[P2P-F] mobile phones incompatible with organic life

Wed Jan 19 17:00:33 CET 2011

Michel, Simon, 

actually it seems that the University's report has not been released. Some pre-release quotes can be found here:

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/scalar_tech/esp_scalartech_cellphonesmicrowave26.htm

The data on damage done by electromagnetic radiation can be found in many places. The question is - what's your bias. If you tend to believe the industries that manufacture wireless and mobile phone technology, there is nothing there ... move on, nothing to see. 

If you look around and get into the movement of people who actually get sick from the radiation, and who are trying to raise the alarm, there is quite a bit of data and quite some studies to be found, and scientists warning. But unfortunately, with a lot of money riding on mobile technologies, it seems that the press has been called off and told to cool it. 

What can I say - it's all up in the air. Those who have eyes to see and ears to hear will understand ... even before the news is all over the press and the number of cancers and consequent deaths can no longer be covered up.

Sepp

ps: here is a blog that seems to concentrate on the issue...

http://eliehouse.wordpress.com/2010/11/22/wi-fi-makes-trees-sick-study-says-wageningen-university/

"The individual is supreme and finds the way through intuition"

http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/  
http://www.laleva.org
http://blog.hasslberger.com/ 
http://www.facebook.com/hasslberger
http://twitter.com/healthsupreme

.

On Jan 19, 2011, at 8:54 AM, Michel Bauwens wrote:

> Hi Dan,
> 
> in our blog we excerpt and curate to make people think, not necessarily to convince, but the article has a link to the research paper
> 
> I think Sepp can point to more material?
> 
> Sepp, perhaps you could make a summary of recent studies, as an update to that article?
> 
> Michel
> 
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 1:38 AM, Simon Dann <simon at photogabble.co.uk> wrote:
> As much as I enjoy reading newsreaders hyperbowl, it would have been nice to see the research paper itself and a link to the peer reviewed paper it has been submitted to. With that said, even if such electro-magnetic affects are proven by more than one independent non-biased source - this doesn't mean that the same reaction will be found in animals. 
> 
> I remember watching a documentary on the subject which concluded that the amount of electromagnetic radiation given off by wireless devices is little more than that which is found naturally occurring in and around our atmosphere due to both terrestrial extra-terrestrial sources.
> 
> Electromagnetic radiation emitted from wireless devices is non-ionising so far as I am aware, it is not the ionising reaction of ionising-radiation which destroys biological reactants such as dna? 
> 
> I am pretty open minded on the whole subject, and a little more information would make me a lot less skeptical.
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Michel Bauwens <michelsub2004 at gmail.com> wrote:
> http://blog.p2pfoundation.net/dutch-study-confirms-mobile-electro-magnetic-radiation-affects-the-health-of-trees/2011/01/18
> 
> _______________________________________________
> P2P Foundation - Mailing list
> http://www.p2pfoundation.net
> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net  - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net 
> 
> Connect: http://p2pfoundation.ning.com; Discuss: http://listcultures.org/mailman/listinfo/p2presearch_listcultures.org
> 
> Updates: http://del.icio.us/mbauwens; http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens; http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens
> 
> Think tank: http://www.asianforesightinstitute.org/index.php/eng/The-AFI
> 
> 
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ourproject.org/pipermail/p2p-foundation/attachments/20110119/58f2f21d/attachment.htm 