[P2P-F] Fw: Improvised Artwhistling. A New P2P Foundation Entry for the Music Section?

robert searle dharao4 at yahoo.co.uk
Sat Nov 12 11:17:48 CET 2011




----- Forwarded Message -----
From: robert searle <dharao4 at yahoo.co.uk>
To: "dharao4 at yahoo.co.uk" <dharao4 at yahoo.co.uk>
Sent: Saturday, 12 November 2011, 10:08
Subject: Improvised Artwhistling.




In the context of this entry, Artwhistling can be seen as whistling of a high professional quality. If heard by chance it would be very difficult to determine whether it is whistling, or indeed, a wind instrument being played in a  "beauteous" manner. Improvised Artwhistling is another dimension which like Improvised Voice Instrumental Music is to a large extent uncharted waters of musical creativity that may gain greater credence in time if the right performer, or performers appear. However, there is much material on Non-Improvised Artwhistling, or "good" whistling in general.

What is perhaps surprising is that many people find it difficult, if not impossible to whistle well. As such whistling per se for "musical" entertainment should be seen as a serious, and credible musical exercise which is not easy as it may appear. The following is from Wikipedia...

........many performers on the music hall and Vaudeville circuits were professional whistlers, the most famous of which were Ronnie Ronalde and Fred Lowery. Both had several notable songs featuring whistling.
Pucker whistling is the most common form of whistling used in most Western music. Typically, the tongue tip is lowered, often placed behind the lower teeth, and pitch altered by varying the position of the tongue. In particular, the point at which the tongue body approximates the palate varies from near the uvula (for low notes) to near the alveolar ridge (for high notes). Although varying the degree of pucker will change the pitch of a pucker whistle, expert pucker whistlers will generally only make small variations to the degree of pucker, due to its tendency to affect purity of tone. Pucker whistling can be done by either only blowing out or blowing in and out alternately . In the ' only blow out' method , a consistent tone is achieved but a negligible pause has to be taken to breathe in. In the alternating method there is no problem of breathlessness or interruption as breath is taken when one whistles breathing in . But a disadvantage of this method
 is that many a times , the consistency of tone is not maintained and it fluctuates.
Many expert musical palatal whistlers will substantially alter the position of the lips to ensure a good quality tone. Venetian gondoliers are famous for moving the lips while they whistle in a way that can look like singing. A good example of a palatal whistler is Luke Janssen winner of the 2009 world whistling competition.
The term puccalo refers to highly skilled jazz whistling.
The most significant whistling competition is run by the International Whistlers Convention in North Carolina, UA. Held every year (recently every other has been in other countries), it brings together whistlers from all over the world who battle for the crown of 'International Grand Champion'

Ref http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whistling

Here, are some other links which maybe of interest.More maybe added.

http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=whistling&aq=f
 http://synthonia.org/artwhistling/guide/

Another site is orawhistle which has an excellent forum

Orawhistle : Global Whistlers Forum - Groups - Yahoo 
International whistler discussion forum concerning whistling-related techniques, 
issues and events. Includes sound samples, how-to database, and a 
large ..groups.yahoo.com/group/Orawhistle/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ourproject.org/pipermail/p2p-foundation/attachments/20111112/a8b164b4/attachment.htm 


More information about the P2P-Foundation mailing list