decades of
bluff and lies, the remaining 2°C budget demands revolutionary change to
the political and economic hegemony”....

= = = = = =

Excerpts from
Bigger Than That: (The Difficulty of) Looking at Climate
Change<https://go.madmimi.com/redirects/1384547518-a6caadb389fbde9f00ae4e4dab739889-368d707?pa=18307844319>

by Rebecca Solnit

We’re not very good at looking at the biggest things. They may be bigger
than we can see, or move more slowly than we have the patience to watch for
or remember or piece together, or they may cause impacts that are
themselves complex and dispersed and stretch into the future. Scandals are
easier. They are on a distinctly human scale, the scale of lust, greed, and
violence. We like those, we understand them, we get mired in them, and
mostly they mean little or nothing in the long run (or often even in the
short run)....

Some things are so big you don’t see them, or you don’t want to think about
them, or you almost can’t think about them. Climate change is one of those
things. It’s impossible to see the whole, because it’s everything. It’s not
just a seven-story-tall black wave about to engulf your town, it’s a
complete system thrashing out of control, so that it threatens to become
too hot, too cold, too dry, too wet, too wild, too destructive, too erratic
for many plants and animals that depend on reliable annual cycles. It
affects the entire surface of the Earth and every living thing, from the
highest peaks to the depths of the oceans, from one pole to the other, from
the tropics to the tundra, likely for millennia -- and... it’s already here.

It’s not only bigger than everything else, it’s bigger than everything else
put together. But it’s not a sudden event like a massacre or a flood or a
fire, even though it includes floods, fires, heat waves, and wild weather.
It’s an incremental shift over decades, over centuries. It’s the definition
of the big picture itself, the far-too-big picture. Which is why we have so
much news about everything else, or so it seems.

To understand climate change, you need to translate figures into impacts,
to think about places you’ll never see and times after you’re gone....

We like to think about morality and sex and the lives of people we’ve
gotten to know in some fashion. We know how to do it. It’s on a distinctly
human scale. It’s disturbing in a reassuring way. We fret about it and feel
secure in doing so. Now, everything’s changed, and our imaginations need to
keep pace with that change. What is human scale anyway? These days, after
all, we split atoms and tinker with genes and can melt an ice sheet. We
were designed to think about human-scale phenomena, and now that very
phrase is almost as meaningless as old terms like “glacial,” which used to
mean slow-moving and slow to change....

If there is to be an effort to respond to climate change, it will need to
make epic differences in economics, in ecologies, in the largest and most
powerful systems around us. Though the goals may be heroic, they will be
achieved mostly through an endless accumulation of small gestures.

Those gestures are in your hands, and everyone’s. Or they could be if we
learned to see the true scale of things, including how big we can be
together.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
site: http://www.co-intelligence.org<https://go.madmimi.com/redirects/1384547518-b6094532f9cc56950793190464a981d5-368d707?pa=18307844319>/
blog:
http://tomatleeblog.com<https://go.madmimi.com/redirects/1384547518-11ecf481580037ea715aa3c385d65949-368d707?pa=18307844319>
Read Empowering Public
Wisdom<https://go.madmimi.com/redirects/1384547518-567d47071675fa2c6a9710221d459e4e-368d707?pa=18307844319>,
The Tao of Democracy<https://go.madmimi.com/redirects/1384547518-3ce46cca109625c446e20f7d4b198d41-368d707?pa=18307844319>and
           Reflections on Evolutionary
Activism<https://go.madmimi.com/redirects/1384547518-0991ec37885b7512af827dc51b13b536-368d707?pa=18307844319>
Please support our work. Your
donations<https://go.madmimi.com/redirects/1384547518-a1411bfa45dd580d8d01311320a15df8-368d707?pa=18307844319>are
fully tax-deductible in the U.S.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Prefer plain text?

This format is what I am now using for all my messages. *If you wish to
receive my messages in plain text format* send me an email at
cii at igc.orgwith "Revert to plain text format" in the Subject line.
©2013 Co-Intelligence Institute | PO Box 493, Eugene, OR 97440
Web Version<https://go.madmimi.com/redirects/1384547518-d8665edcd484a4932635e1c4283042da-368d707?pa=18307844319&amx=4386670875>
Forward<https://go.madmimi.com/redirects/1384547518-dbf097c18c446a834567b49ed6003611-368d707?pa=18307844319&amx=4386670875>
Unsubscribe<https://go.madmimi.com/redirects/1384547518-c9add3e13da6249cfb873c9442d29e53-368d707?pa=18307844319&amx=4386670875>

Powered by *Mad Mimi*
®<https://go.madmimi.com/redirects/1384547518-b854c068acb9e72affbeceea4ee917e4-368d707?pa=18307844319&amx=4386670875>

-- 
P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net  - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net

<http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation>Updates:
http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens

#82 on the (En)Rich list: http://enrichlist.org/the-complete-list/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/p2p-foundation/attachments/20131115/6153e150/attachment-0001.htm 