[P2P-F] Fwd: [Networkedlabour] Capitalism, Internet, Democracy, Fascism
anna at shsh.co.uk
Mon Aug 19 23:55:25 CEST 2013
"what is emerging veers toward a classic definition of fascism: the state
and large corporations working hand in hand to promote corporate interests,
and a state preoccupied with militarism, secrecy, propaganda and
This is emerging precisely because we have an internet. What is emerging is
not new, but now it can be seen clearly. I cannot argue with this
'scholarly' analysis, but it does seem very one-sided. Yes what we see on
the internet mirrors the world in which it exists. But the internet has
transformed my life and the lives of many others.
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Michel Bauwens
<michel at p2pfoundation.net>wrote:
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: peter waterman <peterwaterman1936 at gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 3:37 PM
> Subject: [Networkedlabour] Capitalism, Internet, Democracy, Fascism
> To: networkedlabour at lists.contrast.org
> [image: rabble.ca]
> Published on *rabble.ca* (http://rabble.ca)
> Home <http://rabble.ca/> > Digital revolution: 'Digital Disconnect'
> analyzes corporate control of our digital communications future
> Digital Communication<http://rabble.ca/category/slug/digital-communication>
> Digital revolution: 'Digital Disconnect' analyzes corporate control of our
> digital communications future Why a broad, progressive movement is needed
> to reform our Internet
> Greg Macdougall <http://rabble.ca/taxonomy/term/7741> 
> | August 1, 2013
> [image: image/jpeg icon]cover.jpg<http://rabble.ca/sites/rabble/files/node-images/cover_6.jpg>
> Digital Disconnect: How Capitalism is Turning the Internet Against
> by Robert W. McChesney
> (The New Press,
> *Digital Disconnect: How Capitalism is Turning the Internet Against
>  *discusses how politics and the "capitalist*" economic system of the
> United States has very much warped the initial vision and potential of a
> non-commercial democratic Internet. In it noted scholar and activist Robert
> W. McChesney does a good job of illustrating the "banana republic" -- that
> is the corporately-controlled -- status of the U.S. state.
> Beyond just communication media, McChesney describes how for the overall
> society, "what is emerging veers toward a classic definition of fascism:
> the state and large corporations working hand in hand to promote corporate
> interests, and a state preoccupied with militarism, secrecy, propaganda and
> surveillance." And this understanding of U.S. society is very important in
> understanding the business of the Internet.
> McChesney cites a scene from *The Godfather II* where the gangsters meet
> to divide up their control of Cuba and then show their appreciation for how
> nice it is to be working in a country "with a friendly government that
> knows how to work with 'private enterprise'" -- this, McChesney says, is an
> apt analogy showing the true nature of who controls the Internet and the
> trend of continuing (and increased) consolidation of this control.
> *Digital Disconnect *aims to bring a political economy analysis to our
> digital media communication future. Specifically, McChesney describes and
> applies a "political economy of communication" (PEC) that "evaluates media
> and communication systems by determining how they affect political and
> social power in society and whether they are, on balance, forces for or
> against democracy and successful self-government."
> And he notes that how a society chooses to structure its media system is
> "of paramount importance."
> Personally, I’ve always liked a quote of McChesney’s: "regardless of what
> a progressive group's first issue of importance is, its second issue should
> be media and communication, because so long as the media is in corporate
> hands, the task of social change will be vastly more difficult, if not
> impossible, across the board."
> This quote frames the importance of *Digital Disconnect*; it provides a
> deep analysis of the contributing factors and potential ways forward in
> relation to what has become such a vital element in shaping our societies
> and the way the future will develop.
> McChesney starts off by describing and examining the different sets of
> views -- from the "celebrants" and the "skeptics" -- about the Internet’s
> potential and impact upon society. McChesney then adds that a critical
> omission was that most of these people did not have a sufficient analysis
> of the impact of "capitalism*" and the effect it has had on the development
> of the Internet.
> And then McChesney gets to the (*) on "capitalism."
> The fact that theoretical capitalism, or capitalism by standard definition
> or catechism, does not equal the same thing as what we actually have -- or
> as he puts it, "really existing capitalism."
> The second chapter explores this "really existing" capitalist economic
> system that exists in the U.S. and elsewhere, with specific aim of how it
> is relevant to the communications analysis that is the rest of the book.
> McChesney has developed his thinking through a lengthy career of academic
> research, writing 12 other authored or co-authored books and involvement in
> media reform advising and advocacy, including being a co-founder and past
> president of the Free Press organization.
> In *Digital Disconnect*, he states that now, "We are in a position, in
> some respects for the first time, to make sense of the Internet experience
> and highlight the cutting-edge issues it poses for society." And thus, he
> attempts to address some of the "big questions" out there, the main one
> being exactly that: to make sense of what is happening with the Internet
> and society.
> One major fact to help make sense of things is that "in short, the
> Internet monopolists sit at the commanding heights of U.S. and world
> capitalism." This is backed up by the fact that in 2012, 13 of the 30
> largest U.S. corporations were Internet or computer companies.
