[P2P-F] red hat's restriction's

[Samuel Rose]

On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 9:57 PM, Michel Bauwens <michelsub2004 at gmail.com> wrote:
> http://press.redhat.com/2011/03/04/commitment-to-open/
>
> I would welcome any comments on this for the p2p blog,
>
> see:
>
> Recently, Jonathan Corbet, respected kernel community member and editor at
> LWN, commented on our change in kernel RPM packaging. When we released RHEL
> 6 approximately four months ago, we changed the release of the kernel
> package to have all our patches pre-applied. Why did we make this change? To
> speak bluntly, the competitive landscape has changed. Our competitors in the
> Enterprise Linux market have changed their commercial approach from building
> and competing on their own customized Linux distributions, to one where they
> directly approach our customers offering to support RHEL.
>
> Frankly, our response is to compete. Essential knowledge that our customers
> have relied on to support their RHEL environments will increasingly only be
> available under subscription. The itemization of kernel patches that
> correlate with articles in our knowledge base is no longer available to our
> competitors, but rather only to our customers who have recognized the value
> of RHEL and have thus indirectly funded Red Hat’s contributions to open
> source that will advance their business now and in the future.
>
> --
> P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net  - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net
>
> Connect: http://p2pfoundation.ning.com; Discuss:
> http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation
>
> Updates: http://del.icio.us/mbauwens; http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens;
> http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> P2P Foundation - Mailing list
> http://www.p2pfoundation.net
> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation
>
>

It appears to be a reaction to Oracle. Red Hat is trying to make
Oracle work harder at "cherry picking" kernel updates to
http://www.oracle.com/us/technologies/linux/index.html which is a
re-packaged RHEL.

Not only that, but as the press release says, companies like Oracle
are apparently offering to support RHEL itself. So obscuring the
reason for updates makes it harder for a company to say that they will
support a competitor's product.

As crazy as it may sound, Red Hat could do *better* to figure out a
way to create a long term cooperation agreement with companies like
Oracle, F5 Networks, and others who repackage RHEL. What could these
companies share back with Red Hat that takes money/profit out of the
picture?

-- 
--
Sam Rose
Future Forward Institute and Forward Foundation
Tel:+1(517) 639-1552
Cel: +1-(517)-974-6451
skype: samuelrose
email: samuel.rose at gmail.com
http://forwardfound.org
http://futureforwardinstitute.org
http://hollymeadcapital.com
http://p2pfoundation.net
http://socialmediaclassroom.com

"The universe is not required to be in perfect harmony with human
ambition." - Carl Sagan