[P2P-F] Strategy ? : Phyles as economic networks between Intentional Communities ?

[Michel Bauwens]

an important aspect of a phyle would be its global identity, so a coop can
be a phyle but not necessarily, and a phyle can be a coop but not
necessarity

On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 9:34 PM, Dante-Gabryell Monson <
dante.monson at gmail.com> wrote:

> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intentional_community
>
> " They typically also share responsibilities and resources. "
>
> http://p2pfoundation.net/Phyles
>
> *business-empowered communities: they are not companies linked to a
> community, but transnational communities that have acquired enterprises in
> order to gain continuity in time and robustness*
>
> Example of a Phyle which does not call itself a Phyle ?
>
> http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coop%C3%A9ratives_Longo_Ma%C3%AF
>



-- 
P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net  - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net

Connect: http://p2pfoundation.ning.com; Discuss:
http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation

Updates: http://del.icio.us/mbauwens; http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens;
http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ourproject.org/pipermail/p2p-foundation/attachments/20111227/c6beb8c8/attachment.htm