> McChesney illustrates the way that these major corporations have worked
> and lobbied with governments to set policy in their own favour, as well as
> illuminating how Internet factors work to create monopoly-inducing
> One statistic he cites is from *Wired<http://www.wired.com/magazine/2010/08/ff_webrip/>
> * magazine: in 2001 the top ten websites accounted for 31 per cent of
> all page views, 40 per cent in 2006 and about 75 per cent in 2010.
> He also breaks down the near-monopolies in different areas: Google
> controls nearly 70 per cent of the search-engine market and 97 per cent of
> mobile searching; Microsoft Windows accounts for 90 per cent of computer
> operating systems; Apple's iTunes has 87 per cent market share of digital
> music downloads and 70 per cent of media-player downloads; and Amazon sells
> between 70 and 80 per cent of all books and e-books online.
> He also writes about what "may be the great Achilles' heel of the Internet
> under capitalism: the money comes from surreptitiously violating any known
> understanding of privacy."
> This is not only true when it comes to surveillance operations by the
> government -- which he analyzes in terms of the nature of the relationship
> between the government and the major Internet corporations -- but more
> broadly as influenced by "targeted-advertising" approaches that reward
> sites for collecting as much information on their visitors as possible.
> He notes the change from 2003, when digital publishers received almost all
> the advertising money spent on their sites, to 2010, where nearly 80 per
> cent of the advertising money went instead to the ad networks and data
> collectors and managers. Google and Facebook are the two most noted data
> gathering companies.
> In terms of journalism, he gives a list of the fundamental characteristics
> of the type of journalism required for a healthy democratic society and
> then describes the deepening crisis in journalism -- basically a reduction
> in original news gathering and no real difference between almost all
> mainstream journalistic thinking and establishment political thinking.
> McChesney argues this crisis is not caused by digital communications, but
> simply quickened by it. Further analysis leads him to the argument that
> there is no for-profit business model that works for the type of journalism
> that we need for the public good; instead it must be publicly supported and
> invested in.
> Overall, McChesney's conclusion to the digital problems laid out in *Digital
> Disconnect* is that a large, broad progressive movement is needed, not
> one solely devoted to the Internet or media, but one that does necessarily
> challenge the "really existing capitalism" that has so much negative
> influence on society’s overall functioning and on people’s individual lives.
> McChesney calls on people concerned with the media to broaden their focus
> and make joint cause with others working towards social justice, and he
> sees this current time as a critical juncture where real substantive
> changes are possible.
> However, McChesney argues that this broad movement must have Internet and
> media issues at its centre: "efforts to reform or replace capitalism but
> leave the Internet giants riding high will not reform or replace really
> existing capitalism."
> *Digital Disconnect* shows how and why this broad movement is important,
> and helps make sense of how we could get this reform to work.
> *Greg Macdougall does community organizing, education and media-making
> based in Ottawa, unceded Native territory. More of his work on media can be
> found at his site EquitableEducation.ca <http://equitableeducation.ca/writings/media>
> internet activism<http://rabble.ca/category/tags-issues/internet-activism>
>  internet democracy<http://rabble.ca/category/tags-issues/internet-democracy>
>  corporate agenda<http://rabble.ca/category/tags-issues/corporate-agenda>
>  book reviews <http://rabble.ca/category/tags-issues/book-reviews>
>  digital future <http://rabble.ca/category/tags/digital-future>  communication
> policies <http://rabble.ca/category/tags/communication-policies> 
> *Source URL (retrieved on Aug 19 2013 - 4:35am):*
> - *EBook (co-editor), February 2013: World Social Forum: Critical
> Explorations http://www.into-ebooks.com/book/world_social_forum/ **
> - ***EBook, November 2012: Recovering Internationalism<http://www.into-ebooks.com/book/recovering_internationalism/>.
> *[Now *free *in two download formats]<http://www.into-ebooks.com/book/world_social_forum/>
> * <http://www.into-ebooks.com/book/world_social_forum/>*
> - *Interface Journal Special (co-editor), November 2012: **For the
> Global Emancipation of Labour<http://www.interfacejournal.net/current/>
> - *Blog:** http://www.unionbook.org/profile/peterwaterman. *
> - *EBook 2011, Under, Against, Beyond (Compilation 1980s-90s)
> - *Paper 2012:** The 2nd Coming of the World Federation of
> Trade Unions
> - *
> 2012: Marikana, South Africa, The March of the Undead<http://www.unionbook.org/profiles/blogs/marikana-south-africa-elsewhere-the-dance-of-the-undead>
> - *Chapter, 2013. 'Many New Internationalisms!', in Corinne Kumar
> (ed), Asking, We Walk:** The South as New Political Imaginary,Bangalore:Streelekha Publications.
> Networkedlabour mailing list
> Networkedlabour at lists.contrast.org
> P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net
> http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens
> #82 on the (En)Rich list: http://enrichlist.org/the-complete-list/
> P2P Foundation - Mailing list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the P2P-Foundation