[P2P-F] How the 'ecosystem' myth has been used for sinister means

Wed Jun 1 08:58:23 CEST 2011

getting error messages for now ..

On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Dan Brickley <danbri at danbri.org> wrote:

> On 31 May 2011 09:39, Michel Bauwens <michelsub2004 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > sam, re your last paragraph,
> >
> > that seems to me the central weakness of the curtis approach, lumping all
> > network-theory/complexity/cybernetics/ecosystems as one big exclusively
> > randian approach ..
>
> Might be worth responding on his blog post,
>
> http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/adamcurtis/2011/05/all_watched_over_by_machines_o.html#comments
>
> I see no sign of replies from Curtis, but maybe he reads at least.
>
> Dan
>
> _______________________________________________
> P2P Foundation - Mailing list
> http://www.p2pfoundation.net
> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation
>

-- 
P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net  - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net

Connect: http://p2pfoundation.ning.com; Discuss:
http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation

Updates: http://del.icio.us/mbauwens; http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens;
http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ourproject.org/pipermail/p2p-foundation/attachments/20110601/890731a1/attachment.htm 